General Flynn Wasn’t The Only One

See post #50......and weep.
Need a tissue, you lying sack of shit?

After over 33 years of military service to our country, including nearly five years in combat away from my family, and then my decision to continue to serve the United States, it has been extraordinarily painful to endure these many months of false accusations of "treason" and other outrageous acts. Such false accusations are contrary to everything I have ever done and stood for. But I recognize that the actions I acknowledged in court today were wrong, and, through my faith in God, I am working to set things right. My guilty plea and agreement to cooperate with the Special Counsel's Office reflect a decision I made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility for my actions.

December 1, 2017

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

At least he did accept responsibility. Until he realized more deceit would likely get him a pardon from Individual 1.
 
"What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute," the notes reveal.” Unsealed Notes Reveal FBI Planned Perjury Trap For Flynn
Of course he could have avoided the trap by telling the TRUTH. What an absurd idea.
He did tell the truth.

So said the original FBI investigators, you dope.
So he told the truth and was then prosecuted for perjury, which he then admitted to? I understand your association with truth is rare but how is that possible?
If you didn't have your head shoved so far up your ass you'd know. As it is you have to have your handlers send you telegrams of what you're supposed to think and say and then you need a flashlight to read them.View attachment 331812
Didn't you mean to post this in the Conspiracy Theory room?
No I responed to the OP where it was, dumbass and it was posted here.
How many hours out of every day do you practice being stupid? I must say you're pretty good at it.


Pretty good???????


He's perfected it!
I thought the juvenile insults were your job Politchic? I have to admit, when it comes to juvenile insults, you're the master.
 
They threatened his son if he didn't cop.

Win at any cost.....the motto of your side.

And since the aim of the Left is to destroy the concept of family, you won't understand Flynn's motivation.
They offered to let Flynn's son off the hook for his son's part in the conspiracy if papa would own up to what he did.

Is this the Right's view of family values?


What law did he break and what statements of his prove that?
You're welcome to Google the details but, as I recall, he met with some Russians and, when asked about it by the Feds, as part of a collusion investigation, he denied it. The Feds had a smoking gun so when they gave him a chance to admit it under oath, he chose to commit perjury instead and they had him.

"He became a senior advisor to Trump during his presidential campaign and served as the National Security Advisor ... "
Wikipedia.

What is the job of "the National Security Advisor ... "?
You're going to tell me it includes lying to the FBI? If Flynn did nothing wrong why didn't he say what he'd done? Why lie if you have nothing to hide?


Your side threatened his family.

You know what 'family' is???


The Left's aim is to destroy the concept of family.
 
WTF is taking Barr and Durham so long? The indictments should have been issued by now for the obvious crimes.
The defense attorneys can delay and delay so that the deep state criminals escape justice.
"Obvious crimes", eh? Name them.
It's going to take awhile. We're still waiting for them to lock up Hillary and it's been over 3 years. Has anybody got an update?
 
See post #50......and weep.
Need a tissue, you lying sack of shit?

After over 33 years of military service to our country, including nearly five years in combat away from my family, and then my decision to continue to serve the United States, it has been extraordinarily painful to endure these many months of false accusations of "treason" and other outrageous acts. Such false accusations are contrary to everything I have ever done and stood for. But I recognize that the actions I acknowledged in court today were wrong, and, through my faith in God, I am working to set things right. My guilty plea and agreement to cooperate with the Special Counsel's Office reflect a decision I made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility for my actions.

December 1, 2017

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

At least he did accept responsibility. Until he realized more deceit would likely get him a pardon from Individual 1.



Forcing the Lefts droned to vulgarity is one of my gifts.

And I'll force you to do so again!!



"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius

 
They threatened his son if he didn't cop.

Win at any cost.....the motto of your side.

And since the aim of the Left is to destroy the concept of family, you won't understand Flynn's motivation.
They offered to let Flynn's son off the hook for his son's part in the conspiracy if papa would own up to what he did.

Is this the Right's view of family values?


What law did he break and what statements of his prove that?
You're welcome to Google the details but, as I recall, he met with some Russians and, when asked about it by the Feds, as part of a collusion investigation, he denied it. The Feds had a smoking gun so when they gave him a chance to admit it under oath, he chose to commit perjury instead and they had him.

"He became a senior advisor to Trump during his presidential campaign and served as the National Security Advisor ... "
Wikipedia.

What is the job of "the National Security Advisor ... "?
You're going to tell me it includes lying to the FBI? If Flynn did nothing wrong why didn't he say what he'd done? Why lie if you have nothing to hide?


Your side threatened his family.

You know what 'family' is???


The Left's aim is to destroy the concept of family.
I guess your concept of family comes from the Godfather movies.
 
WTF is taking Barr and Durham so long? The indictments should have been issued by now for the obvious crimes.
The defense attorneys can delay and delay so that the deep state criminals escape justice.
"Obvious crimes", eh? Name them.



Always amusing when these Leftists demand one prove that water is wet.
 
They threatened his son if he didn't cop.

Win at any cost.....the motto of your side.

And since the aim of the Left is to destroy the concept of family, you won't understand Flynn's motivation.
They offered to let Flynn's son off the hook for his son's part in the conspiracy if papa would own up to what he did.

Is this the Right's view of family values?


What law did he break and what statements of his prove that?
You're welcome to Google the details but, as I recall, he met with some Russians and, when asked about it by the Feds, as part of a collusion investigation, he denied it. The Feds had a smoking gun so when they gave him a chance to admit it under oath, he chose to commit perjury instead and they had him.

"He became a senior advisor to Trump during his presidential campaign and served as the National Security Advisor ... "
Wikipedia.

What is the job of "the National Security Advisor ... "?
You're going to tell me it includes lying to the FBI? If Flynn did nothing wrong why didn't he say what he'd done? Why lie if you have nothing to hide?


Your side threatened his family.

You know what 'family' is???


The Left's aim is to destroy the concept of family.
I guess your concept of family comes from the Godfather movies.


I guess yours comes from the Mansons.
 
They threatened his son if he didn't cop.

Win at any cost.....the motto of your side.

And since the aim of the Left is to destroy the concept of family, you won't understand Flynn's motivation.
They offered to let Flynn's son off the hook for his son's part in the conspiracy if papa would own up to what he did.

Is this the Right's view of family values?


What law did he break and what statements of his prove that?
You're welcome to Google the details but, as I recall, he met with some Russians and, when asked about it by the Feds, as part of a collusion investigation, he denied it. The Feds had a smoking gun so when they gave him a chance to admit it under oath, he chose to commit perjury instead and they had him.
well see, that's where it gets grey area. The point of the questioning was if he met russians for a meeting. he didn't. He met a russian out at a dinner or something with others. And the point of questioning was about a meeting. but fk, you just hate him because he worked for trump so facts aren't important to you. BTW, nor was he under oath.
I guess no one would ever discuss business at a dinner, especially since these Russians were, I presume, childhood friends of Flynn so a diner would be a purely person event.

I don't know about the oath stuff but I'm pretty sure you don't lie to the FBI either way since that would obstruct their investigation
he was told it wasn't a formal discussion, no need for an attorney. Doesn't matter, the question was whether or not he set up to meet with russians and he hadn't met with any. They didn't ask him have you had dinner with any.
 
WTF is taking Barr and Durham so long? The indictments should have been issued by now for the obvious crimes.
The defense attorneys can delay and delay so that the deep state criminals escape justice.
As Trey Gowdy said yesterday, there will be no indictments.
Its because senate intelligence confirmed: Russia helped Trump.


What a stupid thing to say.....

Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
 
ah damn it PC, you're making too much sense yet again. these people don't care about the truth or facts.
As I see it, you're making a hero out of a liar. Seems to be a pattern with 'you' people.
what did he lie about? you have no idea. Again, are you saying no one ever was coerced into saying they were guilty of something?
 
Brady defends Flynn!!!

"Who was Brady, anyhow? We ask because of the incredible evidence “suggesting,” as the Wall Street Journal puts it, that the FBI withheld exculpatory information from General Michael Flynn when President Trump’s first national security adviser was being maneuvered into the guilty plea that he is now trying to withdraw. The obligation of prosecutors to disclose exculpatory material is called the “Brady Rule.” Hence our question.


It turns out that John Leo Brady was a 25-year-old murderer from Maryland. He entered the pantheon of precedent because of a Supreme Court case called Brady v. Maryland, decided in 1963. Brady and a 24-year-old companion were convicted of murdering a man they knew, William Brooks. The prosecution withheld from Brady’s defense that his companion had not only admitted doing the killing but also that he’d done it alone.

The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Justice William O. Douglas, decided that Brady’s due process right had been violated. It gave him a new sentencing hearing, which spared him the death sentence he was originally given and jailed him for life. Brady eventually was paroled. The precedent, though, has been in use since and the rule has even, in some jurisdictions (including New York) been tightened.



The thing that gets us here is the failure of the liberal press. It has long loved the Brady Rule. The New York Times has been particularly eloquent when it comes to Brady violations by, say, prosecutors in New Orleans. On the 50th anniversary of Brady, the Times backed “open files reform,” under which prosecutors’ files would be generally opened. Yet Brady abuses in the Flynn case have found the liberal papers loath to speak up for their own principles in the Trump era.” The Flynn Case: Liberal Press Fails To Speak Up for Its Own Principles
 
WTF is taking Barr and Durham so long? The indictments should have been issued by now for the obvious crimes.
The defense attorneys can delay and delay so that the deep state criminals escape justice.


It is taking so long because the conspiracy is vast and stretches the globe.....Italy, Russia, Australia, Britain, are all involved.......so digging it out with anti-Trump burueacrats trying to hide what they did is not easy.........
 
...or, the practical application of evil.


1.As a child, and I don’t believe that I was alone in this, I believed in people being honest. And ‘honest,’ meaning telling the truth even when it weighed against their own interests.
Early on, reality, and experience, was like an inoculation: painful, but necessary. This was the lesson one learns: there are great swaths of individuals for whom their own interests are supreme. No matter the damage, the pain, they cause.

It is summed up in this cavalier adage of the Left: “One has to break some eggs to make an omelet.”
The 20th century resulted in over 100 million ‘eggs’ being broken,….and those deaths met with a shrug on the Left.



2. We’ve learned that the Left is still at it….and General Flynn is but one of their victims.

“The Department of Justice has released new documents relating to the FBI's so-called case against former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Handwritten FBI notes reveal the FBI's strategy ahead of their Jan. 24, 2017 interview with Flynn. The notes, reportedly belonging to Jim Baker, reveal the FBI was planning a perjury trap for the retired three-star general as part of their investigation into the now-debunked allegation that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
"What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute," the notes reveal.” Unsealed Notes Reveal FBI Planned Perjury Trap For Flynn



3. No lie, plot, ploy, scheme is too indecent for these savages. Ruin an American hero, bankrupt him, threaten his family…..all for the cause. But this sort of evil is not reserved for Flynn, or Trump. It is for anyone who opposes them or their interests. I bet few know of the same sort of attack on Trevor FitzGibbon.
The following cautionary tale is how certain Democrats destroyed Fitzgibbon, and who perpetrated it……and listen for the echo of what is happening to Biden.



4. Fitzgibbon, a longtime Democrat/Liberal/Progressive, wrote this: “I have spent the majority of my adult life working to oppose war, genocide, and supporting courageous whistleblowers. In 2002 I left my job as an environmental organizer to help lead the national PR effort to push back against the Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq. In 2007 I worked with active-duty American soldiers who called for a withdrawal of troops in Iraq — an effort featured on 60 Minutes.

My clients included Julian Assange’s Legal Defense Fund, PR support for Edward Snowden’s initial disclosures, and the governments of Venezuela and Ecuador (before they sold out JA).”
A lesson in “The Smear” | Sharyl Attkisson


5. Leading to this…
“WASHINGTON — A trove of Hillary Clinton’s emails released by the State Department on Monday …. one email after rejecting concerns from an inspector general that it contained classified information….That email, released along with 7,800 pages of messages that Mrs. Clinton sent and received when she was secretary of state, was an exchange between P. J. Crowley, at the time a State Department spokesman, and Scott Shane, a reporter for The New York Times, concerning decisions the newspaper had made about publishing information from government documents it had obtained from WikiLeaks.”
Clinton Email Is Released After Security Concern Is Dismissed



What happens to someone whose livelihood happens to impinge on the Clintons?

Next.

No US federal court has ever accepted a motion to dismiss because of claimed perjury trap.

Is that simple for you... If you lie, it is your fault... Flynn was asked a question, he lied in the answer, the FBI figured he would lie, because not lying would make him guilty of another crime.


This is how Police have been operating for years... The problem with the Trumpsters support for Flynn release is that the case is full with redactions. But I have said if they want to unredact the whole court case and evidence I would be willing to look at letting Flynn walk. FBI was willing, it was the judge who saw the whole case that stopped it...
 

Forum List

Back
Top