Georgia Goes To Biden, Election Called Biden Defeats Trump 306-232, Becomes 46th President

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
887
Points
920
Trump was bought. When you are a businessman, everything has a price. Even America.
But....the 1.5 billion China gave the Bidens......was proper.

You speak like a well greased assclown.

That's what made Trump unique....he didn't need their money.
If he didn’t need money why did he steer millions of dollars in taxpayer money to his businesses?

If he didn’t need THEIR money why does he maintain a Chinese bank account?

hmmmmmm
Are you talking Trump...

In order to do business in china---------you need a chinese bank account..tired of the lib talking point about this
businessmen steer business to their business-that is the point of being a businessman isn't it
Business in China.
1. ok for Trump

2. not ok for Biden


makes no sense.
Maybe because the "Biden Business" was political favors? (snicker)
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,948
Reaction score
21,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Trump was bought. When you are a businessman, everything has a price. Even America.
But....the 1.5 billion China gave the Bidens......was proper.

You speak like a well greased assclown.

That's what made Trump unique....he didn't need their money.
If he didn’t need money why did he steer millions of dollars in taxpayer money to his businesses?

If he didn’t need THEIR money why does he maintain a Chinese bank account?

hmmmmmm
Are you talking Trump...

In order to do business in china---------you need a chinese bank account..tired of the lib talking point about this
businessmen steer business to their business-that is the point of being a businessman isn't it
Business in China.
1. ok for Trump

2. not ok for Biden


makes no sense.
Maybe because the "Biden Business" was political favors? (snicker)
or maybe Trump's was....
 

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
887
Points
920
Trump was bought. When you are a businessman, everything has a price. Even America.
But....the 1.5 billion China gave the Bidens......was proper.

You speak like a well greased assclown.

That's what made Trump unique....he didn't need their money.
If he didn’t need money why did he steer millions of dollars in taxpayer money to his businesses?

If he didn’t need THEIR money why does he maintain a Chinese bank account?

hmmmmmm
Are you talking Trump...

In order to do business in china---------you need a chinese bank account..tired of the lib talking point about this
businessmen steer business to their business-that is the point of being a businessman isn't it
Business in China.
1. ok for Trump

2. not ok for Biden


makes no sense.
Maybe because the "Biden Business" was political favors? (snicker)
or maybe Trump's was....
Possible. But Trump ,unlike Biden ,was a PRIVATE CITIZEN while doing that business. Biden has NEVER been a Private Citizen. Note the Difference.
 

Flopper

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
25,450
Reaction score
5,597
Points
280
Location
Washington
Getting back to politicians acting like politicians and a normal news cycle will do to begin with. I don't know what reality you live in but Biden is a career politician and a centrist. He's also a dealmaker. I have a feeling things will not play out as you think they will. But I'm glad you're entering the "acceptance" phase of grief. Not healthy to dwell on a loss.
Dealmaker? Biden ??

Yeah, he's a dealmaker alright....

He made a deal that gave Iran nukes that they point directly at YOU

And he delivered tons of American business interest and trade secrets directly to China. they LOVE him.

C'mon man! Are you really this stupid ??? (Or just another Chinese troll pretending to be an American)
Iran has been a non-nuclear weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) since 1970. At the time Trump cancelled the nuclear agreement, Iran had no nuclear weapons and was producing nuclear fuel for nuclear reactors at rate proscribed by treaty. Today there is no treaty with US. Being free of that treaty allows them to produce nuclear fuel as they please and pursue development of nuclear weapons and the Trump administration has not been able to come to any agreement with Iran.
If they develope or attempt to develope weapons grade plutonium or create nuclear weapons outside of any treaty or laws granting them such a thing (which would never happen), Iran knows full well that it would be signing it's very own death warrant. We don't need a treaty with Iran to stop them from creating weapons of mass destruction, because they know better than to attempt it and us find out about it (and we have many ways of finding out about it), so the bullcrap of we need to have a treaty with Iran in order to detour them is bullcrap, but of course the left needs some kind of win in foriegn affairs, so try and create one is their thinking.
If US attacked Iran without a treaty violation, it would be another Bush WMD fiasco.
Walking out on the treaty has gained us nothing. It just made it easier for Iran to violate the terms of the treaty which other signers are still apart. Bush said he was going to negotiate a new and better treaty which never happen. Biden said he will attempt to rejoin the treaty.
Whoa up there....why are you acting like Iran hasn't always violated the terms of the TREATIES---

Iran has never behaved as well as they have under Trump who they fear will thump them.
Trump's reason for walking out on the agreement had nothing to do with agreement violations. Iran was meeting requirements and it was being verified by inspectors. Trump backed out of the agreement because of terrorist activities in Iraq, development of short ranged missiles and attacks directed at Israel. Nothing was accomplished by Trump backing out on the agreement except driving the US and Iran closer to military action. I suppose that must have been Trump's intention.

Biden says he'll reentry the agreement with Iran. I doubt that will happen. Iran has made it clear they will not sign any executive agreements with a US president. In fact, Biden and future presidents are going to have problems making any executive agreements because Trump has made it clear that the US does not honor those agreements. In short, why waste the effort on an agreement with an American president when the next president is most likely going cancel it. This is just more damage Trump has done to country, damage that is not going to be easy to repair.
Jusus lib! RU really that non compos mentis? Friking bloody unreal. Only a weak kneed liberal POS like obama would have even considered such a treaty. Plus u and those like u appear to be just as bad. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES IRAN BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS – Iran 911 Case.
Whether Iran was party to the 911 attack 19 years ago is totally irrelevant to the cancellation of the agreement. There is no evidence that cancelling the agreement has improved Iranian behavior.

The fact is Donald Trump has cancelled a number executive agreements with many countries, simply because he doesn't like the agreement or they were by Obama. He promised to make new bilateral agreements but with the exception of Japan he has failed to do so. On of the major reasons is that other nations do not trust the US to live up to their agreements, in no small part do to Trump. I expect it will take Biden at least a year to undue the damage Trump has done. If the only thing he is able to do is to restore trust in US and reassert American leadership in the world, he will have done a good job.
Since all agreements by Obama sucked ,it was wise to get out of 'em. Obama is a traitor.
As Trump tried to erase every he could that Obama did, Biden will do that to Trump, and the next republican will do that to Biden, etc... and the net gain is zero and American continues down the rabbit hole.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,948
Reaction score
21,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Trump was bought. When you are a businessman, everything has a price. Even America.
But....the 1.5 billion China gave the Bidens......was proper.

You speak like a well greased assclown.

That's what made Trump unique....he didn't need their money.
If he didn’t need money why did he steer millions of dollars in taxpayer money to his businesses?

If he didn’t need THEIR money why does he maintain a Chinese bank account?

hmmmmmm
Are you talking Trump...

In order to do business in china---------you need a chinese bank account..tired of the lib talking point about this
businessmen steer business to their business-that is the point of being a businessman isn't it
Business in China.
1. ok for Trump

2. not ok for Biden


makes no sense.
Maybe because the "Biden Business" was political favors? (snicker)
or maybe Trump's was....
Possible. But Trump ,unlike Biden ,was a PRIVATE CITIZEN while doing that business. Biden has NEVER been a Private Citizen. Note the Difference.
Hunter Biden was and is a private citizen.

Joe Biden has been a private citiz4n for the past 4 years.

No evidence that Joe Biden received any money from China.
 

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
887
Points
920
Trump was bought. When you are a businessman, everything has a price. Even America.
But....the 1.5 billion China gave the Bidens......was proper.

You speak like a well greased assclown.

That's what made Trump unique....he didn't need their money.
If he didn’t need money why did he steer millions of dollars in taxpayer money to his businesses?

If he didn’t need THEIR money why does he maintain a Chinese bank account?

hmmmmmm
Are you talking Trump...

In order to do business in china---------you need a chinese bank account..tired of the lib talking point about this
businessmen steer business to their business-that is the point of being a businessman isn't it
Business in China.
1. ok for Trump

2. not ok for Biden


makes no sense.
Maybe because the "Biden Business" was political favors? (snicker)
or maybe Trump's was....
Possible. But Trump ,unlike Biden ,was a PRIVATE CITIZEN while doing that business. Biden has NEVER been a Private Citizen. Note the Difference.
Hunter Biden was and is a private citizen.

Joe Biden has been a private citiz4n for the past 4 years.

No evidence that Joe Biden received any money from China.
Plenty of Evidence about "The Big Guy". Also ,seems someone from MOSCOW also contributed 3 Million. Hmmmmm. Russia 2? Now THAT would be FUNNY. Also a bit of Karma.
 

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
887
Points
920
Getting back to politicians acting like politicians and a normal news cycle will do to begin with. I don't know what reality you live in but Biden is a career politician and a centrist. He's also a dealmaker. I have a feeling things will not play out as you think they will. But I'm glad you're entering the "acceptance" phase of grief. Not healthy to dwell on a loss.
Dealmaker? Biden ??

Yeah, he's a dealmaker alright....

He made a deal that gave Iran nukes that they point directly at YOU

And he delivered tons of American business interest and trade secrets directly to China. they LOVE him.

C'mon man! Are you really this stupid ??? (Or just another Chinese troll pretending to be an American)
Iran has been a non-nuclear weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) since 1970. At the time Trump cancelled the nuclear agreement, Iran had no nuclear weapons and was producing nuclear fuel for nuclear reactors at rate proscribed by treaty. Today there is no treaty with US. Being free of that treaty allows them to produce nuclear fuel as they please and pursue development of nuclear weapons and the Trump administration has not been able to come to any agreement with Iran.
If they develope or attempt to develope weapons grade plutonium or create nuclear weapons outside of any treaty or laws granting them such a thing (which would never happen), Iran knows full well that it would be signing it's very own death warrant. We don't need a treaty with Iran to stop them from creating weapons of mass destruction, because they know better than to attempt it and us find out about it (and we have many ways of finding out about it), so the bullcrap of we need to have a treaty with Iran in order to detour them is bullcrap, but of course the left needs some kind of win in foriegn affairs, so try and create one is their thinking.
If US attacked Iran without a treaty violation, it would be another Bush WMD fiasco.
Walking out on the treaty has gained us nothing. It just made it easier for Iran to violate the terms of the treaty which other signers are still apart. Bush said he was going to negotiate a new and better treaty which never happen. Biden said he will attempt to rejoin the treaty.
Whoa up there....why are you acting like Iran hasn't always violated the terms of the TREATIES---

Iran has never behaved as well as they have under Trump who they fear will thump them.
Trump's reason for walking out on the agreement had nothing to do with agreement violations. Iran was meeting requirements and it was being verified by inspectors. Trump backed out of the agreement because of terrorist activities in Iraq, development of short ranged missiles and attacks directed at Israel. Nothing was accomplished by Trump backing out on the agreement except driving the US and Iran closer to military action. I suppose that must have been Trump's intention.

Biden says he'll reentry the agreement with Iran. I doubt that will happen. Iran has made it clear they will not sign any executive agreements with a US president. In fact, Biden and future presidents are going to have problems making any executive agreements because Trump has made it clear that the US does not honor those agreements. In short, why waste the effort on an agreement with an American president when the next president is most likely going cancel it. This is just more damage Trump has done to country, damage that is not going to be easy to repair.
Jusus lib! RU really that non compos mentis? Friking bloody unreal. Only a weak kneed liberal POS like obama would have even considered such a treaty. Plus u and those like u appear to be just as bad. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES IRAN BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS – Iran 911 Case.
Whether Iran was party to the 911 attack 19 years ago is totally irrelevant to the cancellation of the agreement. There is no evidence that cancelling the agreement has improved Iranian behavior.

The fact is Donald Trump has cancelled a number executive agreements with many countries, simply because he doesn't like the agreement or they were by Obama. He promised to make new bilateral agreements but with the exception of Japan he has failed to do so. On of the major reasons is that other nations do not trust the US to live up to their agreements, in no small part do to Trump. I expect it will take Biden at least a year to undue the damage Trump has done. If the only thing he is able to do is to restore trust in US and reassert American leadership in the world, he will have done a good job.
Since all agreements by Obama sucked ,it was wise to get out of 'em. Obama is a traitor.
As Trump tried to erase every he could that Obama did, Biden will do that to Trump, and the next republican will do that to Biden, etc... and the net gain is zero and American continues down the rabbit hole.
Unless the next Repub is Trump. He CAN run again. He could declare on January 21st. That would sure keep the MEDIA busy! (hehe)
 

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,598
Reaction score
4,978
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
United States on Nov. 7. Mr. Biden defeated President Trump after winning Pennsylvania, which put his total of Electoral College votes above the 270 he needed to clinch the presidency.
306
Biden
Winner
232
Trump
270TO WIN

Only the state legislatures can ensure certification
Wise up
 

Flopper

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
25,450
Reaction score
5,597
Points
280
Location
Washington
Getting back to politicians acting like politicians and a normal news cycle will do to begin with. I don't know what reality you live in but Biden is a career politician and a centrist. He's also a dealmaker. I have a feeling things will not play out as you think they will. But I'm glad you're entering the "acceptance" phase of grief. Not healthy to dwell on a loss.
Dealmaker? Biden ??

Yeah, he's a dealmaker alright....

He made a deal that gave Iran nukes that they point directly at YOU

And he delivered tons of American business interest and trade secrets directly to China. they LOVE him.

C'mon man! Are you really this stupid ??? (Or just another Chinese troll pretending to be an American)
Iran has been a non-nuclear weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) since 1970. At the time Trump cancelled the nuclear agreement, Iran had no nuclear weapons and was producing nuclear fuel for nuclear reactors at rate proscribed by treaty. Today there is no treaty with US. Being free of that treaty allows them to produce nuclear fuel as they please and pursue development of nuclear weapons and the Trump administration has not been able to come to any agreement with Iran.
If they develope or attempt to develope weapons grade plutonium or create nuclear weapons outside of any treaty or laws granting them such a thing (which would never happen), Iran knows full well that it would be signing it's very own death warrant. We don't need a treaty with Iran to stop them from creating weapons of mass destruction, because they know better than to attempt it and us find out about it (and we have many ways of finding out about it), so the bullcrap of we need to have a treaty with Iran in order to detour them is bullcrap, but of course the left needs some kind of win in foriegn affairs, so try and create one is their thinking.
If US attacked Iran without a treaty violation, it would be another Bush WMD fiasco.
Walking out on the treaty has gained us nothing. It just made it easier for Iran to violate the terms of the treaty which other signers are still apart. Bush said he was going to negotiate a new and better treaty which never happen. Biden said he will attempt to rejoin the treaty.
Whoa up there....why are you acting like Iran hasn't always violated the terms of the TREATIES---

Iran has never behaved as well as they have under Trump who they fear will thump them.
Trump's reason for walking out on the agreement had nothing to do with agreement violations. Iran was meeting requirements and it was being verified by inspectors. Trump backed out of the agreement because of terrorist activities in Iraq, development of short ranged missiles and attacks directed at Israel. Nothing was accomplished by Trump backing out on the agreement except driving the US and Iran closer to military action. I suppose that must have been Trump's intention.

Biden says he'll reentry the agreement with Iran. I doubt that will happen. Iran has made it clear they will not sign any executive agreements with a US president. In fact, Biden and future presidents are going to have problems making any executive agreements because Trump has made it clear that the US does not honor those agreements. In short, why waste the effort on an agreement with an American president when the next president is most likely going cancel it. This is just more damage Trump has done to country, damage that is not going to be easy to repair.
Jusus lib! RU really that non compos mentis? Friking bloody unreal. Only a weak kneed liberal POS like obama would have even considered such a treaty. Plus u and those like u appear to be just as bad. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES IRAN BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS – Iran 911 Case.
Whether Iran was party to the 911 attack 19 years ago is totally irrelevant to the cancellation of the agreement. There is no evidence that cancelling the agreement has improved Iranian behavior.

The fact is Donald Trump has cancelled a number executive agreements with many countries, simply because he doesn't like the agreement or they were by Obama. He promised to make new bilateral agreements but with the exception of Japan he has failed to do so. On of the major reasons is that other nations do not trust the US to live up to their agreements, in no small part do to Trump. I expect it will take Biden at least a year to undue the damage Trump has done. If the only thing he is able to do is to restore trust in US and reassert American leadership in the world, he will have done a good job.
Since all agreements by Obama sucked ,it was wise to get out of 'em. Obama is a traitor.
As Trump tried to erase every he could that Obama did, Biden will do that to Trump, and the next republican will do that to Biden, etc... and the net gain is zero and American continues down the rabbit hole.
Unless the next Repub is Trump. He CAN run again. He could declare on January 21st. That would sure keep the MEDIA busy! (hehe)
I suspect he will dance around not making it offical until the last minute. Trying to actually run a campaign for 4 years would be a huge cost and would likely lose momentum. He will most probably tweet he's going to run, thinking about running, making promises, implying a run, and generally staying in the media spotlight. That would mean he will be having rallies, making regular appearances on TV, running an ongoing battle with the administration, and giving his opinion on just about everything. But will he actually officially announce his campaign in about 3 year? I doubt anyone even Trump can answer that question. As most people are aware, Trump loves the campaigning, but doesn't really like being president. As a friend of mine who worked on the Goldwater campaign many years ago said, "One of the primary reasons an incumbent get's voted out of office is voters want a change" Trump and Biden will both be insiders, seasoned politicians with nothing new to offer.
 

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
887
Points
920
Getting back to politicians acting like politicians and a normal news cycle will do to begin with. I don't know what reality you live in but Biden is a career politician and a centrist. He's also a dealmaker. I have a feeling things will not play out as you think they will. But I'm glad you're entering the "acceptance" phase of grief. Not healthy to dwell on a loss.
Dealmaker? Biden ??

Yeah, he's a dealmaker alright....

He made a deal that gave Iran nukes that they point directly at YOU

And he delivered tons of American business interest and trade secrets directly to China. they LOVE him.

C'mon man! Are you really this stupid ??? (Or just another Chinese troll pretending to be an American)
Iran has been a non-nuclear weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) since 1970. At the time Trump cancelled the nuclear agreement, Iran had no nuclear weapons and was producing nuclear fuel for nuclear reactors at rate proscribed by treaty. Today there is no treaty with US. Being free of that treaty allows them to produce nuclear fuel as they please and pursue development of nuclear weapons and the Trump administration has not been able to come to any agreement with Iran.
If they develope or attempt to develope weapons grade plutonium or create nuclear weapons outside of any treaty or laws granting them such a thing (which would never happen), Iran knows full well that it would be signing it's very own death warrant. We don't need a treaty with Iran to stop them from creating weapons of mass destruction, because they know better than to attempt it and us find out about it (and we have many ways of finding out about it), so the bullcrap of we need to have a treaty with Iran in order to detour them is bullcrap, but of course the left needs some kind of win in foriegn affairs, so try and create one is their thinking.
If US attacked Iran without a treaty violation, it would be another Bush WMD fiasco.
Walking out on the treaty has gained us nothing. It just made it easier for Iran to violate the terms of the treaty which other signers are still apart. Bush said he was going to negotiate a new and better treaty which never happen. Biden said he will attempt to rejoin the treaty.
Whoa up there....why are you acting like Iran hasn't always violated the terms of the TREATIES---

Iran has never behaved as well as they have under Trump who they fear will thump them.
Trump's reason for walking out on the agreement had nothing to do with agreement violations. Iran was meeting requirements and it was being verified by inspectors. Trump backed out of the agreement because of terrorist activities in Iraq, development of short ranged missiles and attacks directed at Israel. Nothing was accomplished by Trump backing out on the agreement except driving the US and Iran closer to military action. I suppose that must have been Trump's intention.

Biden says he'll reentry the agreement with Iran. I doubt that will happen. Iran has made it clear they will not sign any executive agreements with a US president. In fact, Biden and future presidents are going to have problems making any executive agreements because Trump has made it clear that the US does not honor those agreements. In short, why waste the effort on an agreement with an American president when the next president is most likely going cancel it. This is just more damage Trump has done to country, damage that is not going to be easy to repair.
Jusus lib! RU really that non compos mentis? Friking bloody unreal. Only a weak kneed liberal POS like obama would have even considered such a treaty. Plus u and those like u appear to be just as bad. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES IRAN BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS – Iran 911 Case.
Whether Iran was party to the 911 attack 19 years ago is totally irrelevant to the cancellation of the agreement. There is no evidence that cancelling the agreement has improved Iranian behavior.

The fact is Donald Trump has cancelled a number executive agreements with many countries, simply because he doesn't like the agreement or they were by Obama. He promised to make new bilateral agreements but with the exception of Japan he has failed to do so. On of the major reasons is that other nations do not trust the US to live up to their agreements, in no small part do to Trump. I expect it will take Biden at least a year to undue the damage Trump has done. If the only thing he is able to do is to restore trust in US and reassert American leadership in the world, he will have done a good job.
Since all agreements by Obama sucked ,it was wise to get out of 'em. Obama is a traitor.
As Trump tried to erase every he could that Obama did, Biden will do that to Trump, and the next republican will do that to Biden, etc... and the net gain is zero and American continues down the rabbit hole.
Unless the next Repub is Trump. He CAN run again. He could declare on January 21st. That would sure keep the MEDIA busy! (hehe)
I suspect he will dance around not making it offical until the last minute. Trying to actually run a campaign for 4 years would be a huge cost and would likely lose momentum. He will most probably tweet he's going to run, thinking about running, making promises, implying a run, and generally staying in the media spotlight. That would mean he will be having rallies, making regular appearances on TV, running an ongoing battle with the administration, and giving his opinion on just about everything. But will he actually officially announce his campaign in about 3 year? I doubt anyone even Trump can answer that question. As most people are aware, Trump loves the campaigning, but doesn't really like being president. As a friend of mine who worked on the Goldwater campaign many years ago said, "One of the primary reasons an incumbent get's voted out of office is voters want a change" Trump and Biden will both be insiders, seasoned politicians with nothing new to offer.
Naw! He could start CAMPAIGNING right after the Repubs take the HOUSE in 2022. All they need is 7 seats. New Presidents usually lose 20. Biden ,being worthless ,will lose more. And you think WE will lose interest? 73 Million REAL voters want him back. Here is a bet. Biden will start another war.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top