George Zimmerman banned from Tinder dating app

[MarcATL]

Your Derangement worsens as I never challenged the testimony of the eye witnesses. Sitting on top of Zimmerman is neither proof of thuggery nor initiating the fight.

Agree to disagree.

Only a thug uses more force than reasonably necessary. TM was a thug.

.

You don't know that Trayvon beat him in the manner that you consistently claim him to have. It's not a proven fact.

Yet you run around pretending that it is.

Telling.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[MacTheKnife]

well Z called 911 because he wasnt there to start a fight,,,so by that logic if TM didnt start it he would have called 911 because he felt threatened,,,

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

You fail to grasp the power of deductive reasoning.




tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

I never said Z followed Trayvon through the neighborhood....i have though stated a very logical fact....you cannot follow someone you cannot see. George at best was 'attempting' to follow Trayvon for a little while until the dispatcher told him they did not need him to do that at which time he ceased.

When the dispatcher asked George if he was following Trayvon ...George mispoke...he just meant he was walking in the direction trayvon had run off to.

 

[MacTheKnife]

Your Derangement worsens as I never challenged the testimony of the eye witnesses. Sitting on top of Zimmerman is neither proof of thuggery nor initiating the fight.

Agree to disagree.

Only a thug uses more force than reasonably necessary. TM was a thug.

.

You don't know that Trayvon beat him in the manner that you consistently claim him to have. It's not a proven fact.

Yet you run around pretending that it is.

Telling.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You are a simpleton.....not understanding how truth is arrived at.

Perhaps like milennials you do not believe anything unless you can see it on a video. heh heh

Wise up boyo.............

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I

 

[MacTheKnife]

so youre just another troll,,,,

we already knew that,,,

LOL

Trying to get you to prove your claims means I'm a troll? Looks like you don't know what a troll is.

my opinion is based on the fact Z was found not guilty,

That only proves Zimmerman had a reasonable fear of death or great bodily injury at the moment he pulled the trigger. It offers zero insight as to who initiated the physical confrontation.

It has already been noted you lack the ability to engage in deductive reasoning ---I will ax you anyhow boyo....why on earth would Z initiate a confrontation with Trayvon? He knew the police were on the way in fact just a few short minutes away.

He could have tried to physically detain Trayvon, for all anyone knows, after expressing frustration at how "these assholes they always get away."

Still out dere in neva neval land eh....pathetic.

Again....you lack good reasoning skills....study up on deductive reasoning....might help you or it might not.....all I can do is lead a jackass to the water....I cannot force him to drink....git mah drift boyo?

 

[MacTheKnife]

well Z called 911 because he wasnt there to start a fight,,,so by that logic if TM didnt start it he would have called 911 because he felt threatened,,,

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

George Zimmerman made several neighborhood watch phone calls to police dispatchers in the months before Trayvon Martin's death.

'Donald O'Brien stressed that the homeowners association had nothing to do with the neighborhood watch program but that he did attend a meeting to start it.

He said he once text messaged Zimmerman with praises for a group of workers who followed a burglar. Their actions led to the arrest of a young black man, who was charged with burglaries in the neighborhood, O'Brien said.'

O'Brien added that police indicated it was acceptable to follow suspicious persons at a safe distance. He also said he signed an agreement with police to increase patrol of the area and to tow illegally parked cars.


Z never had a problem with suspects before and there would have been no problem with Trayvon and trayvon would be alive and with his family if had not made the decision to assault George. simple as dat boyo....

Trial turns to Zimmerman's neighborhood-watch role


next

 

[Correll]

Following a suspected criminal so that you can tell the police where to find him, while obviously risky, is not legally nor morally wrong.


I won't even call it stupid. YOu balanced the risk to himself, ie getting attacked, with the potential gain to his community, ie getting a criminal off the streets.


Hey, anyone ever hear if those robberies continued or stopped after Martin died?

He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.

1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.

I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.

1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.

Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.

Zimmerman's actions, while provocative, were not a physical attack that justifies the violence from Martin, that was witnessed.

 

[Correll]

To support the claim that Zimmerman is responsible for Martin's death, it is on you, as it was in the court, to support the claim that Zimmerman attacked Martin.

We’re talking about who initiated the physical confrontation. Please try harder to keep up.

and that was TM

Which you’ve been proven insane for asserting since you failed miserably to prove it.

Said the man that can't prove the Zimmerman initiated the physcial confrontation.

Why should I prove that when I never made any such claim?

Because unless you can show that Zimmerman initiated the fight, you desire to blame Zimmerman for the fight, fails.

 

[Correll]

Zimmerman clearly was the aggressor and IDIOT
........he is the perfect example of an idiot who should never have been armed because his idiocy CAUSED a death
..some humans are just stupid/idiots [ undeniable ] --and should not carry weapons

except the world is a better place without travon in it,,,,

..I am all for being security aware in your neighborhood/etc
...but TM was doing NOTHING wrong..nothing wrong at all
.....of all the shootings of blacks, THIS is the one that should've been protested big time

He was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's chest beating him "MMA style".

That's what happens when you stalk people. Zimmerman was told to keep his fat ass in the car

You seem to be stating that Martin felt provoked by being followed and thus almost certainly was the attacker.


I agree.

 

[Faun]

What a fucking joke, this coward wasn't protecting no damn community. He was harassing a black teenager who was walking home minding his own business talking on his cellphone, but to punk ass rightwing, racist that is heroic

Peeking in windows as he trespassed on private property. Dont these crackers understand blacks can walk where they damn well please!

LOL

I love how zimbots make up all sorts of bullshit. There's no evidence he was peeking in windows.

'We now know that George Zimmerman did not mouth the racial slurs claimed by mainstream media sources, nor did he target Martin because he was "black"; rather he found Martin's behavior - looking in windows, walking between houses - suspect in a gated community that had experienced an inordinate number of residential burglaries; and that, when asked by police dispatch for the race of the individual he was following, told them he thought Martin might be black. A long way from what the mainstream media spread across the airwaves'



Lynn Stuter -- The reality of the Trayvon Martin fiasco

NBC issues apology for edited Zimmerman 911 call

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that's not Zimmerman speaking. Zimmerman never said he observed Martin looking in windows.

 

[MarcATL]

You are a simpleton.....not understanding how truth is arrived at.

Perhaps like milennials you do not believe anything unless you can see it on a video. heh heh

Wise up boyo.............

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I

No matter what nonsense you spew, running around PRETENDING that a non-fact, is a fact, is dishonest.

And says more about your character, or lack thereof rather, than anything else.

 

[MarcATL]

Zimmerman's actions, while provocative, were not a physical attack that justifies the violence from Martin, that was witnessed.

Who witnessed it?

 

[Faun]

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

You fail to grasp the power of deductive reasoning.




tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

I never said Z followed Trayvon through the neighborhood....i have though stated a very logical fact....you cannot follow someone you cannot see. George at best was 'attempting' to follow Trayvon for a little while until the dispatcher told him they did not need him to do that at which time he ceased.

When the dispatcher asked George if he was following Trayvon ...George mispoke...he just meant he was walking in the direction trayvon had run off to.

You obviously can’t prove the shit you claim because you’re making it up from your racist imagination.

You said, ”he had gone through this type of scenario before.”

We know he was following Martin because he said he was following Martin. That’s not a “misspeak,” that’s what he was doing. Staying behind someone in their direction, even as they change direction, is following them.

So show where Zimmerman had done that before.... oh, wait, you can’t. You were lying.

All you prove is you’re a nut who has to twist his own words because your own words are bullshit.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Trying to get you to prove your claims means I'm a troll? Looks like you don't know what a troll is.

my opinion is based on the fact Z was found not guilty,

That only proves Zimmerman had a reasonable fear of death or great bodily injury at the moment he pulled the trigger. It offers zero insight as to who initiated the physical confrontation.

It has already been noted you lack the ability to engage in deductive reasoning ---I will ax you anyhow boyo....why on earth would Z initiate a confrontation with Trayvon? He knew the police were on the way in fact just a few short minutes away.

He could have tried to physically detain Trayvon, for all anyone knows, after expressing frustration at how "these assholes they always get away."

Still out dere in neva neval land eh....pathetic.

Again....you lack good reasoning skills....study up on deductive reasoning....might help you or it might not.....all I can do is lead a jackass to the water....I cannot force him to drink....git mah drift boyo?

LOLOL

Is that supposed to refute anything...?

 

[progressive hunter]

You fail to grasp the power of deductive reasoning.




tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

I never said Z followed Trayvon through the neighborhood....i have though stated a very logical fact....you cannot follow someone you cannot see. George at best was 'attempting' to follow Trayvon for a little while until the dispatcher told him they did not need him to do that at which time he ceased.

When the dispatcher asked George if he was following Trayvon ...George mispoke...he just meant he was walking in the direction trayvon had run off to.

You obviously can’t prove the shit you claim because you’re making it up from your racist imagination.

You said, ”he had gone through this type of scenario before.”

We know he was following Martin because he said he was following Martin. That’s not a “misspeak,” that’s what he was doing. Staying behind someone in their direction, even as they change direction, is following them.

So show where Zimmerman had done that before.... oh, wait, you can’t. You were lying.

All you prove is you’re a nut who has to twist his own words because your own words are bullshit.

your the only racist I've seen here

 

[Faun]

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

George Zimmerman made several neighborhood watch phone calls to police dispatchers in the months before Trayvon Martin's death.

'Donald O'Brien stressed that the homeowners association had nothing to do with the neighborhood watch program but that he did attend a meeting to start it.

He said he once text messaged Zimmerman with praises for a group of workers who followed a burglar. Their actions led to the arrest of a young black man, who was charged with burglaries in the neighborhood, O'Brien said.'

O'Brien added that police indicated it was acceptable to follow suspicious persons at a safe distance. He also said he signed an agreement with police to increase patrol of the area and to tow illegally parked cars.


Z never had a problem with suspects before and there would have been no problem with Trayvon and trayvon would be alive and with his family if had not made the decision to assault George. simple as dat boyo....

Trial turns to Zimmerman's neighborhood-watch role


next

Zimmerman was not a “group of workers.” You have no evidence Zimmerman had ever followed anyone before.

 

[Faun]

He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.

1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.

I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.

1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.

Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.

Zimmerman's actions, while provocative, were not a physical attack that justifies the violence from Martin, that was witnessed.

We’ll never know since we’ll never know who initiated the physical altercation.

 

[Faun]

We’re talking about who initiated the physical confrontation. Please try harder to keep up.

and that was TM

Which you’ve been proven insane for asserting since you failed miserably to prove it.

Said the man that can't prove the Zimmerman initiated the physcial confrontation.

Why should I prove that when I never made any such claim?

Because unless you can show that Zimmerman initiated the fight, you desire to blame Zimmerman for the fight, fails.

I never blamed him for the fight. You should try arguing with what I actually say and not what you think I mean.

 

[Faun]

Zimmerman's actions, while provocative, were not a physical attack that justifies the violence from Martin, that was witnessed.

Who witnessed it?

Exactly.

 

[MacTheKnife]

You fail to grasp the power of deductive reasoning.




tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

Ridiculous and quite childish observation....goes against George's entire history...he had gone through this type of scenario before boyo and his sop was always to observe and report to the police....which is what he did here...he only got out of his truck to try and help the dispatcher in her quest to find out where Trayvon might be and where to send the police.

Yet you and others who want to defend the indefensible (trayvon) called him a coward.....a coward would never have out of his truck in such a situation.

George had every right to get out of his truck....it was his neighborhood, he lived in the complex and he was trying to be of help to the police who he knew were on the way.

Who would call the police and then knowing they are on the way....start a fight? Ridiculous assumption on your part once again....as pointed out.....a lack of proper deductive reasoning.

SoP?? When other time did Zimmerman follow someone through the neighborhood?

I never said Z followed Trayvon through the neighborhood....i have though stated a very logical fact....you cannot follow someone you cannot see. George at best was 'attempting' to follow Trayvon for a little while until the dispatcher told him they did not need him to do that at which time he ceased.

When the dispatcher asked George if he was following Trayvon ...George mispoke...he just meant he was walking in the direction trayvon had run off to.

You obviously can’t prove the shit you claim because you’re making it up from your racist imagination.

You said, ”he had gone through this type of scenario before.”

We know he was following Martin because he said he was following Martin. That’s not a “misspeak,” that’s what he was doing. Staying behind someone in their direction, even as they change direction, is following them.

So show where Zimmerman had done that before.... oh, wait, you can’t. You were lying.

All you prove is you’re a nut who has to twist his own words because your own words are bullshit.

• Zimmerman, who was captain of the neighborhood watch and licensed to carry a gun, made 46 calls to police since 2004, according to department records.

I'n fact, the local homeowners’ association reports that George Zimmerman actually caught one thief and aided in the apprehension of other criminals. The Miami Herald wrote about this on March 17th. None of the thousands of articles and cable news segments that came after, thought this was important.'

Trayvon Martin – The Latest – Media Narrative Continues To Crumble Under The Weight Of Lies – Image of Trayvon the troubled teen worsens

 

[MacTheKnife]

1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.

I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.

1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.

Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.

Zimmerman's actions, while provocative, were not a physical attack that justifies the violence from Martin, that was witnessed.

We’ll never know since we’ll never know who initiated the physical altercation.

You do not know because you lack good analytical skills. Most of us know by the use of deductive reasoning....taking into account all the evidence, the history of Trayvon, George's history with the neighborhood watch program, Trayvon's behavior that night, his doubling back to confront George, his refusal to go home or else stay there if he really went home as his g/f testified he told her on the phone he was at home etc. etc. You either willfully ignore all that or you are trying to cover up for Trayvon.