Pathetic, indeed! The situation indeed suggests that Your New Messiah has failed you or, perhaps, lied about the jobs picture being so rosy. So which is more pathetic? The job situation? The lies?
Can you even come up with legitimate evidence that Obama has hindered economic growth? No you cannot.
OH MY GOD!!!" "Can you even come up with legitimate evidence that Obama has hindered economic growth? No you cannot."
1)Obama wants higher gas prices... "
I'd like higher gas prices, just not so quickly"
LiveLeak.com - Obama: Id like higher gas prices, just not so quickly
2)"
Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."
Obama: I?ll make energy prices ?skyrocket? « Hot Air
3)
"I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care program" Barack Obama on single payer in 2003 | Physicians for a National Health Program
1) EPA itself estimated that its ozone standard would cost $90 billion a year,
while other studies have projected that the rule could cost upwards of a trillion dollars and destroy 7.4 million jobs.
2)Boiler MACT Rule: EPA's Boiler MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) standards are so strict that not even the best-performing sources can meet them, so many companies will have no choice but to shut their doors and ship manufacturing jobs overseas.
The rule has been projected to reduce US GDP by as much as 1.2 billion dollars and will destroy nearly 800,000 jobs.
Articles: Obama's EPA Plans for 2013
Scores of power plants and as many as 1.6 million jobs would be lost between 2012 and 2020
if the EPA proceeds with air- and water-quality regulations, according to a recent study by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity.
"In the area of energy, EPA has been very, very aggressive, much of this based on their global-warming campaign, and the effect is troubling on the energy sector," says Diane Katz, a research fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation. "If coal plants are closing down because they can't meet standards EPA is setting, well, those are jobs lost."
Is the EPA really a 'jobs killer'? - CSMonitor.com