Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He's not a Chief....he's an E-7.I see all you claiming it is some heinous crime can not explain why the Navy only punished Chief Gallagher.
Chief Petty Officer E-7 and don't argue with me.He's not a Chief....he's an E-7.I see all you claiming it is some heinous crime can not explain why the Navy only punished Chief Gallagher.
E-7 is a Chief, bull.He's not a Chief....he's an E-7.I see all you claiming it is some heinous crime can not explain why the Navy only punished Chief Gallagher.
I'm really beginning to question whether the resident bull was really was in the military, let alone an aviator.Chief Petty Officer E-7 and don't argue with me.He's not a Chief....he's an E-7.I see all you claiming it is some heinous crime can not explain why the Navy only punished Chief Gallagher.
Since when is a picture of a dead murdering Muslim a war crime to anyone that has a brain, and how many THOUSANDS of these types of pictures were taken by our men ever since WW I until today. Shall we go back and look for a man smiling next to a dead German, Korean, or Viet Cong that was trying to kill our brave men, But lost in their efforts....AND WHY WOULD THE SURRENDER MONKEY FIRE 197 HIGH RANKING MILITARY MEN IN 5 YEARS except That he was a traitor to our military and wanting our soldiers DEAD with his asinine ROE put on our troops IN WAR?....Those are questions that need answering!Keep on supporting war criminals while ignoring the hundreds of thousands who serve....managing to NOT commit war crimes.
I see you can not answer the question.Keep on supporting war criminals while ignoring the hundreds of thousands who serve....managing to NOT commit war crimes.
For those who are not keeping up with the latest brou haha....I would appreciate someone answering the OP's question instead of avoiding it.Keep on supporting war criminals while ignoring the hundreds of thousands who serve....managing to NOT commit war crimes.
She doesn't know a Chief from a slick sleeve....What you think you're going to get?.....I see you can not answer the question.Keep on supporting war criminals while ignoring the hundreds of thousands who serve....managing to NOT commit war crimes.
It is when you are a political party that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING but a phony impeachment to DRAG OUT and never vote on in order NOT to give us anything of substance!.She will never give you a answer that will make sense!And its not a war crime to kill the enemy.
I believe that she (?) *has claimed* to have been a Navy aviator.....But I now doubt whether she knows the landing gear switch from the flap switch, let alone has been a military flier.She claims to have been in the Air force but thinks that a pay grade is a rank. I guess I can believe that the air force are civilians in bus driver uniforms anyway.
If as some of you claim it a WAR CRIME to take a picture with a dead enemy, then please PLEASE explain why ONLY Chief Gallagher was charged, every member of his team was in the picture as well as his LT. Yet NOT A SINGLE ONE BESIDES Gallagher was punished.
And its not a war crime to kill the enemy.
In other words vindictive and petty.If as some of you claim it a WAR CRIME to take a picture with a dead enemy, then please PLEASE explain why ONLY Chief Gallagher was charged, every member of his team was in the picture as well as his LT. Yet NOT A SINGLE ONE BESIDES Gallagher was punished.
Because Gallegher is a maniac the Navy wanted out.
The Navy knew it couldn't prove the actual war crimes he committed because of legal technicalities, but they had him dead to rights on this one.
