beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 45,008
- 16,753
- 2,250
That or either he's just one of them. A cheap - - - - -Garland is compromised. They have dirt on him, bet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That or either he's just one of them. A cheap - - - - -Garland is compromised. They have dirt on him, bet.
Saving America from a fascist boob. That’s what the people will think and go down in the history books. Count on it!It's so obvious what's going on, and you thinking that the American people can't see it uhhhh is certainly obvious that you would defend the devil himself come judgement day.
It's what happens when the nation gets caught up in playing dirty partisan politics when choosing a leader. The Democrat's love fooling their base while attacking everyday average working class income's to pay for it all. Talk about breaking the lock off of the tool shed, and emptying it out with no desire to restock it. That's the Democrat's for ya.The withdrawal was well thought out and Biden fucked it up royally. Seriously I doubt he could have fucked it up worse if he was intentionally trying to. I bet he'd fail at fucking it up worse if he was trying to from sheer incompetence.
If you can convince your people of that right onward, then have at it whilst the rest of us try to make it back out of your dark world.Saving America from a fascist boob. That’s what the people will think and go down in the history books. Count on it!
He can't, because just like he said "he hasn't been charged yet" and if they try it after seeing how pathetic they've been trying to do it over the year's now, then they will seal their fate, and be labeled the Anti-American party forever.........So name one, pls.
You're wrong! I would never defend Donald J Trump come judgement day!It's so obvious what's going on, and you thinking that the American people can't see it uhhhh is certainly obvious that you would defend the devil himself come judgement day.
Or to hide the fact of a political witch hunt with no valid reason and to hide their own illegal actions, again."to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security."
What part of national security do you object to?
Would that be the footage that the FBI wanted the cameras turned off so no one could watch what they were doing?That's just stupid.
It is all on surveillance footage.
No one searched Melania's lingerie.
These kind of claims just show how WEAK any defenses of Trump are.
Who still need a valid reason for their actions, not just political payback.AKA....COPS.
Would that be in response to how the democrats take all the time they need to refine their lies?More Trump Cult bullshit. Forget ever seeing that. It would give away how his prosecution will proceed giving him a chance to refine his lies.
The agents involved in this thing are Strzok's crew.What's the fear of releasing it ? It doesn't compromise any on going investigation. That's total bull crap and you know it.
Every American under the constitution in America is afforded the immediate right to face their accuser's whether on the street during a law enforcement action and again in the court room afterwards.
To hide anything is evidence of the corruption of our law enforcement by political forces. Asking to turn off the security camera system was another red flag in the operation. The waiting period was yet another red flag suggesting politics were involved. Then when doing the history of the FBI during the run up to the 2016 election and afterwards, there were alledged findings of corruption in agents like Comey, Page and Strzok who leaked and covered up information creating narratives that were happily adopted by the MSM for political purposes. Sad situation.
Second hand claims by a biased writer and you believe it because it is what you want to believe.Trump and family watched FBI Mar-a-Lago search on security camera from New York
Christina Bobb says Trump and family ‘probably had a better view... because they had the CCTV’www.independent.co.uk
Isn't that funny how no crimes are alleged before 2016?President Trump's staggering record of uncharged criminal misconduct - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 48 criminal offenses while president or campaigning for the presidency.www.citizensforethics.org
Scroll down the link, there is a chart, with statutes listed, that continues the next 4 pages.
Won't have to, because you will stand in judgement yourself come judgement day, and woe unto you on that day for supporting the Democrat's.You're wrong! I would never defend Donald J Trump come judgement day!
Exactly.Isn't that funny how no crimes are alleged before 2016?
That doesn't strike you as odd at all?
By Him and His lawyers not filing an objection, they did.The affidavit....
Trump never became a legal party for the release of the warrant affidavit...
The camera's we're mysteriously turned off on Epstein also. Hmmmm.Would that be the footage that the FBI wanted the cameras turned off so no one could watch what they were doing?
Nothing fishy about their actions to one such as you who is filled with so much hate.
This is Biden's Katrina.And Biden's Whitehouse is the Titanic... I can hear the music playing as she slips beneath the waves come 2022. But then again the way these McConnell Republicans have been in the past, heck they'll be there with the life boat's trying to help as they take on to much weight and begin sinking themselves also. They are either that stupid to rescue their policies or the Demo-gods have the goods on them. It's one or the other.
Those would be statutes which they claim may be applicable to him and which he possibly maybe could have broken. Allegedly.President Trump's staggering record of uncharged criminal misconduct - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 48 criminal offenses while president or campaigning for the presidency.www.citizensforethics.org
Scroll down the link, there is a chart, with statutes listed, that continues the next 4 pages.
You wouldn’t be in the position to defend anybody,You're wrong! I would never defend Donald J Trump come judgement day!