- Mar 1, 2008
- 49,937
- 17,317
- 2,250
I kinda figured that out about him many eons ago.lol
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ga. Gov Kemp forced to call for ‘signature audit’ after Trump legal team presents shocking footage
- Thread starter Billiejeens
- Start date
During a Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Thursday, President Donald Trump’s legal team presented surveillance footage that they claimed showed election supervisors in Fulton County booting poll workers and then suspiciously pulling out “suitcases” and continuing to count more ballots themselves.
“Jacki Pick, a lawyer who is volunteering with the campaign’s legal case, said the team received video footage from State Farm Arena’s vote-tabulation center in Fulton County, Georgia,” The Epoch Times reported after the hearing.
Ga. Gov Kemp forced to call for ‘signature audit’ after Trump legal team presents shocking footage
President Donald Trump's legal team presented surveillance footage from Georgia showing election officials booting poll workers and then counting ballots.www.bizpacreview.com
BJ - Allowing the NBA to set up fraud centers inside their arenas was an unforced error in protecting The Constitution.
No one pulled out any suitcases. The story has already been debunked by election officials who investigated it.
Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave | Lead Stories
Kemp is just trying to save his neck.
And I want the people in the video prosecuted to the full extent of the law....their names should be known by everyone and their right to vote revoked forever.....
For doing their jobs? You people are the ones who should be arrested.
What are you going to believe?....CNN or your own eyes?...we can clearly see them counting votes after they sent the GOP poll watchers home....that dumbass is against the law.....Which in this case means there’s no prosecution.And I want the people in the video prosecuted to the full extent of the law....their names should be known by everyone and their right to vote revoked forever.....
No laws were broken.
Gabriel Sterling, a Republican and Georgia's voting system implementation manager, told Lead Stories during a phone call on December 3, 2020 that what can be seen on the video is normal procedure and nothing looks "bizarre or odd."
Election workers known as "cutters" because their job was to open absentee ballot envelopes and verify ballots for eventual scanning and counting were dismissed for the night sometime after 10 p.m. on November 3, 2020, because their work for the evening had been completed, he explained. Those workers who remained were responsible for conducting the scanning portion of the process, since ballots could not be left without being scanned overnight. He said:
Frances Watson, chief investigator for the Georgia secretary of state, told Lead Stories during a phone call on December 3, 2020, that the ballots were in standard containers, and the work during the time in question had nothing to do with pulling ballots from under a table. She said:"If you look at the video tape, the work you see is the work you would expect, which is you take the sealed suitcase looking things in, you place the ballots on the scanner in manageable batches and you scan them."
There was never an announcement made to the media and other observers about the counting being over for the night and them needing to leave, according to Watson, who was provided information by the media liaison, who was present. She said they just followed the "cutters" as they left."There wasn't a bin that had ballots in it under that table. It was an empty bin and the ballots from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there, and then it was placed back into the box when the media were still there and placed next to the table."
She said:
In addition, she explained that the only ballots that were scanned after the media and other observers had left were those that had already been opened in front of these observers."Nobody told them to stay. Nobody told them to leave. Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do. And It was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to, as long as they were still working."
"Contrary to the claim, the ballots were not in suitcases, she said. The black boxes and bins seen in the video are the standard container used for the ballot counting process."
A state election board monitor, who asked for his name not to be used due to safety concerns, told Lead Stories on the phone on December 3, 2020, that he was present at the vote counting location beginning at 11:52 p.m., after leaving briefly at earlier in the evening. He then stayed until about 12:45 a.m., when the work that night was completed.
The deputy chief investigator for the secretary of state's office was present beginning at 12:15 a.m. November 4, he said.
Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave | Lead Stories
We became a banana Republic back when you cheated Bernie Sanders out of The Nomination. We are a banana Republic now because our elections are not secured and are invalid due to massive cheating by The DemNazis Party.The Governor can call for it all he wants but the order must come from a Judge because, we are still a nation of laws that even Banana Republicans must follow.
We have to take The Republic Back by any means necessary. Playing nice is over.
Hillary Clinton got around 54% of the vote to Biden's 42%. Tell me how 42% is greater than 54%. Hikllary Clinton got a majority of the primary vote so why shouldm't she get the nomination?
OK, I'll give it a shot:Too many double negatives for me to make heads or tails of what you are asking.Unless those empty envelopes are stacked neatly in the same order as the ballots, They don't have nearly enough time for an audit. I guess they can tell us how it went after Inauguration Day.
But you're not claiming that Democrats didn't steal the election, or that there isn't evidence....are you.
Gee....that sounds like the usual tap dancing by a Leftist.
I'm claiming that the Democrats didn't steal the election and there's no evidence of that occurring.
How's that for the old soft shoe?
The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!
CAMPAIGN 2020
Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!
Extremely suspicious.
Published
7 hours ago
on
Nov 22, 2020
By
Richard Moorhead
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.
Top of Form
Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.
Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.
Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!
Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.
Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”
Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics
===============================================
Georgia:
Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:
….and run through counting machines, over and over.
=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?
Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....
This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.
When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.
Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.
"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm
© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."
Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE
neonnettle.com
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf
Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.
Colonel Phil Waldron Statement - Hearing On Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania - Nov 25, 2020
Colonel Phil Waldron is a retired army colonel, who served in the United States Military for 30 years. He spent the first half of his military career as an o...www.youtube.com
Is a sworn affidavit evidence?
An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.
… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH
AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;
. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit
AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17
Not one thing has been proven. Again Trump supporters are clutching at straws. A Republican legislator made a good point. If extra votes were slipped in then the poll books and the number of votes would be off.
Anyone can make a statement under penalty of perjury. The fact is that they are very unlikely to be charged since the prosecutors would have to prove their state of mind.
Biden if he takes office will be responsible for WWIII. These people who thought they were getting a free crap card will be getting a draft card so they can die for the Glory of The Great Reset.Oh the Irony,two peas in a pod,kinda like everybodyfor years told you the same thing with your babble that warmonger traiter reagan was a great president and that warmonger traiter asshole bush was any differerent than Obama, takes one to know one.Allowing poll watchers to observe does not make a requirement for them to observe.Because in every reference , the law says poll watchers are permitted in places but does not say they are required to be there.
So, tell me. What is the point of that law, where "may have" means "don't have to" as you have retardedly interpreted?
God damn. You are obviously NOT a lawyer. You should just shut the fuck up while you're MILES behind.
This is pretty simple.Someone like yourself should be able to understand it.
What a disgusting lying low-life you are.
But you must get tired of hearing that all day.
The law was posted. The law confirms I’m right. Watchers allowed to be there to observe counting. They are not required to be there. Counting can continue if no watchers are present.Nope. I’m right.You are 100% wrong on both accounts.....do you want to try again?....They didn’t send GOP poll watchers home. There is no law that ballots can only be counted if poll watchers are present.What are you going to believe?....CNN or your own eyes?...we can clearly see them counting votes after they sent the GOP poll watchers home....that dumbass is against the law.....Which in this case means there’s no prosecution.And I want the people in the video prosecuted to the full extent of the law....their names should be known by everyone and their right to vote revoked forever.....
No laws were broken.
Of course you are, just ask you.
An independent observer appointed by the county was present the entire time.
You are right as often as cats are mentioned in the Bible.
If you were correct, there'd be no reason for the law at all.
Your sort of word-play is why 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
During a Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Thursday, President Donald Trump’s legal team presented surveillance footage that they claimed showed election supervisors in Fulton County booting poll workers and then suspiciously pulling out “suitcases” and continuing to count more ballots themselves.
“Jacki Pick, a lawyer who is volunteering with the campaign’s legal case, said the team received video footage from State Farm Arena’s vote-tabulation center in Fulton County, Georgia,” The Epoch Times reported after the hearing.
Ga. Gov Kemp forced to call for ‘signature audit’ after Trump legal team presents shocking footage
President Donald Trump's legal team presented surveillance footage from Georgia showing election officials booting poll workers and then counting ballots.
BJ - Allowing the NBA to set up fraud centers inside their arenas was an unforced error in protecting The Constitution.
No one pulled out any suitcases. The story has already been debunked by election officials who investigated it.
Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave | Lead Stories
Kemp is just trying to save his neck.
Georgia:
Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
That makes no sense to anyone with a shred of logic which is in short supply on the Trump side.If you were correct, there'd be no reason for the law at all.
And I want the people in the video prosecuted to the full extent of the law....their names should be known by everyone and their right to vote revoked forever.....
For doing their jobs? You people are the ones who should be arrested.
That makes no sense to anyone with a shred of logic which is in short supply on the Trump side.If you were correct, there'd be no reason for the law at all.
I'd say your post identifies you as a liar, but, of course, that is a long foregone conclusion.
We became a banana Republic back when you cheated Bernie Sanders out of The Nomination. We are a banana Republic now because our elections are not secured and are invalid due to massive cheating by The DemNazis Party.The Governor can call for it all he wants but the order must come from a Judge because, we are still a nation of laws that even Banana Republicans must follow.
We have to take The Republic Back by any means necessary. Playing nice is over.
Hillary Clinton got around 54% of the vote to Biden's 42%. Tell me how 42% is greater than 54%. Hikllary Clinton got a majority of the primary vote so why shouldm't she get the nomination?
You must really be nervous....one spelling error per sentence.
Calm down, Sméagol, the Precious will be yours once the Hobbits are dead.
OK, I'll give it a shot:Too many double negatives for me to make heads or tails of what you are asking.Unless those empty envelopes are stacked neatly in the same order as the ballots, They don't have nearly enough time for an audit. I guess they can tell us how it went after Inauguration Day.
But you're not claiming that Democrats didn't steal the election, or that there isn't evidence....are you.
Gee....that sounds like the usual tap dancing by a Leftist.
I'm claiming that the Democrats didn't steal the election and there's no evidence of that occurring.
How's that for the old soft shoe?
The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!
CAMPAIGN 2020
Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!
Extremely suspicious.
Published
7 hours ago
on
Nov 22, 2020
By
Richard Moorhead
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.
Top of Form
Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.
Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.
Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!
Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.
Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”
Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics
===============================================
Georgia:
Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:
….and run through counting machines, over and over.
=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?
Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....
This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.
When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.
Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.
"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm
© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."
Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE
neonnettle.com
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf
Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.
Colonel Phil Waldron Statement - Hearing On Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania - Nov 25, 2020
Colonel Phil Waldron is a retired army colonel, who served in the United States Military for 30 years. He spent the first half of his military career as an o...
Is a sworn affidavit evidence?
An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.
… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH
AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;
. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit
AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17
Not one thing has been proven. Again Trump supporters are clutching at straws. A Republican legislator made a good point. If extra votes were slipped in then the poll books and the number of votes would be off.
Anyone can make a statement under penalty of perjury. The fact is that they are very unlikely to be charged since the prosecutors would have to prove their state of mind.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
I imagine if you had a logical rebuttal to my comment, we’d have seen it by now.That makes no sense to anyone with a shred of logic which is in short supply on the Trump side.If you were correct, there'd be no reason for the law at all.
I'd say your post identifies you as a liar, but, of course, that is a long foregone conclusion.
However all you’ve provided is ad hominem attack which leads me to conclude you have no rebuttal.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,201
- 2,180
That's wrong, asshole. video shows people pulling out suitcases from underneath a table the minute all the observers left the room.During a Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Thursday, President Donald Trump’s legal team presented surveillance footage that they claimed showed election supervisors in Fulton County booting poll workers and then suspiciously pulling out “suitcases” and continuing to count more ballots themselves.
“Jacki Pick, a lawyer who is volunteering with the campaign’s legal case, said the team received video footage from State Farm Arena’s vote-tabulation center in Fulton County, Georgia,” The Epoch Times reported after the hearing.
Ga. Gov Kemp forced to call for ‘signature audit’ after Trump legal team presents shocking footage
President Donald Trump's legal team presented surveillance footage from Georgia showing election officials booting poll workers and then counting ballots.
BJ - Allowing the NBA to set up fraud centers inside their arenas was an unforced error in protecting The Constitution.
No one pulled out any suitcases. The story has already been debunked by election officials who investigated it.
Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave | Lead Stories
Kemp is just trying to save his neck.
That's not a post, it's a set of encyclopedias.The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
That's not a post, it's a set of encyclopedias.The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
I have no desire to dumb down my post simply because you're not up to the requirements of education.
Here's the Cliff Notes version: I proved you wrong.
I don't feel wrong. You didn't prove shit.That's not a post, it's a set of encyclopedias.The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
I have no desire to dumb down my post simply because you're not up to the requirements of education.
Here's the Cliff Notes version: I proved you wrong.
I don't feel wrong. You didn't prove shit.That's not a post, it's a set of encyclopedias.The only difference between Custer’s Last Stand and what I’m about to do to you is that Custer didn’t have to read the post afterwards.
I have no desire to dumb down my post simply because you're not up to the requirements of education.
Here's the Cliff Notes version: I proved you wrong.
None of that juvenile vulgarity. Vulgarity from the Left indicates I've hit a nerve.
You claimed it was too long, suggesting you didn't read it, and certainly weren't able to deny any of what I provided, so you really don't know what I proved.
Take my word for it.
I proved it.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 625
- Views
- 22K
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 979
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 942
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 67
- Views
- 323
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 127
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8049
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-