George Will quits the Republican party

[jillian]

George Will, conservative intellect, columnist, has quit the Republican party because of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has taken the Republican party away from conservative values.

The new "Republicans" probably do not know who George Will or William F Buckley are.

The new "Republican" is an uneducated white person who has no idea about true conservatism.

Yo, George Will has been a Hack for the Democrats for some time now!!!

"GTP"
Buckley is resting in peace! National Review magazine in 1955, founder!

yes, must get the smart, thoughtful people out of the GOP so the white trash can kill the party

if you live in a trailor park then you are no longer capable of making decisions for yourself or the country...elitism.

funny... that seems to be the GOP base.

are you claiming only rich people should vote? that leaves out most of your people.

Donnie is counting on low informaton voters and that Fact Checkers take a long vacation.

that's why he loves the uneducated

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's not what she responded to. You're changing it again.

Obviously, you see no difference between conservative and Republican. Very telling.

Not really, it's actually the ability to discern context that you are lacking. Will has been attacking Republicans in ways that totally benefit Democrats for a long time. I didn't say he is a Democrat, I said he's not a Republican. And he's not consistently a conservative

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Kaz, if you keep writing stupidly, people are going to keep laughing at you.

Neo-con is an individual who is big on the projection of American power into targeted areas overseas using a combination of financial pressures, massive armed intervention, and huge government dollar outlays. They are people like Bush, Rumsfeld Cheney, Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc.

They were allied to the social cons and the corporatists.

They are using fools like you, Kaz. Trump is their man.

 

[kaz]

Yes, they supported the wars and yes they supported tax breaks.

Yes they did.

And they also blasted him repeatedly for his spending.

No they didn't. Not about war spending and not about tax breaks adding to the debt. You're a liar.

Yeah, they did. You're an idiot. You obviously don't listen to them. I do. So why are you such a stupid ***** that you think you know what they say? W is a neocon, Rush and Sean are not. Therefore, they agree with him on the military, they disagree with him on the spending. When you have no idea what you are talking about, like what Rush and Sean say, why do you need to flaunt your ignorance? All you're showing is that you do in fact make up your shit as you go. You know what Rush and Sean think and say? Yeah, what a dumb ass.

Hey speaking of Paul Ryan, remember when he let the air out of your tires and you had to walk home? Damn, he was relentless. Isn't he about four feet tall? How did he pick on you like that? No wonder you hate him so much, Skippy

 

[Wry Catcher]

That's not what she responded to. You're changing it again.

Obviously, you see no difference between conservative and Republican. Very telling.

Not really, it's actually the ability to discern context that you are lacking. Will has been attacking Republicans in ways that totally benefit Democrats for a long time. I didn't say he is a Democrat, I said he's not a Republican. And he's not consistently a conservative

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Your spin won't turn. The neo cons were the signers of the PNAC Statement of Principles, read their names at the end of this document:

http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/pfpc/PNAC---statement of principles.pdf

Some signers whose names you might recognize:

• Dick Cheney
• Jeb Bush
• Scooter Libby
• Don Rumsfeld
• Paul Wolfowitz
• Steve Forbes
• William J. Bennet

All liberals?

 

[jillian]

Not really, it's actually the ability to discern context that you are lacking. Will has been attacking Republicans in ways that totally benefit Democrats for a long time. I didn't say he is a Democrat, I said he's not a Republican. And he's not consistently a conservative

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Kaz, if you keep writing stupidly, people are going to keep laughing at you.

Neo-con is an individual who is big on the projection of American power into targeted areas overseas using a combination of financial pressures, massive armed intervention, and huge government dollar outlays. They are people like Bush, Rumsfeld Cheney, Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc.

They were allied to the social cons and the corporatists.

They are using fools like you, Kaz. Trump is their man.

obama biden and clinton are not neocons.

the desire of neocons is to "reshape the middle east". read the PNAC letter of 1998 to bill clinton if you're actually interested.

 

[kaz]

Not really, it's actually the ability to discern context that you are lacking. Will has been attacking Republicans in ways that totally benefit Democrats for a long time. I didn't say he is a Democrat, I said he's not a Republican. And he's not consistently a conservative

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Neo-con is an individual who is big on the projection of American power into targeted areas overseas using a combination of financial pressures, massive armed intervention, and huge government dollar outlays. They are people like Bush, Rumsfeld Cheney, Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc.

They were allied to the social cons and the corporatists.

They are using fools like you, Kaz. Trump is their man.

Ah, I thought you didn't know what a neocon is when in fact you made up your own definition, I stand corrected.

Neocon has nothing to do with social issues, jake. And I oppose socons, corporatists (they are a variation of socialists like you) and use of the military for non-defensive purposes, so how are the neocons you made up using me again?

 

[jillian]

I wasn't insulting you. I was commenting on you saying that Will hasn't been a Republican for a long time. That's ridiculous.

It's funny how long it was discussed and then when it happened you think it came out of the blue

Dude, there is no litmus test to be a Republican.

Republican is a party, not an ideology. You can be a liberal Republican or a conservative Republican. To be a Republican, you sign up. That's it.

Small Tent Republicans want a check-the-box litmus test, but being a member of a political party requires none of that.

Saying you are a member of the party doesn't make you one. Jake for example is clearly not a Republican. And why would he leave the party over Trump? Why not just vote for him? That he's "leaving" the party demonstrates my point

Wrong.

Anyone is a republican who says he’s a republican.

There are republicans who defend the privacy rights of women.

There are republicans who defend the right of gay Americans to marry.

There are republicans who defend the right of transgender Americans to express themselves freely.

And they do so because it’s consistent with the most fundamental of republican tenets: less government, enhanced individual liberty.

Sadly, the GOP lost that commitment to individual liberty decades ago, the consequence of the Faustian bargain struck with the social right, where the Party is now the enemy of individual liberty, having become authoritarian, reactionary, and repressive.

Gawd, liberals talking about anyone losing a "commitment to individual liberty" just stenches of hypocrisy. The IRS, Social Security and Obamacare are the greatest intruders on our personal liberty in the government, they make the NSA look like pikers

so little information at your disposal. you really should hang it up. you sound ridiculous.

 

[ElmerMudd]

George Will is not a conservative, he's a NEOCONSERVATIVE. Neocons are the idiots that invaded Iraq and destabilized the entire middle east. Neocons are the arrogant jackasses that started the "PNAC" and promised a "new American Century" of peace and prosperity but instead delivered massive budget deficits, ever expanding government, and endless wars. .

Neocons are scum that destroyed the GOP.

Good riddance George.

Almost every Democrat voted to invade Iraq, doofus.

That didn't make it any less illegal, or any less a disaster for America.

How's Obamas invasion of Syria and Libya working out?

Obama did not invade Syria even though many felt he should.
As an Obama supporter I feel our actions in Libya under him were a mistake.
But it's impact cannot be compared to Iraq.

 

[kaz]

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Kaz, if you keep writing stupidly, people are going to keep laughing at you.

Neo-con is an individual who is big on the projection of American power into targeted areas overseas using a combination of financial pressures, massive armed intervention, and huge government dollar outlays. They are people like Bush, Rumsfeld Cheney, Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc.

They were allied to the social cons and the corporatists.

They are using fools like you, Kaz. Trump is their man.

obama biden and clinton are not neocons.

the desire of neocons is to "reshape the middle east". read the PNAC letter of 1998 to bill clinton if you're actually interested.

Yes, they are all neocons, you don't know what the word means. And reshaping the middle east is exactly what the three losers you pointed to are doing as well as big government spending at home.

You people are so stupid, you think "neo" means extreme, it doesn't, it means new. You call cons neocons. Idiots.

 

[kaz]

It's funny how long it was discussed and then when it happened you think it came out of the blue

Dude, there is no litmus test to be a Republican.

Republican is a party, not an ideology. You can be a liberal Republican or a conservative Republican. To be a Republican, you sign up. That's it.

Small Tent Republicans want a check-the-box litmus test, but being a member of a political party requires none of that.

Saying you are a member of the party doesn't make you one. Jake for example is clearly not a Republican. And why would he leave the party over Trump? Why not just vote for him? That he's "leaving" the party demonstrates my point

Wrong.

Anyone is a republican who says he’s a republican.

There are republicans who defend the privacy rights of women.

There are republicans who defend the right of gay Americans to marry.

There are republicans who defend the right of transgender Americans to express themselves freely.

And they do so because it’s consistent with the most fundamental of republican tenets: less government, enhanced individual liberty.

Sadly, the GOP lost that commitment to individual liberty decades ago, the consequence of the Faustian bargain struck with the social right, where the Party is now the enemy of individual liberty, having become authoritarian, reactionary, and repressive.

Gawd, liberals talking about anyone losing a "commitment to individual liberty" just stenches of hypocrisy. The IRS, Social Security and Obamacare are the greatest intruders on our personal liberty in the government, they make the NSA look like pikers

so little information at your disposal. you really should hang it up. you sound ridiculous.

Pretty much everything above dick and jane sounds ridiculous to you, doesn't it my dear airhead?

 

[JakeStarkey]

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Kaz, if you keep writing stupidly, people are going to keep laughing at you.

Neo-con is an individual who is big on the projection of American power into targeted areas overseas using a combination of financial pressures, massive armed intervention, and huge government dollar outlays. They are people like Bush, Rumsfeld Cheney, Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc.

They were allied to the social cons and the corporatists.

They are using fools like you, Kaz. Trump is their man.

obama biden and clinton are not neocons.

the desire of neocons is to "reshape the middle east". read the PNAC letter of 1998 to bill clinton if you're actually interested.

As I told the Utah berns much to their anger that Libya and Syria so on shows that Oama and Clinton have been corrupted on this issue.

 

[kaz]

Not really, it's actually the ability to discern context that you are lacking. Will has been attacking Republicans in ways that totally benefit Democrats for a long time. I didn't say he is a Democrat, I said he's not a Republican. And he's not consistently a conservative

kaz yet again reveals inability to analyze carefully. Will has not adopted either the neo-con or the far right political newcomers and their beliefs to the GOP over the last twenty years. He believes they do not hold core GOP beliefs. He is right.

Neocons are in both parties and the last two Presidents, one from each party, were both neocons. You still don't know what it means, do you, Jake? You think neocon means far right, that isn't what it means. Neo means new, Jake. They aren't cons. They are big government liberal spenders who use the military to push policy as both W and O did up to their armpits.

Stop the deflections.

We are talking about the GOP and its big liberal spending from 2001.

Trump will spend crazily. We know HRC will, but we can't do a thing about her,

Get out of the ME, stop the nonsense about gays and marriage, work on infrastructure, get the fed out of education, and start getting our people elected for the right reasons.

Stop using the term "neocon" until you learn what it means, Jake. It does not mean extremely conservative. Someone who's a fiscal conservative and strong on the military isn't a "neocon" they are just a "con." Neocon is a "new conservative," a big government liberal who falls in love with the military to impose our will on other governments and how they operate.

W and O are neocons, Hillary is a neocon. I don't know what Trump is, I'm not sure he does either. Labels are fine if they are accurate, but stop using them wrong, you just look like you don't know what you are talking about

Your spin won't turn. The neo cons were the signers of the PNAC Statement of Principles, read their names at the end of this document:

http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/pfpc/PNAC---statement of principles.pdf

Some signers whose names you might recognize:

• Dick Cheney
• Jeb Bush
• Scooter Libby
• Don Rumsfeld
• Paul Wolfowitz
• Steve Forbes
• William J. Bennet

All liberals?

Neocon is a word with a definition, it's not just a particular document. And again, neocons are liberal spenders. I don't know enough about their fiscal policies to know if they are all personally neocons, but the ones in the Bush Administration sure supported a neocon President.

Again, absolutely, W is a neocon. That's the one you get right. But so is O while Rush is not. When you understand the word, you will know why

 

[ElmerMudd]

Yo, George Will has been a Hack for the Democrats for some time now!!!

Absolutely disgusting. Just like Trump, you are making fun of those with disabilities.

You do not get it. This is not about being politically correct, it is about being a good person and you obviously are not.

Have a child with a disability and see what you think of your disgustinfg words.

You don't understand.


Political Correctness is NOT about being political sensitive.

It is about using manufactured outrage to advance the lib agenda.

So, when someone using "retard" to attack a Trump supporter, it is OK.

Absolutely not you idiot. In calling you an idiot I apologize to all idiots that are not nearly as big of idiot as you.

Take a child with a disability and their parents and see how that word effects them. It has nothing to do with politics.

It is human decency. You do not have human decency..

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kaz does not use terms and definitions professionally.

The original neo-cons, failed liberals of post-Vietnam, moved over to the GOP in the later eighties and nineties.

When Bush won the election, they knew with great joy the country was going to war and began looking for a cause.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Yo, George Will has been a Hack for the Democrats for some time now!!!

Absolutely disgusting. Just like Trump, you are making fun of those with disabilities.

You do not get it. This is not about being politically correct, it is about being a good person and you obviously are not.

Have a child with a disability and see what you think of your disgustinfg words.

You don't understand.


Political Correctness is NOT about being political sensitive.

It is about using manufactured outrage to advance the lib agenda.

So, when someone using "retard" to attack a Trump supporter, it is OK.

We will make sure to establish Safe Zones so your feelings don't get hurt from microaggressions.

It is the feelings of a child or adult with disabilities that is no fault of their own.

You show signs of being a sociopath; someone who cannot empathize with the pain of others.
EVEN A CHILD WITH A DISABILITY.

 

[kaz]

Kaz does not use terms and definitions professionally.

The original neo-cons, failed liberals of post-Vietnam, moved over to the GOP in the later eighties and nineties.

When Bush won the election, they knew with great joy the country was going to war and began looking for a cause.

I say every time that W is a neocon, dumb ass. I also said both parties are full of neocons. How do you get out of that I'm saying only Democrats are neocons?

Obama took the traditional path of a Democrat liberal who fell in love with the military. W and Hillary seem to have just always been neocons.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kaz does not use terms and definitions professionally.

The original neo-cons, failed liberals of post-Vietnam, moved over to the GOP in the later eighties and nineties.

When Bush won the election, they knew with great joy the country was going to war and began looking for a cause.

I say every time that W is a neocon, dumb ass. I also said both parties are full of neocons. How do you get out of that I'm saying only Democrats are neocons? Obama took the traditional path of a Democrat liberal who fell in love with the military. W and Hillary seem to have just always been neocons.

I explained the term competently, which you merely misdefined. You lie if you think I said that you said only Dems are neo-cons. I am correcting your lack of knowledge as well as the mediocre application of it.

Hint: stopped filtering through the ideology of woo woo liberarianism and you might make more sense,

 

[paulitician]

Time for all the old fart establishment frauds to get the boot. George Will can never be trusted. He's a member of the old One-Party Elite Club. So good riddance.

 

[paulitician]

George Will is not a conservative, he's a NEOCONSERVATIVE. Neocons are the idiots that invaded Iraq and destabilized the entire middle east. Neocons are the arrogant jackasses that started the "PNAC" and promised a "new American Century" of peace and prosperity but instead delivered massive budget deficits, ever expanding government, and endless wars. .

Neocons are scum that destroyed the GOP.

Good riddance George.

Nuff said.

 

[JakeStarkey]

George Will, with Dick Armey and other good cons, did not support the invasion of Iraq.

Dumbum Zanderum misspoke yet again.