Gary Johnson makes the GOP nervous..

[sitarro]

You people are assholes, you actually are Bush supporters without the balls to own up to it....... Ralph Nader is a childish asshole for leading you there. You get that prick Bush in there and he appoints a couple of Supremes like the idiots he already has and you can definitely kiss this country goodbye, but you will be able to sleep at night.......**** OFF!!!

Hey Konradv, you show the creativity of the ****** you glorify.....

 

[P@triot]

What I love about these radicals is how they keep threatening to vote for Gerry Johnson.

First of all, if you had any intention of voting for him, you wouldn't feel the need to use it as a threat. You know these assholes are all going to vote for Romney.

Second, I dare these radical assholes to vote for GJ or Obama. The truth is, all of us can live under Obama exponentially better than these Sovereign Citizen libertarian idiots. We don't have a problem with authority like these numb nuts do.

Third, they've actually admitted that since Ron Paul didn't win, they want Obama to win and collapse the nation so it can be (and I quote) "rebuilt libertarian". As if there is ANY scenario where the country gets rebuilt under Sovereign Citizen anarchy. If the nation does collapse, we either return to constitutional conservatism (ie pre-1900's communism/socialism/marxism) or we end up full-fledged Nazi state. Either way, the least amount of people in this country are the Sovereign Citizen libertarian assholes.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

What I love about these radicals is how they keep threatening to vote for Gerry Johnson.

First of all, if you had any intention of voting for him, you wouldn't feel the need to use it as a threat. You know these assholes are all going to vote for Romney.

Second, I dare these radical assholes to vote for GJ or Obama. The truth is, all of us can live under Obama exponentially better than these Sovereign Citizen libertarian idiots. We don't have a problem with authority like these numb nuts do.

Third, they've actually admitted that since Ron Paul didn't win, they want Obama to win and collapse the nation so it can be (and I quote) "rebuilt libertarian". As if there is ANY scenario where the country gets rebuilt under Sovereign Citizen anarchy. If the nation does collapse, we either return to constitutional conservatism (ie pre-1900's communism/socialism/marxism) or we end up full-fledged Nazi state. Either way, the least amount of people in this country are the Sovereign Citizen libertarian assholes.

Do you double-dog dare us?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I didn't vote for Romney but it did occur to me that you guys are the ones that look foolish. BIG TIME

Your candidate ran and got ass raped BY THE VOTERS so now he has to ditch the party like a ***** and somehow the winner (Romney) is a bad choice.

News flash numbskulls HE WAS THE CHOICE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and YOUR CANDIDATE FAIL MISERABLY SHORT

You really are missing the point utterly. I'm well aware my values aren't dominant. I'm well aware Johnson won't win. But he's the only candidate who comes close to representing my views. Why would I vote for someone else?

If the U.S. falls off a fiscal cliff, will your values help sustain you through tough times?

No, but it will be of some comfort to us to be able to say "I told you so" to the people who continually vote in big government Democrats and Republicans.

 

[aaronleland]

Anybody who might (theoretically) siphon enough votes to give the incumbent a shot in a close State frightens me.

You realize, Gary has NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER of winning ANYTHING.

But if he has even the slightest chance of playing "spoiler" it goes in the wrong ******* direction.

You assholes who keep pulling for the predetermined fail known as Gary Johnson might as well suck off the President. You are disgusting. At least liberal Democrats actually like the guy.

"Wahhhhh! The conservative is going to ruin our liberal Republican's chances of winning the election."

I love how you blame the voter and pin no responsibility on your candidate when somebody doesn't want to vote for him. Why do you hate democracy?

Pick a better candidate next time and quit your whining.

Talk about "Wahhhhh!" - you little Ron Paul bitches haven't stopped crying since he was sent home with his tail between his legs.

Furthermore, you idiot assholes support a candidate who wants to get rid of the entire US military and who blames America for September 11, 2001! And you wonder why he was sent home? The man humiliated himself and his idiot supporters on national television.

I'll grant you that John McCain was a ******* horrible choice in 2008. But Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are a phenomenal choice, and only you Ron Paul assholes don't think so.

Vote for Gary Johnson - I dare you. Better yet, vote for Barack Obama. Either way, you lose just like the dementia patient Ron Paul did...

Ron Paul never said he wanted to get rid of the US military or blamed America for 9/11. Nice strawman, but try harder next time.

Talk about dementia. As i said before, you people only support democracy when it works in your favor. You want to spread democracy to other countries, but hate it when these countries elect people like the Muslim Brotherhood. Then you disagree with people like Ron Paul who argue that we should stop wasting money and American lives trying to spread democracy to other countries, while at the same time claiming to love our troops and being fiscally conservative.

About your claim that Ron Paul blamed America for 9/11, he actually blamed the American government's foreign policy for people in the Middle East hating us. Spreading democracy to another country that in turn elects people like the Muslim Brotherhood.... that's called blowback.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

If the U.S. falls off a fiscal cliff, will your values help sustain you through tough times?

Yes...

But electing people like Bush/Obama/Mitt who keep spending this country into oblivion won't help anyone no matter what their values are. Maybe you can tell us all how Mitt's plans to add 20% more to the deficit, not have any plan to pay for it is a good thing for that "fiscal cliff" your pretending to care about.

Nonsense post.

As is typical with GJ supporters, they seem to live in their own world where they believe they're immune to real life repercussions. Voting your conscience means jack shit, because your conscience is worth jack shit. If we have 10% unemployment and our currency isn't worth a grain of sand, what good is your conscience then?

Your entire reason for voting for Johnson is based on a false premise. You refuse to vote for Romney because you assume he will act no differently than Obama if elected but are voting for Johnson because you believe he will act differently? What are you basing this assumption off of other than your own fantasies? Because POTUS is nothing like being governor. GJ isjust giving you fools lip service. Let's just assume by some ridiculous chance GJ won the election; he would not do 99% of the stuff he wants to do as (1) he would be hamstrung by Congress and (2) he would cause an immediate shutdown of the U.S. government by vetoing half the stuff that comes out of Congress. Everyone knows this. So all you're doing is eating up a bunch of lies while putting forth some lame ass excuse as to why you're voting for Johnson.

If Johnson were to get elected, and all he did were the things you listed there I'd call him the best President in the history of the country.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Gary Johnson makes the GOP nervous - The Maddow Blog

Good..they won't admit it but their actions speak louder than words.

Way to be on it Agent Triple O-Seven. Good auditing.

 

[sitarro]

You really are missing the point utterly. I'm well aware my values aren't dominant. I'm well aware Johnson won't win. But he's the only candidate who comes close to representing my views. Why would I vote for someone else?

If the U.S. falls off a fiscal cliff, will your values help sustain you through tough times?

No, but it will be of some comfort to us to be able to say "I told you so" to the people who continually vote in big government Democrats and Republicans.

Wow, and that and 50 bucks will get you a gallon of gas.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

If the U.S. falls off a fiscal cliff, will your values help sustain you through tough times?

No, but it will be of some comfort to us to be able to say "I told you so" to the people who continually vote in big government Democrats and Republicans.

Wow, and that and 50 bucks will get you a gallon of gas.

Well, it's going to happen regardless of whether Romney or Obama is elected, so one might as well hold on to their principles to keep them warm in the coming nights.

 

[Shelzin]

Anybody who might (theoretically) siphon enough votes to give the incumbent a shot in a close State frightens me.

You realize, Gary has NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER of winning ANYTHING.

But if he has even the slightest chance of playing "spoiler" it goes in the wrong ******* direction.

You assholes who keep pulling for the predetermined fail known as Gary Johnson might as well suck off the President. You are disgusting. At least liberal Democrats actually like the guy.

That's an excellent way to get people to come around to your view. Good job.

Is it any wonder why the party is so fractured?

 

[Avatar4321]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

 

[Shelzin]

If the U.S. falls off a fiscal cliff, will your values help sustain you through tough times?

Yes...

But electing people like Bush/Obama/Mitt who keep spending this country into oblivion won't help anyone no matter what their values are. Maybe you can tell us all how Mitt's plans to add 20% more to the deficit, not have any plan to pay for it is a good thing for that "fiscal cliff" your pretending to care about.

Nonsense post.

As is typical with GJ supporters, they seem to live in their own world where they believe they're immune to real life repercussions. Voting your conscience means jack shit, because your conscience is worth jack shit. If we have 10% unemployment and our currency isn't worth a grain of sand, what good is your conscience then?

Eh... Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are really the only two jumping up and down and screaming about making a sound dollar.

Your entire reason for voting for Johnson is based on a false premise. You refuse to vote for Romney because you assume he will act no differently than Obama if elected but are voting for Johnson because you believe he will act differently? What are you basing this assumption off of other than your own fantasies? Because POTUS is nothing like being governor.

Uhhh.... That's Willard's experience. o.0

GJ isjust giving you fools lip service. Let's just assume by some ridiculous chance GJ won the election; he would not do 99% of the stuff he wants to do as (1) he would be hamstrung by Congress and (2) he would cause an immediate shutdown of the U.S. government by vetoing half the stuff that comes out of Congress. Everyone knows this.

PERFECT! Gary Johnson for PRESIDENT!!!

 

[Shelzin]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Now that's a good way to get people to come around to your point of view. Still might not work... But it's a whole lot better.

 

[Avatar4321]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Now that's a good way to get people to come around to your point of view. Still might not work... But it's a whole lot better.

If that doesnt work i think ill try calling you a doo doo head

 

[Shelzin]

What I love about these radicals is how they keep threatening to vote for Gerry Johnson.

A threat? The only way it would be a threat is if you cared if I voted for him or not.

First of all, if you had any intention of voting for him, you wouldn't feel the need to use it as a threat. You know these assholes are all going to vote for Romney.

It's not a threat.

Second, I dare these radical assholes to vote for GJ or Obama. The truth is, all of us can live under Obama exponentially better than these Sovereign Citizen libertarian idiots. We don't have a problem with authority like these numb nuts do.

Actually... I think it would be really good to get a president in there, and then have the opposite party controlling the houses. Less damage that way.

Third, they've actually admitted that since Ron Paul didn't win, they want Obama to win and collapse the nation so it can be (and I quote) "rebuilt libertarian". As if there is ANY scenario where the country gets rebuilt under Sovereign Citizen anarchy. If the nation does collapse, we either return to constitutional conservatism (ie pre-1900's communism/socialism/marxism) or we end up full-fledged Nazi state. Either way, the least amount of people in this country are the Sovereign Citizen libertarian assholes.

No... I really want Ron or Gary to win. I'll be voting for Gary though.

 

[Shelzin]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Now that's a good way to get people to come around to your point of view. Still might not work... But it's a whole lot better.

If that doesnt work i think ill try calling you a doo doo head

Poo Poo!!! LOL

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Assuming Romney wins, of course, in four years the line will be "But you have to support Romney or the Democrat will win!" It won't matter how bad Romney is in office, the goal will only be to defeat the Democrats.

 

[Avatar4321]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Assuming Romney wins, of course, in four years the line will be "But you have to support Romney or the Democrat will win!" It won't matter how bad Romney is in office, the goal will only be to defeat the Democrats.

He will win. And yes there will probably be some idiots saying that.

But after four years, you'll probably be supporting him by then. I could be wrong. But thats the beauty of the future. You don't always know.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Seriously people, you guys are all making this far more personal than it needs to be. We can disagree without being @$$&%*s to one another.

I don't see how you guys seriously think that a man who couldn't get support in the Republican primary is going to start syphoning Republican votes in the General. He'll either pick up people who aren't going to vote for either Romney or Obama or he will attract people who arent going to vote Obama who are young and still think third parties have a shot.

You guys are free to do that. In fact, I encourage you to. You need to vote your conscience. I'll vote mine. And if four years we can readdress whether the Romney administration was an improvement or not.

Assuming Romney wins, of course, in four years the line will be "But you have to support Romney or the Democrat will win!" It won't matter how bad Romney is in office, the goal will only be to defeat the Democrats.

He will win. And yes there will probably be some idiots saying that.

But after four years, you'll probably be supporting him by then. I could be wrong. But thats the beauty of the future. You don't always know.

I don't want to say that most Republicans will be saying it, but the loudest ones will be, especially on this board. Your Rottweillers and thanatos's of the world, for example.

Well I guess you like to dream big, but I'd say there's very little chance that I'll be supporting Romney in four years if he should win.

 

[sitarro]

Deja Vu anyone.......... same bull shit, different players. Total lack of reality...... Ron Paul......a 77 year old burn out......naive much?