giuliani & Ukraine Associate Spying On Yovanovitch

[progressive hunter]

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

 

[Faun]

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

 

[progressive hunter]

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

What are you talking about? It IS illegal to funnel foreign money to political candidates but that’s not even the point. The point is WHY he was doing it. And he was doing it to remove the Ambassador because she stood in the way of Trump’s Ukraine scheme

He was funneling in illegal money, huh? So why not post a credible link to your claim? Nobody was talking about money except you. My point is that he didn't need money if he wanted her gone. All he had to do was get the message to Trump that she was a problem, and Trump would have looked into it and got rid of her without any kind of money.

The fact remains that (among other things) he funneled illegal foreign money to a Texas Republican Congressman with the express purpose of lobbying that POS to get the Ambassador removed

So where is your link of this claim?

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

 

[progressive hunter]

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

There’s a lot more to it than that. It’s a bit like robbing a bank and saying “it’s not illegal to have a bag of cash”. You sorta leave out some details by characterizing it such.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

 

[progressive hunter]

again with the opinions,,,facts say different,,

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

 

[Faun]

Liar, I'm posting facts...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

 

[progressive hunter]

REALLY??? bloomburg...

"casting doubts" is nothing but opinion,,

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

Uh, no, I didn't say that. You're just an idiot.

 

[colfax_m]

LOLOL

That's a headline. And that doubt is on the timeline, not whether or not Shokin was pursuing Burisma. The article clearly shows he wasn't for 2 years until he was sacked.

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

The prosecutor wasn’t investigating anyone that wasn’t lining his pockets with cash and diamonds.

That’s the guy they wanted fired.

 

[progressive hunter]

and he was sacked because he was trying to reopen it,,,,

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

Uh, no, I didn't say that. You're just an idiot.

you said he got fired for not prosecuting corruption and that the new guy did investigate burisma,,,isnt that the same thing??

so what corruption didnt he prosecute??

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

There’s a lot more to it than that. It’s a bit like robbing a bank and saying “it’s not illegal to have a bag of cash”. You sorta leave out some details by characterizing it such.

That guy is a renown liar and back stabber. He does whatever it takes to get out of trouble.

 

[Faun]

There's no evidence he was trying to reopen it other than him saying that now. Meanwhile, it was reopened after he was out after he sat on it for two years.

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

Uh, no, I didn't say that. You're just an idiot.

you said he got fired for not prosecuting corruption and that the new guy did investigate burisma,,,isnt that the same thing??

so what corruption didnt he prosecute??

Of course it's not the same thing. Shokin was fired because he was corrupt. Zlochevsky was not the only oligarch he was letting slide.

 

[progressive hunter]

do you have proof he lied???

and it wasnt just him that said it, one of his coworkers also said it and I posted that interview,,,

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

Uh, no, I didn't say that. You're just an idiot.

you said he got fired for not prosecuting corruption and that the new guy did investigate burisma,,,isnt that the same thing??

so what corruption didnt he prosecute??

Of course it's not the same thing. Shokin was fired because he was corrupt. Zlochevsky was not the only oligarch he was letting slide.

what does that even mean???

youre all over the place.

 

[Faun]

The proof is in his actions and the actions of the General Prosecutor's office.

Shokin sat on it for 2 years. He was thrown out and then the General Prosecutor's office did reopen it. Shokin was thrown out in early 2016. He did not say he was reopening the Burisma investigation. He did not say that in 2017 or 2018. Only in 2019 did he finally make such a claim.

so youre saying biden had him fired because he wasnt investigating the company his son was working for???

YEAH RIGHT,,that makes sense,,,

Uh, no, I didn't say that. You're just an idiot.

you said he got fired for not prosecuting corruption and that the new guy did investigate burisma,,,isnt that the same thing??

so what corruption didnt he prosecute??

Of course it's not the same thing. Shokin was fired because he was corrupt. Zlochevsky was not the only oligarch he was letting slide.

what does that even mean???

youre all over the place.

Umm, it means Shokin was corrupt.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Documents show that Giuliani & his friends spying on Marie Yovanovitch in Ukraine. Since giuliani was there as trump's lawyer working for trump, he was spying on her for trump. In his campaign to get her fired. She left Ukraine because she was told she had to leave immediately for personal security reasons.

This is bad. These documents show so such nefarious actions by giuliani and trump. We have a president who spies on people only so they can pull off their corrupt schemes.

They even knew if her computer was turned on or not. They comment about how you can buy "anything" in Ukraine and talk about people willing to help if you/we like the price.

This is an American citizen with our own government spying on her and possibly allowing something to happen to her.

This is disgusting. People need to be held accountable for this.

Explosive new documents involving Rudy Giuliani and a Ukrainian associate show the shocking extent of Trump's pressure campaign

lolololol, if this were true, it would have come out in the house hearings.


And if it is true, we dont give a fuck about trump spying on people after the shot your side did to him, go fuck yourself

"we dont [sic] give a fuck" This. The sum all of CRC trumpanzees. #Becauseitsacult.

Nope because they all do it......Obama used executive privilege all the time, get a clue

 

[buckeye45_73]

Documents show that Giuliani & his friends spying on Marie Yovanovitch in Ukraine. Since giuliani was there as trump's lawyer working for trump, he was spying on her for trump. In his campaign to get her fired. She left Ukraine because she was told she had to leave immediately for personal security reasons.

This is bad. These documents show so such nefarious actions by giuliani and trump. We have a president who spies on people only so they can pull off their corrupt schemes.

They even knew if her computer was turned on or not. They comment about how you can buy "anything" in Ukraine and talk about people willing to help if you/we like the price.

This is an American citizen with our own government spying on her and possibly allowing something to happen to her.

This is disgusting. People need to be held accountable for this.

Explosive new documents involving Rudy Giuliani and a Ukrainian associate show the shocking extent of Trump's pressure campaign

OMG!!!
the president spying on a corrupt ambassador after shes caught colluding with foreign government officials to effect our election and also to stop a corruption investigation of a previous VP,,,

whats the world coming to???

"corrupt ambassador"? What corrupt ambassador?

What, government officials being corrupt.....no only Trump is. YOU PEOPLE are retarded