Gabbard is DNI

I denigrate picking people according to DEI.
it would be pretty racist and/or bigoted to see a minority of some sort and assume they’re only in their position because of their minority status.

I think that gay people and minorities can ready prominent positions because they earned it. Apparently you don’t.
 
it would be pretty racist and/or bigoted to see a minority of some sort and assume they’re only in their position because of their minority status.

I think that gay people and minorities can ready prominent positions because they earned it. Apparently you don’t.
They CAN be. But when you announce that your priority objective is diversity rather than merit, in the majority of cases you end up with a poor choice. You think Pete “earned” his spot as Transportation Sec? Or that Cackles “earned” her spot as VP? Or that KJP “earned” her spot as Press Secretary? They were all picked because they checked a diversity box - and they were all lousy at the jobs.

And that is why the Biden Admin was such a disaster. One of the reasons, anyway.
 
I have no idea what she has done that would qualify her for this position. Do you?
I asked Why is she not qualified?

I don’t think you have an answer, you just are throwing a temper tantrum about how you and your woke Warhawk inflation ideology got smacked down. You should stop and think about things rather than angrily spewing frustration
 
They CAN be. But when you announce that your priority objective is diversity rather than merit, in the majority of cases you end up with a poor choice. You think Pete “earned” his spot as Transportation Sec? Or that Cackles “earned” her spot as VP? Or that KJP “earned” her spot as Press Secretary? They were all picked because they checked a diversity box - and they were all lousy at the jobs.

And that is why the Biden Admin was such a disaster. One of the reasons, anyway.
When did Biden say he picked Bittigieg because he was gay?
 
I asked Why is she not qualified?

I don’t think you have an answer, you just are throwing a temper tantrum about how you and your woke Warhawk inflation ideology got smacked down. You should stop and think about things rather than angrily spewing frustration
It appears she has no experience in the intelligence field.

Am I wrong?
 
It appears she has no experience in the intelligence field.

Am I wrong?
You’re wrong

Committee on Homeland Security (2013–2014) Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
Committee on Armed Services (2013–2021) Subcommittee on Readiness. ...
Committee on Foreign Affairs (2013–2019) Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific. ...
 
He served in the military and went to good schools.

According to Trump supporters, that makes you qualified to be secretary of defense.
20 years in the military two Bronze Stars, two Army Commendation Medals, the National Defense Service Medal with Bronze Service Star, and the expert infantryman and combat infantryman badges, combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Two Ivy league schools. Outstanding communicator.

Yes he's qualified. We've seen how the "experienced" generals from the military industrial complex can fuck things up.
 
President-elect Donald J. Trump on Wednesday chose Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman who became one of his most enthusiastic backers, to serve as the director of national intelligence.

Yikes! The nuts are running the asylum. Blind loyalty has it's rewards.
The person who put her on the terrorist watch list is likely in trouble....
 
It appears she has no experience in the intelligence field.

Am I wrong?
Did you whine about Mayor Pete as transportation secretary or Kamala as border Czar?

No.

So.. you have no credibility
 
Well how about...SHE IS A FUCKING NUTBAG, who spent her time peddling conspiracy theories and baseless Kremlin bullshit.

Putting her in charge of American Intelligence would be like putting JFK in charge of Health.......aw fuck. :uhh:

Look, bottom line with these comedic nominations is that old dog Trump hasn't wised up and is hellbent on remaining one of the worst Presidents in history.
There is nothing crazy about her claims. I don't know if they are true or false. Ask her for her proof.
Compared to Biden's open borders, Tulsi's claims are not National Security disasters, like letting in Chinese, Russians, criminals, and terrorists..
 
Last edited:
It’s a hard sell for you to pretend you’re suddenly a moderate in the middle.

Im not certain I've ever argued that.


Your woke, leftist ideology got smacked to the floor. I mean.. if you genuinely see how radical the democrats have become, bravo. But I doubt you’ll think twice when it comes to voting day and rhetoric

Porcupines.
 
It just cracks me up to see all these radical leftists on here do a 180 on standards for politicians IMMEDIATELY.

It’s like a switch flipped in their brains.. from “DEFEND ALL BIDEN/HARRIS DECISIONS” to “ATTACK ALL TRUMP DECISIONS WITH MAX HYPERBOLE AND DRAMA”

Nobody buys it guys
 
I didn't. I did wonder though what the hell she was doing as a bloody DemoKKKrat when she aligned far more closely with where she is now. I have always thought highly of her and frankly she is I think where she belongs. She was Pro-life early on and compromised that to survive as a Dem; maybe now she appreciates that she was right then. (Given her sad personal experiences).

Nah; Tulsi has always been a goodun but just in the wrong Party imo.

Greg

I think she was a pre-Obama Democrat.

Against war mongering. Against the government spying on citizens.

That went over poorly after Obama.
 
Back
Top Bottom