Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 122,330
- 3,635
No, that actually was the question. Here, take a look yourself ....
Asclepias: What evidence showed TM started the confrontation? Z's word?
Katzndogz : He was acquitted. Whatever you think about evidence, it's over. You can only make it up from here.
Asclepias: Acquitted does not equal evidence. What evidence led to the acquittal or are you just assuming there must have been something.
PredFan: Are you really REALLY that stupid? Of course there was evidence that led to the acquittal.
Asclepias: Well lets have it. What was it? What was the evidence that said TM started the confrontation?
PredFan: Changed the question I see.
I took the liberty to highlight the relevant portions of that dialog.
So what's your excuse? Too stupid to follow along or do you suffer from ADD like Zimmerman?
It's always fun watching folks who celebrate like you end up being the butt of their own joke. :clap
... oh, and I'm still waiting for you to answer ....
The defense put up a witness who said Zimmerman told him he had to pry the gun from Martin. Are you saying he was lying??
Hey moron. I wasn't in the original conversation. I was responding to a particular question. One that you didn't bother to highlight. I suppose you don't have the mental capacity to follow when a discussion takes a little sidetrack. But hey, don't let me interrupt your idiotic ranting.
Hey moron next time catch up before claiming I changed the question. How stupid can you be to miss that?
That rightard didn't even need to catch up -- your question was in the very post that stared him in the face when he clicked on [ QUOTE ]



It was right in front of him and he still couldn't figure it out.




