Getting cancelled by Trump supporters

[XponentialChaos]

Lol

Sure.

Meanwhile, ask your question on the form of a question.

Or don’t. I understand you hate the process of being pinned down.

The pathetic loser STILL craves my attention. I wonder how long you’re going to keep this going. This is just sad. Seriously.

You should consider re-evaluating your decisions when you’re resorting to this.

 

[BackAgain]

The pathetic loser STILL craves my attention. I wonder how long you’re going to keep this going. This is just sad. Seriously.

You should consider re-evaluating your decisions when you’re resorting to this.

Back. Get back. I’m just not interested in little girls. I don’t care how cute you think you are.

Anyway, I see you’re too pussy to ever ask the question in the form of a question.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Back. Get back. I’m just not interested in little girls. I don’t care how cute you think you are.

I’m not a girl and you’re this desperate to get my attention about nothing.

Seriously, re-evaluate your life. This is honestly pathetic.

 

[BackAgain]

I’m not a girl and you’re this desperate to get my attention about nothing.

Seriously, re-evaluate your life. This is honestly pathetic.

Stop stalking me!

Hey, little x. Look. You’re a pussy.

It’s understood.

You don’t care to phrase your question in the form of a question. It’s all good. No worries. Go away now.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Stop stalking me!

We both know you initiated this, not me.

And you’re still going. Sad and pathetic.

 

[BackAgain]

We both know you initiated this, not me.

And you’re still going. Sad and pathetic.

You’re following me like a little bitch.

And the record speaks for itself.

You are quite obviously a phony. You must be a lib.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You’re following me like a little bitch.

Oh I didn’t initiate this. You did. You wanted my attention and you had nothing to say.

And you’re still going about nothing. This is honestly just sad at this point.

 

[BackAgain]

Oh I didn’t initiate this. You did.

And you’re still going about nothing. Holy shit. This is honestly just sad at this point.

Follow follow follow

That’s all you, x

I’m thinking of putting up a wanted poster as a favor to you.

Reward
for Little X’s balls.
He is very frustrated without them.

If found, please contact the guy who
refused to phrase the question
in the form of a question​

 

[XponentialChaos]

Follow follow follow

Still going.

You’re a sad, pathetic little man.

 

[BackAgain]

Still going.

You’re a sad, pathetic little man.

You’re a gutless little x.

Now, get cowarding. Your panties aren’t going to piss themselves.

And when you want to know why, just remember to phrase your question in the form of a question.

 

[Doug1943]

The best way to defeat the democrats is to elect a decent, conservative president and give him enough conservative congressmen to really help conservatism. This country hasn't had a fiscal conservative president in so long. Most of the people 50 and under have never seen one. They think that all republicans are conservative.

One problem we have is that conservatives have no coherent theory of what we might call 'the legitimate welfare state'. So they end up mouthing the libertarian position on it -- it's all bad, the government should not do anything in this field, leave it to private individuals and groups -- while simultaneously accepting the welfare state proposals advanced by the Left, occasonally trying to modify them a bit.

A case in point: are we for, or against, the existing Social Security (old-age pension) system? In practice, Republicans support it. An ovewhelming Republican majority in Congress and Republican control of the Presidency would NOT see the Social Security system repealed -- only modified a bit, as George Bush tried to do.

But since the Social Security system, which forces individuals to contribute to their own retirement, is 'socialist' ... conservatives can't openly embrace it. (It's sort of symmetrical to what the Left has done with respect to genuine socialism -- since full government ownership and control of the means of production and distribution has been such a spectacular failure wherever it was tried, few socialists today advocate it. They in fact accept capitalism, and just want to make it 'fairer'.)

What we need is a conscious examination of the problems the welfare state has evolved to address, and then the formulation of a program for a 'conservative welfare state', one which would, for example, encourage the maintenance of traditional families. We sort of had this happen when we went from 'Aid to Families with Dependent Children' to 'Temporary Assisstance to Needy Families', but I don't think the latter has worked out very well.

 

[Doug1943]

While I don't agree with Trump attacking DeSantis this post reads like something from the Lincoln Project

It's not what the Lincoln Project says about Trump -- most of which is true -- it's the conclusions they draw from these facts: it's better to have the Democrats in power.

I'm sure you could have found corrupt, dishonest officers among the Allies in WWII, and German officers who were of sterling personal character, as Erwin Rommel was supposed to be. So what?

The Democrats are probably embarrassed by Al Sharpton. It's hard to see their nominating him as their Presidential candidate, but not impossible to see him as their Vice Presidential nominee. And were that to happen, they'd vote for him and call anyone who didn't a "racist".

I don't know if YoursTruly would vote for Trump, but that's what we should do if he's the nominee. (FDR said of the dictator of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo., "He may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch." [ Rafael Trujillo - Wikipedia ] Same-same, except that Mr Trump is an angel compared to Trujillo.)

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What we need is a conscious examination of the problems the welfare state has evolved to address, and then the formulation of a program for a 'conservative welfare state', one which would, for example, encourage the maintenance of traditional families. We sort of had this happen when we went from 'Aid to Families with Dependent Children' to 'Temporary Assisstance to Needy Families', but I don't think the latter has worked out very well.

Social programs is what keeps or gets Democrats in power. Dare anybody go near them is political suicide and the MSM will make sure of that. This is why the Democrat party is always trying to think of ways to make more Americans dependent on the federal government. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.

Joe Biden, welfare king

Biden’s record of success growing the economy is at best questionable. His record of exploding the welfare rolls is undeniable.

thehill.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

You’re a gutless little x.

Now, get cowarding. Your panties aren’t going to piss themselves.

And when you want to know why, just remember to phrase your question in the form of a question.

And you’re STILL going. Desperately seeking my attention about nothing.

What a remarkable display of how truly pathetic you are. This is what you choose to do with your life lmao.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

It's not what the Lincoln Project says about Trump -- most of which is true -- it's the conclusions they draw from these facts: it's better to have the Democrats in power.

I'm sure you could have found corrupt, dishonest officers among the Allies in WWII, and German officers who were of sterling personal character, as Erwin Rommel was supposed to be. So what?

The Democrats are probably embarrassed by Al Sharpton. It's hard to see their nominating him as their Presidential candidate, but not impossible to see him as their Vice Presidential nominee. And were that to happen, they'd vote for him and call anyone who didn't a "racist".

I don't know if YoursTruly would vote for Trump, but that's what we should do if he's the nominee. (FDR said of the dictator of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo., "He may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch." [ Rafael Trujillo - Wikipedia ] Same-same, except that Mr Trump is an angel compared to Trujillo.)

Trump did a lot of good things no one gives him credit for like passing the Mission Act which as helped numerous veterans that I know personally

He did some things I don't agree with either

I still he should have 4 more years to turn things around and get us where we were before the covid hoax happened and ruined our strong economy

I also really like DeSantis, he's been the beat governor in the nation and would make a fine president

All this infighting does nothing to help our side and only bolsters attacks against us

Trump in 24
DeSantis in 28

 

[YoursTruly]

One problem we have is that conservatives have no coherent theory of what we might call 'the legitimate welfare state'. So they end up mouthing the libertarian position on it -- it's all bad, the government should not do anything in this field, leave it to private individuals and groups -- while simultaneously accepting the welfare state proposals advanced by the Left, occasonally trying to modify them a bit.

A case in point: are we for, or against, the existing Social Security (old-age pension) system? In practice, Republicans support it. An ovewhelming Republican majority in Congress and Republican control of the Presidency would NOT see the Social Security system repealed -- only modified a bit, as George Bush tried to do.

But since the Social Security system, which forces individuals to contribute to their own retirement, is 'socialist' ... conservatives can't openly embrace it. (It's sort of symmetrical to what the Left has done with respect to genuine socialism -- since full government ownership and control of the means of production and distribution has been such a spectacular failure wherever it was tried, few socialists today advocate it. They in fact accept capitalism, and just want to make it 'fairer'.)

What we need is a conscious examination of the problems the welfare state has evolved to address, and then the formulation of a program for a 'conservative welfare state', one which would, for example, encourage the maintenance of traditional families. We sort of had this happen when we went from 'Aid to Families with Dependent Children' to 'Temporary Assisstance to Needy Families', but I don't think the latter has worked out very well.

It's just my idea that SS and Medicare should stay out of the discussion, except for correcting the fraud and abuses. There's a gazillion $$$ of fraud and waste in almost every program and agency. Just look at the last 6 omnibus bills. A million here, a couple million there. All for stupid crap like gender studies, or reproductive system of worms.
Building things for the military, that the military doesn't actually need. There's so many unimportant things that need to be cut. Like the whole "use it or lose it" money.
I say we start with that, take a step back and see where we are. That's the conservative approach.

Not to change the subject, but one thing that irks me about the R & D's, is they always claim the other side is "coming for you _________." Republicans say the democrats are coming for your gun. Democrats say the GOP is coming for your social security."

 

[YoursTruly]

I don't know if YoursTruly would vote for Trump, but that's what we should do if he's the nominee. (FDR said of the dictator of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo., "He may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch." [ Rafael Trujillo - Wikipedia ] Same-same, except that Mr Trump is an angel compared to Trujillo.)

No, I would not vote for Trump. He's simply too liberal for me.

 

[BackAgain]

And you’re STILL going. Desperately seeking my attention about nothing.

What a remarkable display of how truly pathetic you are. This is what you choose to do with your life lmao.

Stop following me! You’re a special kind of weird and you’re also very dumb.

So, if you have any (unjustified) sense of self respect, phrase your question in the form of a legitimate question.

 

[Billiejeens]

Conservativism is what build this nation. Even with the Federal Reserve, conservative's (Rep and Dems) kept a close watch on the national debt. Only borrowed when it was absolutely necessary. It was this way all the way up until Reagan.
We build a massive middle class, made huge technological advances in all sort of different industries. Especially in medicine and computers. We were the most industrious nation in the world, all because our government kept our USD and it's value in check.
It wasn't until Reagan came along, with his RINO's and started treating the Fed like an unlimited credit card and started decimating the value of the dollar, by pumping trillions of borrowed dollars into the economy. This devalued our currency and forced higher wages on employers, which caused the price of everything to go up. Which caused even higher wages. Rinse and repeat all the way up to 2023.


I wouldn't vote for either of them. Because neither of them are fiscally conservative.

One issue voters.

Bleck.

 

[Billiejeens]

I like Rand Paul. And consider him a conservative. But the GOP outlawed conservatism when Reagan became president.

Okay
My bad
Your simply an idiot.
I dismiss you.