Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The pathetic loser STILL craves my attention. I wonder how long you’re going to keep this going. This is just sad. Seriously.Lol
Sure.
Meanwhile, ask your question on the form of a question.
Or don’t. I understand you hate the process of being pinned down.
Back. Get back. I’m just not interested in little girls. I don’t care how cute you think you are.The pathetic loser STILL craves my attention. I wonder how long you’re going to keep this going. This is just sad. Seriously.
You should consider re-evaluating your decisions when you’re resorting to this.
I’m not a girl and you’re this desperate to get my attention about nothing.Back. Get back. I’m just not interested in little girls. I don’t care how cute you think you are.
Stop stalking me!I’m not a girl and you’re this desperate to get my attention about nothing.
Seriously, re-evaluate your life. This is honestly pathetic.
We both know you initiated this, not me.Stop stalking me!
You’re following me like a little bitch.We both know you initiated this, not me.
And you’re still going. Sad and pathetic.
Oh I didn’t initiate this. You did. You wanted my attention and you had nothing to say.You’re following me like a little bitch.
Follow follow followOh I didn’t initiate this. You did.
And you’re still going about nothing. Holy shit. This is honestly just sad at this point.
Still going.Follow follow follow
You’re a gutless little x.Still going.
You’re a sad, pathetic little man.
One problem we have is that conservatives have no coherent theory of what we might call 'the legitimate welfare state'. So they end up mouthing the libertarian position on it -- it's all bad, the government should not do anything in this field, leave it to private individuals and groups -- while simultaneously accepting the welfare state proposals advanced by the Left, occasonally trying to modify them a bit.The best way to defeat the democrats is to elect a decent, conservative president and give him enough conservative congressmen to really help conservatism. This country hasn't had a fiscal conservative president in so long. Most of the people 50 and under have never seen one. They think that all republicans are conservative.
It's not what the Lincoln Project says about Trump -- most of which is true -- it's the conclusions they draw from these facts: it's better to have the Democrats in power.While I don't agree with Trump attacking DeSantis this post reads like something from the Lincoln Project
What we need is a conscious examination of the problems the welfare state has evolved to address, and then the formulation of a program for a 'conservative welfare state', one which would, for example, encourage the maintenance of traditional families. We sort of had this happen when we went from 'Aid to Families with Dependent Children' to 'Temporary Assisstance to Needy Families', but I don't think the latter has worked out very well.
thehill.com
And you’re STILL going. Desperately seeking my attention about nothing.You’re a gutless little x.
Now, get cowarding. Your panties aren’t going to piss themselves.
And when you want to know why, just remember to phrase your question in the form of a question.
Trump did a lot of good things no one gives him credit for like passing the Mission Act which as helped numerous veterans that I know personallyIt's not what the Lincoln Project says about Trump -- most of which is true -- it's the conclusions they draw from these facts: it's better to have the Democrats in power.
I'm sure you could have found corrupt, dishonest officers among the Allies in WWII, and German officers who were of sterling personal character, as Erwin Rommel was supposed to be. So what?
The Democrats are probably embarrassed by Al Sharpton. It's hard to see their nominating him as their Presidential candidate, but not impossible to see him as their Vice Presidential nominee. And were that to happen, they'd vote for him and call anyone who didn't a "racist".
I don't know if YoursTruly would vote for Trump, but that's what we should do if he's the nominee. (FDR said of the dictator of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo., "He may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch." [ Rafael Trujillo - Wikipedia ] Same-same, except that Mr Trump is an angel compared to Trujillo.)
One problem we have is that conservatives have no coherent theory of what we might call 'the legitimate welfare state'. So they end up mouthing the libertarian position on it -- it's all bad, the government should not do anything in this field, leave it to private individuals and groups -- while simultaneously accepting the welfare state proposals advanced by the Left, occasonally trying to modify them a bit.
A case in point: are we for, or against, the existing Social Security (old-age pension) system? In practice, Republicans support it. An ovewhelming Republican majority in Congress and Republican control of the Presidency would NOT see the Social Security system repealed -- only modified a bit, as George Bush tried to do.
But since the Social Security system, which forces individuals to contribute to their own retirement, is 'socialist' ... conservatives can't openly embrace it. (It's sort of symmetrical to what the Left has done with respect to genuine socialism -- since full government ownership and control of the means of production and distribution has been such a spectacular failure wherever it was tried, few socialists today advocate it. They in fact accept capitalism, and just want to make it 'fairer'.)
What we need is a conscious examination of the problems the welfare state has evolved to address, and then the formulation of a program for a 'conservative welfare state', one which would, for example, encourage the maintenance of traditional families. We sort of had this happen when we went from 'Aid to Families with Dependent Children' to 'Temporary Assisstance to Needy Families', but I don't think the latter has worked out very well.
I don't know if YoursTruly would vote for Trump, but that's what we should do if he's the nominee. (FDR said of the dictator of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo., "He may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch." [ Rafael Trujillo - Wikipedia ] Same-same, except that Mr Trump is an angel compared to Trujillo.)
Stop following me! You’re a special kind of weird and you’re also very dumb.And you’re STILL going. Desperately seeking my attention about nothing.
What a remarkable display of how truly pathetic you are. This is what you choose to do with your life lmao.
Conservativism is what build this nation. Even with the Federal Reserve, conservative's (Rep and Dems) kept a close watch on the national debt. Only borrowed when it was absolutely necessary. It was this way all the way up until Reagan.
We build a massive middle class, made huge technological advances in all sort of different industries. Especially in medicine and computers. We were the most industrious nation in the world, all because our government kept our USD and it's value in check.
It wasn't until Reagan came along, with his RINO's and started treating the Fed like an unlimited credit card and started decimating the value of the dollar, by pumping trillions of borrowed dollars into the economy. This devalued our currency and forced higher wages on employers, which caused the price of everything to go up. Which caused even higher wages. Rinse and repeat all the way up to 2023.
I wouldn't vote for either of them. Because neither of them are fiscally conservative.
I like Rand Paul. And consider him a conservative. But the GOP outlawed conservatism when Reagan became president.
