Gabbard is DNI

[Lesh]

It's a fuck you to democrats identifyng her as a terrorist

Hell of a reason to chose someone charged with defending the nation

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Hell of a reason to chose someone charged with defending the nation

It was a democrat recommendation.

 

[Lesh]

It was a democrat recommendation.

By who?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

By who?

The democrats that put her on a terrorist watch list.

 

[Lesh]

The democrats that put her on a terrorist watch list.

That’s stupid and insane

 

[otto105]

I'm so glad he picked Pete Hegseth for SECDEF. Pete is such a great guy. Fewer people more qualified. Multiple combat medals, served in Iraq and Afghanistan, guard at Gitmo.

He’s part of the hand washing crowd.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

That’s stupid and insane

Yes, putting Tulsi Gabbard on a terrorist watch list is stupid and insane.

 

[SmokeALib]

Hell of a reason to chose someone charged with defending the nation

I like it.

 

[SmokeALib]

That’s stupid and insane

Yes it was. I bet they don't do it again.

 

[Nobody911]

What's your complaint about Gabbard, other than she called a spade a spade in regard to your party?

Tulsi Gabbard is a former United States Representative from Hawaii and a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. Her character and qualifications have been subject to various assessments, and opinions about her suitability for a role like Director of National Intelligence (DNI) are mixed.

Some positive aspects of her character and qualifications include:

1. Military service: Gabbard is a veteran of the Iraq War and has served in the Hawaii Army National Guard. This experience could be valuable in understanding the military and intelligence communities.
2. Congressional experience: As a member of the House of Representatives, Gabbard served on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which could provide her with a solid understanding of national security and intelligence issues.
3. Independent thinking: Gabbard has been known for her willingness to challenge her own party's views and take unpopular stances on certain issues, which could be an asset in a role that requires objective analysis and decision-making.

However, some concerns have been raised about her character and qualifications, including:

1. Foreign policy views: Gabbard has been criticized for her views on foreign policy, particularly her stance on Syria and her meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017. Some have questioned her judgment and ability to navigate complex international relationships.
2. Russia and Assad ties: Gabbard has been accused of being too sympathetic to Russia and Assad, which could raise concerns about her ability to provide objective intelligence assessments and make decisions that are in the best interest of the United States.
3. Lack of intelligence experience: While Gabbard has served on committees related to national security, she does not have direct experience working in the intelligence community, which could be a disadvantage in a role that requires a deep understanding of intelligence operations and analysis.

Ultimately, whether or not Tulsi Gabbard would be a suitable candidate for Director of National Intelligence depends on one's perspective on her character and qualifications. While she has some positive attributes, her views on foreign policy and lack of direct intelligence experience may raise concerns about her ability to lead the intelligence community effectively.

Gee, Gabbard doesn't like being spied on during her activities. However, she has to take responsibility for spying jobs. I really want to know how she feels right now. lol.

 

[Rawley]

Tulsi Gabbard is a former United States Representative from Hawaii and a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. Her character and qualifications have been subject to various assessments, and opinions about her suitability for a role like Director of National Intelligence (DNI) are mixed.

Some positive aspects of her character and qualifications include:

1. Military service: Gabbard is a veteran of the Iraq War and has served in the Hawaii Army National Guard. This experience could be valuable in understanding the military and intelligence communities.
2. Congressional experience: As a member of the House of Representatives, Gabbard served on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which could provide her with a solid understanding of national security and intelligence issues.
3. Independent thinking: Gabbard has been known for her willingness to challenge her own party's views and take unpopular stances on certain issues, which could be an asset in a role that requires objective analysis and decision-making.

However, some concerns have been raised about her character and qualifications, including:

1. Foreign policy views: Gabbard has been criticized for her views on foreign policy, particularly her stance on Syria and her meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017. Some have questioned her judgment and ability to navigate complex international relationships.
2. Russia and Assad ties: Gabbard has been accused of being too sympathetic to Russia and Assad, which could raise concerns about her ability to provide objective intelligence assessments and make decisions that are in the best interest of the United States.
3. Lack of intelligence experience: While Gabbard has served on committees related to national security, she does not have direct experience working in the intelligence community, which could be a disadvantage in a role that requires a deep understanding of intelligence operations and analysis.

Ultimately, whether or not Tulsi Gabbard would be a suitable candidate for Director of National Intelligence depends on one's perspective on her character and qualifications. While she has some positive attributes, her views on foreign policy and lack of direct intelligence experience may raise concerns about her ability to lead the intelligence community effectively.

Gee, Gabbard doesn't like being spied on during her activities. However, she has to take responsibility for spying jobs. I really want to know how she feels right now. lol.

seems you feel only members of the swamp are qualified. Don't you see a problem with this?

 

[gtopa1]

Don't you need at least some rudimentary intelligence before you can be director of intelligence?

Tulsi went further in the Selection Process for Dem Nominee than Kamala. A low bar I know but better than your actual Nominee just defeated by a LOT!!!

Greg

 

[scruffy]

President-elect Donald J. Trump on Wednesday chose Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman who became one of his most enthusiastic backers, to serve as the director of national intelligence.

Trump Chooses Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence

Ms. Gabbard, a former congresswoman who left the Democratic Party, would hold a top job in the administration, overseeing 18 spy agencies.

www.nytimes.com

Yikes! The nuts are running the asylum. Blind loyalty has it's rewards.

Didn't figure you'd like it.

Tulsi is a great choice.

Hopefully she'll restore some sanity to the concept of national intelligence.

Hint: allowing 12 million unvetted illegals into the country is national stupidity.

 

[scruffy]

Right wing "qualifications", in a nutshell

Left wing qualifications in a nutshell

 

[scruffy]

These are the picks of someone who is just not very serious about governing.

lol

You'll be singing a different tune next year.

 

[scruffy]

It appears she has no experience in the intelligence field.

Am I wrong?

Yes

 

[scruffy]

I know you don’t know, otherwise you would not be supportive of these nutbags in such serious positions.

lol

Dem heads exploding is delicious.

 

[scruffy]

That’s stupid and insane

That's Mayorkas. Stupid and insane.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

You have proof of this? She served two tours in Iraq.

Fort Fun Indiana is now even more on the fringe as Trump crushed the popular vote. I put that poster on ignore a long time ago. He provides propaganda,trolling, one liners , mostly low to no substance posts. But he’s harmless.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what the radical left-wingers on the US message board say. Like how they call people racist, Russian sympathizers, Nazis , etc . By the way, they don’t even see how hateful they are. Like how they call somebody a “Russian troll”. Imagine if they call people Jew trolls or black trolls.

They’re completely powerless to do anything. And they’re going to witness one of the greatest American economies in US history under Trumps 2nd term. Just like Trump brought us a great economy during his first term.

 

[westwall]

The defense secretary is Loyd Austin at the moment. Who do you think it is?

Yeah, we know. Another worthless DEI hire.