CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Banned
- #161
True.. and when that is pointed out I stand against those earmarks too...
Funny.. the GI Bill bill could have simply stood alone and easily passed with bipartisan support... but the lefties decided to include things that they knew would otherwise never pass... which then put many like myself in opposition of the bill
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops...those earmarks
![]()
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops...
You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em!
When you make this sort of stupidly pathetic and offensive statement, all you demonstrate is that there is no depth to which you will not sink to point score.
It is rare that I resort to actually considering anyone on a forum pondscum - I genuinely believe you are the first. I guess I should congratulate you on being more offensive than total assclowns like Huggy and Gaybiker.
Oh please. The far right does support war over the Troops and that camp has always tried to equate Policy to our Troops by saying anyone who doesn't support our occupations in iraq and afghanistan don't support our Troops. Another glaring piece is keeping our Troops in needless wars. If your camp cared even one millimeter for our Troops you would never support optional wars that force them to die and lose limbs for no viable reason.



