Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, that happens. But for very specific, time-honored, and sound reasons, marriage is a recognition given to a very narrow set of realationships.
Besides even if the country outright banned gay marriages across the board that wouldn't stop 2 women from living together as wife and wife if thats what they wanted, thats already going on with people who marry multiple partners, as long as you only have 1 marriage certificate you can shack up with as many people as you want, polygamists and Muslims do this here.
Sure, that happens. But for very specific, time-honored, and sound reasons, marriage is a recognition given to a very narrow set of realationships.
No, an ever broadening set of relationships. We used to legally prevent interracial marriage for the same reason you give to prevent me from legally marrying my non familial, consenting adult partner.
Funny... After 3 Decades, the HIV Rate isn't.
95% of the Population just can't seem to Dominate the Rate for the Disease in the First World where Homosexuals are the Most Educated and Wealthiest of the "Minorities".
Why is that?
peace...
I am a heterosexual man. Were I to fall in love with another woman, I could not marry her. Because I am married. Were I to want to marry my sister-either due to an incestuous desire or for other, well-meaning reasons, I could not do so. Were i to want to marry my best friend Bob, I could not do so. Love and attractions are personal preferences in choosing a marital partner. They have nothing to do with legal requirements.
If you wish to advocate for bigamy or incest, nobody is stopping you. The law would also have to supply a valid legal reason for preventing your marriage. They would have to provide an overriding harm in allowing them.
An argument can surely be made to prevent incest. Bigamy, not so much.
I respect your honesty, Seawytch. I however, am not a marriage advocate, except for my own.
Sure, that happens. But for very specific, time-honored, and sound reasons, marriage is a recognition given to a very narrow set of realationships.
And yet you have not given a single sound reason for banning gay marriage.
Hmmmm...
Instead, you use the conjurer's trick of misdirection and bring up all kinds of other relationships that have nothing to do with gay marriage. But we can all see what you are doing. What a pathetic failure. Don't quit your day job.
Sure, that happens. But for very specific, time-honored, and sound reasons, marriage is a recognition given to a very narrow set of realationships.
And yet you have not given a single sound reason for banning gay marriage.
Hmmmm...
Instead, you use the conjurer's trick of misdirection and bring up all kinds of other relationships that have nothing to do with gay marriage. But we can all see what you are doing. What a pathetic failure. Don't quit your day job.
You seem to assume that I take issue with the marriag of poofters. Why is that?
I have never stated that one type of relationship has anything to do with any other.
but what legal argument in favor of gay marriage does not also apply to other rrelationships that do not currently receive the legal benefits of marriage? What gives gay relationships more of a legal basis for marriage than an incestuous one, or a bigamous, or a polygamous one? What is your basis for conferring marital rights on any relationship at all?
As with most overly-emotional types, you have a tremendous capacity for passion. But try using your reason and logic a bit more.
If you wish to advocate for bigamy or incest, nobody is stopping you. The law would also have to supply a valid legal reason for preventing your marriage. They would have to provide an overriding harm in allowing them.
An argument can surely be made to prevent incest. Bigamy, not so much.
I respect your honesty, Seawytch. I however, am not a marriage advocate, except for my own.
Gee, me too...imagine that. Of course I want ALL couples like me to be able to LEGALLY marry the consenting adult of their choice.
And yet you have not given a single sound reason for banning gay marriage.
Hmmmm...
Instead, you use the conjurer's trick of misdirection and bring up all kinds of other relationships that have nothing to do with gay marriage. But we can all see what you are doing. What a pathetic failure. Don't quit your day job.
You seem to assume that I take issue with the marriag of poofters. Why is that?
I have never stated that one type of relationship has anything to do with any other.
but what legal argument in favor of gay marriage does not also apply to other rrelationships that do not currently receive the legal benefits of marriage? What gives gay relationships more of a legal basis for marriage than an incestuous one, or a bigamous, or a polygamous one? What is your basis for conferring marital rights on any relationship at all?
As with most overly-emotional types, you have a tremendous capacity for passion. But try using your reason and logic a bit more.
I have explained why many times over. So I guess you need tiny words.
Gay marriage = harmless
Incest = harmful
Get it?
Your sick attempts to place gay marriage on the same level as incest are transparent as vodka, pal.
I respect your honesty, Seawytch. I however, am not a marriage advocate, except for my own.
Gee, me too...imagine that. Of course I want ALL couples like me to be able to LEGALLY marry the consenting adult of their choice.
Just a tester....does that also apply to incestuous relationships?
You seem to assume that I take issue with the marriag of poofters. Why is that?
I have never stated that one type of relationship has anything to do with any other.
but what legal argument in favor of gay marriage does not also apply to other rrelationships that do not currently receive the legal benefits of marriage? What gives gay relationships more of a legal basis for marriage than an incestuous one, or a bigamous, or a polygamous one? What is your basis for conferring marital rights on any relationship at all?
As with most overly-emotional types, you have a tremendous capacity for passion. But try using your reason and logic a bit more.
I have explained why many times over. So I guess you need tiny words.
Gay marriage = harmless
Incest = harmful
Get it?
Your sick attempts to place gay marriage on the same level as incest are transparent as vodka, pal.
I have not equated gay marriage and incestuous except for examining how the legal basis for one applies to the legal basis for another. Have ye the vapors?
How is an incestuous relationship harmful? What if it is an incestuous relationship between octegenarians? How would that be harmful? Why does the prospect of two 80 year old brothers filing a joint tax return terrify you so?
You claim to be a genius, but I have not seen it. But if you are, please give a rational reason to ban gay marriage. Now.
Perhaps you can point specifically, or even generally, to my claim to genius status.....
And while you are at it, can you please formulate an explanation as to why you think I even believe there is a rational basis for banning poofter marriage? Now.
Gee, me too...imagine that. Of course I want ALL couples like me to be able to LEGALLY marry the consenting adult of their choice.
Just a tester....does that also apply to incestuous relationships?
You really can't stop yourself, can you. You just keep throwing out those red herrings. Obvious homophobe is obvious.
It is obvious you cannot come up with a rational reason to ban gay marriage. So like some really bizarre broken record, you talk about other kinds of relationships that have nothing to do with the matter at hand.
Just a tester....does that also apply to incestuous relationships?
You really can't stop yourself, can you. You just keep throwing out those red herrings. Obvious homophobe is obvious.
It is obvious you cannot come up with a rational reason to ban gay marriage. So like some really bizarre broken record, you talk about other kinds of relationships that have nothing to do with the matter at hand.
Can you come up with a rational reason to ban two 80 year old brothers from marrying?
Why do you hate 80 year old brothers so?
For all you know, I myself am a poofter that advocates for homo marriage and I am trying to get my like minded friends on more of a solid basis for our position than "but we love each other and we are consenting adults".
Funny... After 3 Decades, the HIV Rate isn't.
95% of the Population just can't seem to Dominate the Rate for the Disease in the First World where Homosexuals are the Most Educated and Wealthiest of the "Minorities".
Why is that?
peace...
Wow! Look how fast those goalposts moved!
You are so predictable, I made a list for you: Please see Number 4.
I have explained why many times over. So I guess you need tiny words.
Gay marriage = harmless
Incest = harmful
Get it?
Your sick attempts to place gay marriage on the same level as incest are transparent as vodka, pal.
I have not equated gay marriage and incestuous except for examining how the legal basis for one applies to the legal basis for another. Have ye the vapors?
How is an incestuous relationship harmful? What if it is an incestuous relationship between octegenarians? How would that be harmful? Why does the prospect of two 80 year old brothers filing a joint tax return terrify you so?
Please provide a rational reason for banning gay marraige. Now.
Funny... After 3 Decades, the HIV Rate isn't.
95% of the Population just can't seem to Dominate the Rate for the Disease in the First World where Homosexuals are the Most Educated and Wealthiest of the "Minorities".
Why is that?
peace...
Wow! Look how fast those goalposts moved!
You are so predictable, I made a list for you: Please see Number 4.
Where were the Goalposts at when I first placed them?...
peace...
