Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history

Earth has been warming up for over 12,000 years. Why do you regressives deny nature?
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

"sources: GHCN-v3 1880-11/2017 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-11/2017
using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment"

LOL, we eliminated the data the refused to show warming.

It's not in the same universe as science
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

Satellites have Nov DOWN by 0.3degC from Oct.. Giss has it down only 0.03degC... Why do you think that is?

"sources: GHCN-v3 1880-11/2017 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-11/2017
using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment"

The data was "adjusted" to conform with AGW orthodoxy
 
"sources: GHCN-v3 1880-11/2017 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-11/2017
using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment"

The data was "adjusted" to conform with AGW orthodoxy
You know I pray for a tropical planet every day. Don't take that away from me.
 
Well, today in some parts of the TX panhandle, it got up to 70 degrees.

Here in Amarillo, it was upper 60's.

And this is December 18th.
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

Satellites have Nov DOWN by 0.3degC from Oct.. Giss has it down only 0.03degC... Why do you think that is?

"sources: GHCN-v3 1880-11/2017 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-11/2017
using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment"

The data was "adjusted" to conform with AGW orthodoxy

Damn it.! You beat me to it!

Eliminating anything that doesn't prop up the mem...
 
Hide and watch boys and girls... NASA has shown that the sun is dimming and that we are losing energy at the surface of the earth. 0.3% (or about 1.6W/m^2) in the last two years.. With increased ion radiation hitting earths atmosphere, cloud formation is increasing further cooling the oceans. We have peaked in temp rise and we have nowhere to go but down for thirty years..

The sun is blank, NASA data shows it to be dimming
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
upload_2017-12-18_20-42-59.png
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

They've completely WIPED the large 1998 El Nino event from history to make that claim.. It's GONE.. Why do you suppose it disappeared Matthew??
Mr. Flaccaltenn, why the lies? I thought you were better than that.

1996 25 48 32 36 27 25 35 48 25 18 41 40 33 32 34 32 36 28 1996
1997 31 37 53 36 36 54 35 41 53 62 64 59 47 45 36 42 43 60 1997
1998 60 90 63 63 69 77 68 66 41 44 49 56 62 62 69 65 70
45 1998
1999 47 65 34 33 31 37 37 31 41 39 38 43 40 41 56 33 35 39 1999
2000 24 56 58 57 36 41 39 42 41 28 32 29 40 41 41 50 41 34 2000

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
 
Giss says second hottest Nov-Dec in recorded history at .89c.. It will depend on how December turns out on the exact ranking of 2017. We will see. At this moment I'd say the odds are in favor of this year being second.
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

They've completely WIPED the large 1998 El Nino event from history to make that claim.. It's GONE.. Why do you suppose it disappeared Matthew??
Mr. Flaccaltenn, why the lies? I thought you were better than that.

1996 25 48 32 36 27 25 35 48 25 18 41 40 33 32 34 32 36 28 1996
1997 31 37 53 36 36 54 35 41 53 62 64 59 47 45 36 42 43 60 1997
1998 60 90 63 63 69 77 68 66 41 44 49 56 62 62 69 65 70
45 1998
1999 47 65 34 33 31 37 37 31 41 39 38 43 40 41 56 33 35 39 1999
2000 24 56 58 57 36 41 39 42 41 28 32 29 40 41 41 50 41 34 2000

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

It's not a lie.. Graph it out. The YEAR of the biggest El Nino in the later 1/2 of the 20th century only has one maybe two months with any appreciable anomaly (year to year) over 0.3degC.. Can't you read? Obviously not. Because FYI the last six entries in any one line don't count as monthlies. They are biannual or quarterlies and just repetitions of the monthly entries.

Back 10 years ago -- I can show you GISS plots that showed the event nearly 50% higher.. It's been wiped. Like a server. With a cloth.. And although the sat data was always higher for El Ninos (and more representative of the actual ATMOS temps), there was closer agreement 10 years ago..
 
Last edited:
I am going to be honest with the liberterians in this thread. I simply don't even read your post or hold any credibility in what you say.

Why? Because you don't have any research to your name or peer review for me to trust you. You make things up and that isn't science.

It is really a matter of making stuff up and acting like your undegreed opinion "should" matter. Well, it doesn't. If Spencer can't find this non-warming you say then who are you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top