WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #361
...Besides, you keep ignoring that taking the vote away from women requires a constitutional amendment.
The president can't just order it done.
Actually it will simply be left out of the new American Constitution when we rewrite the document after the Conservative Revolution.
And you think even a simple majority will vote in favor of not having a right to vote? Good luck with that.
No I don't think people will agree to what is good and right.
I think it is wrong to allow people who do not contribute, or who directly benefit from the government to have a vote on things that will destroy the entire country.
We saw this is Greece. Greece was not a fluke. People had been warning that the entitlements and government programs of Greece was absolutely unsustainable. But because so many people benefited from pillaging the nation, every time the people who knew what was going on, tried reform the system to avoid eventual destruction of the country.... the public voted heavily against it.
Well, all the number crunchers were dead on right, and the entire public living off the government, found out they were wrong.
Same is true of Venezuela. Everyone predicted everything that happened in Venezuela, including people in Venezuela. But the people with the least invested in the country, voted to destroy those who had the most invested in the country.
Right now in the US, we know for a fact that Medicare and Social Security will clearly eventually destroy the country.
It's not really up for debate except by those who ignore basic math, just like the people in Greece ignored math, and the people in Venezuela ignored math.
The same group of people who destroyed those countries, is now in the process of destroying our country.
There is a huge danger in giving people who have nothing to lose, or people who live off the largess of the government, access to how the entire country is run.
The irony of this, is that in any other context, everyone, including yourself and every left-winger in the country, would instinctively understand this concept.
For example, if the CEO, or the entire executive board of Boeing, was on the committee that approved government contracts.... we would all understand that there is a huge conflict of interest, between the interest of the entire country, and the interest of the person collecting government money.
But what is the difference between that situation, and someone voting on whoever will continue to give them money at home? Nothing. It's the same conflict of interest between what is best for the entire country, and the interest of the individual living off the government.
So back to the main point... I would agree with you that the public will never vote to limit who can vote. I agree.
But I would still say that it is obvious that they should.
A logic ability test for voters is the only way to save the nation
Since trump has the men on his side. He now has that power to save the nation by declaring s broken govt and setting up logic tests for voting
Nope, he doesn't have the authority or power. And the men may be with him so far, but when he violated the US Constitution like that, they will abandon him.
Besides, do you think Trump has an IQ of 125? lol