The problem here is that these nutters want to employ working class children so they can earn money to help their hard-working parents feed and clothe them.
There is no mention of wealthy children working in a similar manner.
I worked in Japan for several years......a couple of them in a Japanese High School. The students there spend a few minutes each day cleaning the classrooms and common areas.....including restrooms. They are not paid....and ALL students are involved, regardless of their economic status.
In every Japanese neighborhood......rich and poor alike meet up twice per year to tend to overgrown lots and clean up river banks, etc. Nobody is paid......but if you don't participate, you are expected to pay up in lieu of your labor.
That is how one is taught personal responsibility...........not by trading labor for food. Assholes.
And now it's time for today's episode of "What's Wrong With This Liberal Argument?"
The problem, my friend, is that you responded to a point that assumed that people who need money would take paying jobs with an example of charity where there was no assumption that people who need money would do it, everyone does.
Hmm...people who need money will take paying jobs, people who don't volunteer to clean up the community. Wow, you're onto something there. Note you actually gave an excellent example of my point that liberals actually do not want to equate work with money....