Garland's DOJ asks court to keep Trump Mar-a-Lago search affidavit sealed

What you and your tawdry ilk overlook is the one thing you should be concerned about:

Trump is only in “crosshairs” because partisan politics has been allowed to take root in our DOJ and in the FBI. That’s ok with you because you’ve been brainwashed into assuming that “orange man bad.” You tools never seem capable of extrapolation. Let me educate you.

I'm sorry but you can't possibly "educate" me. You simply lack the skill.

Thanks for the "offer" though.


 
Especially a rock that has about 5 to 10 times the education you could even think about achieving.
Zzzz. You’re truly quite dull. And since you don’t have any clue about my education, you wouldn’t know if what you just said is true about me.

And none of us know if your claims about yourself are true, either.

You remain a rock.

Back ON TOPIC: Garland should just tell the judge that he believes that the entire thing (except for the names of and identifying information about the allegedly confidential sources, perhaps) should be unsealed and made available to the public.
 
Zzzz. You’re truly quite dull. And since you don’t have any clue about my education, you wouldn’t know if what you just said is true about me.

Statistically speaking is unlikely you have the level of degrees I have. It is not impossible but it is unlikely.

And none of us know if your claims about yourself are true, either.

Correct.

You remain a rock.

That is closer than you might think.

Back ON TOPIC: Garland should just tell the judge that he believes that the entire thing (except for the names of and identifying information about the allegedly confidential sources, perhaps) should be unsealed and made available to the public.

Garland should just do what a prosecutor does and do his job. He doesn't owe YOU a thing until he's done his job to completion.

I love how you guys wanted to lock Hillary up based on what you thought you heard about her, but Trump, oh, no, he must have EVERY accommodation available...so MUCH benefit of the doubt that you'd think he was a saintly, godly man!

Sorry but the double standard is annoying.
 
If Trump or any individual is charged with a crime derived from this warrant, they will get the affidavit contents, thru discovery.

If no one is charged once the Doj investigation is complete, then the affidavit content, will be released to the public, as well.

Right now, the affidavit is part of this on going investigation, and other critical on going investigations of the DOJ.....

Unless the judge has been paid off by Trump, or blackmailed by trump, or afraid for his and family's life due to Trumper misplaced anger.... He will not release this affidavit at this time....no judge would.
What's the fear of releasing it ? It doesn't compromise any on going investigation. That's total bull crap and you know it.

Every American under the constitution in America is afforded the immediate right to face their accuser's whether on the street during a law enforcement action and again in the court room afterwards.

To hide anything is evidence of the corruption of our law enforcement by political forces. Asking to turn off the security camera system was another red flag in the operation. The waiting period was yet another red flag suggesting politics were involved. Then when doing the history of the FBI during the run up to the 2016 election and afterwards, there were alledged findings of corruption in agents like Comey, Page and Strzok who leaked and covered up information creating narratives that were happily adopted by the MSM for political purposes. Sad situation.
 
What's the fear of releasing it ? It doesn't compromise any on going investigation. That's total bull crap and you know it.

Every American under the constitution in America is afforded the immediate right to face their accuser's whether on the street during a law enforcement action and again in the court room afterwards.

To hide anything is evidence of the corruption of our law enforcement by political forces. Asking to turn off the security camera system was another red flag in the operation. The waiting period was yet another red flag suggesting politics were involved. Then when doing the history of the FBI during the run up to the 2016 election and afterwards, there were alledged findings of corruption in agents like Comey, Page and Strzok who leaked and covered up information creating narratives that were happily adopted by the MSM for political purposes. Sad situation.
It's common practice to with hold the affidavit on search warrants.... especially involving national security, and witnesses. Why should it be any different for Trump? The law is executed without FEAR or FAVOR.

Trump never legally filed to release the warrant, never was a party to the suit requesting release.....

WHY?

He truly does not want the public to see it or his weight would have been made a part if the suit....so, he really really really, does not want it to be released to us! He doesn't want us to know, everything he illegally removed.
 
Trump never legally filed to release the warrant, never was a party to the suit requesting release.....

WHY?

He truly does not want the public to see it or his weight would have been made a part if the suit....so, he really really really, does not want it to be released to us! He doesn't want us to know, everything he illegally removed.

DUH......

By ERIC TUCKER and MICHAEL BALSAMO
Associated Press
Published Aug. 11, 2022 Updated Aug. 12, 2022 12:49 PM PT

WASHINGTON —
A federal judge was to decide as soon as Friday whether to grant the Department of Justice’s request to unseal the warrant that authorized the FBI to search former President Trump’s Florida estate. Atty. Gen. Merrick Garland declared there was “substantial public interest in this matter,” and Trump backed the warrant’s “immediate” release.

The decision on whether to unseal the records lay with U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, the same judge who signed off on the search warrant. The Justice Department told the judge Friday afternoon that Trump’s lawyers did not object to the proposal to make it public.

In messages posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “Not only will I not oppose the release of documents ... I am going a step further by ENCOURAGING the immediate release of those documents.”
 
Especially a rock that has about 5 to 10 times the education you could even think about achieving.
Sorry....no.
You cannot be very "educated" if you support/defend/make excuses for Trump.
You have to be stupid.
Or maybe this "education" you speak of was purchased at Trump University?
 
Statistically speaking is unlikely you have the level of degrees I have. It is not impossible but it is unlikely.



Correct.



That is closer than you might think.



Garland should just do what a prosecutor does and do his job. He doesn't owe YOU a thing until he's done his job to completion.

I love how you guys wanted to lock Hillary up based on what you thought you heard about her, but Trump, oh, no, he must have EVERY accommodation available...so MUCH benefit of the doubt that you'd think he was a saintly, godly man!

Sorry but the double standard is annoying.
Doosh.
 
DUH......

By ERIC TUCKER and MICHAEL BALSAMO
Associated Press
Published Aug. 11, 2022 Updated Aug. 12, 2022 12:49 PM PT

WASHINGTON —
A federal judge was to decide as soon as Friday whether to grant the Department of Justice’s request to unseal the warrant that authorized the FBI to search former President Trump’s Florida estate. Atty. Gen. Merrick Garland declared there was “substantial public interest in this matter,” and Trump backed the warrant’s “immediate” release.

The decision on whether to unseal the records lay with U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, the same judge who signed off on the search warrant. The Justice Department told the judge Friday afternoon that Trump’s lawyers did not object to the proposal to make it public.

In messages posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “Not only will I not oppose the release of documents ... I am going a step further by ENCOURAGING the immediate release of those documents.”
The affidavit....

Trump never became a legal party for the release of the warrant affidavit...
 
POS trump started the withdrawal and was so incompetent that he couldn't finish the job.

He was too busy crying Fake News, Stolen Election, Drain my Swamp, and "No, I don't take responsibility at ALL."




Classic Trump.

The withdrawal was well thought out and Biden fucked it up royally. Seriously I doubt he could have fucked it up worse if he was intentionally trying to. I bet he'd fail at ******* it up worse if he was trying to from sheer incompetence.
 
15th post
Garland’s protecting the integrity of the investigation, a concept with which Trumpistas aren’t very familiar.
Garland is compromised. They have dirt on him, bet.
 
Last edited:
Might call that a 'tip of the Iceberg'....:biggrin:
And Biden's Whitehouse is the Titanic... I can hear the music playing as she slips beneath the waves come 2022. But then again the way these McConnell Republicans have been in the past, heck they'll be there with the life boat's trying to help as they take on to much weight and begin sinking themselves also. They are either that stupid to rescue their policies or the Demo-gods have the goods on them. It's one or the other.
 

Scroll down the link, there is a chart, with statutes listed, that continues the next 4 pages.
It's so obvious what's going on, and you thinking that the American people can't see it uhhhh is certainly obvious that you would defend the devil himself come judgement day.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom