Abishai100
VIP Member
- Sep 22, 2013
- 4,967
- 252
- 85
Assessment of the views on female leadership throughout world history (e.g., Cleopatra, Queen Elizabeth, Joan of Arc, Margaret Thatcher, Benazir Bhutto, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, etc.) helps us determine social perspectives on gender pyramids.
I remember working as a male assistant for a feminist college journal at Dartmouth College and how the paper focused on the concerns of women in society and gender rights. We would talk about subjects/people as varied as dowry-bride burnings in India, Mother Teresa, and female eco-terrorists. From this experience, I gained some insights into the communicability of gender intellectualism.
Americans care about such things, since America is a democratic nation built by peoples from all cultural backgrounds.
How do we use history lessons to talk about relevant controversial pedestals such as 'gender-catalysed leadership corruption' (e.g., Anita Hill)? Have we blamed women for seeking power shifts?
We should plot a graph marking public approval of governments during female administrations/reigns.
Margaret Thatcher's Contested Legacy in Wales (BBC)
I remember working as a male assistant for a feminist college journal at Dartmouth College and how the paper focused on the concerns of women in society and gender rights. We would talk about subjects/people as varied as dowry-bride burnings in India, Mother Teresa, and female eco-terrorists. From this experience, I gained some insights into the communicability of gender intellectualism.
Americans care about such things, since America is a democratic nation built by peoples from all cultural backgrounds.
How do we use history lessons to talk about relevant controversial pedestals such as 'gender-catalysed leadership corruption' (e.g., Anita Hill)? Have we blamed women for seeking power shifts?
We should plot a graph marking public approval of governments during female administrations/reigns.
Margaret Thatcher's Contested Legacy in Wales (BBC)
