Furious Pelosi Rants on MSNBC, Dismisses Explosive New Video Admitting She’s Responsible for Lack of National Guard on J6!

[HikerGuy83]

Teabaggers always overlook who is responsible for the traitors, being there in the FIRST place.

Trump promises 'wild' protest in DC on Jan. 6, the day ...​

View attachment 960546
FOX 5 DC
https://www.fox5dc.com › news › trump-promises-wild...
Dec 19, 2020 — Be there, will be wild!" Jan. 6 is the day Congress will meet to accept the presidential election results. President ...

You mean the so-called cheaters in the electoral process ?

 

[WEATHER53]

She’s all over the place today being hung over snd angry.

 

[Nostra]

Holy **** Q-NUT.
Cut back to one gallon a day of Trump's kool-aid.

View attachment 963624

Post 261.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu › ... › CHAPTER 115
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives ...

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy - Law.Cornell.Edu​

LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu › ... › CHAPTER 115
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, ...

How Seditious Conspiracy Is Different From Insurrection ...​

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2023/05/25 › what-is-sediti...
May 25, 2023 — What is seditious conspiracy? ... It is a federal crime found in Section 2384 of Title 18 of the United States code. ... In the Oath Keepers case, ...

So, no insurrection charges.

Got it.

 

[WEATHER53]

So, no insurrection charges.

Got it.

Another media inspired lie. No charges and its like lib loons by the millions proclaiming that a slap across the face is intended murder and then having their shill media run with that falsehood

 

[kyzr]

I hope some Republicans saved that video of Nancy taking responsibility for denying Trump's early request for 10,000 National Guard troops for J6.

I know Kash has the letter from Bowser also denying NG troops because her police were adequate.
Where were they during the J6 riot?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You mean the so-called cheaters in the electoral process ?

Those too.

How the fake electors in seven states are central to ...​

Arizona Mirror
https://azmirror.com › 2023/08/03 › how-the-fake-elect...
Aug 3, 2023 — The campaigns to recruit false electors in each differed, according to the indictment. Arizona. Trump's allies pressured the Republican speaker ...

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So, no insurrection charges.

So?

Got it.

Seditious conspiracy is worse.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Pelosi should be put under oath and testify if she did or did not shut down the request from the Capitol Police for National Guard support for J6.

 

[Faun]

NANCY AND BOWSER REFUSED TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARD IN AS REQUESTED BY TRUMP AND CAPITOL POLICE CHIEF SUND.

WHAT HAPPENED ON J6 WAS THEIR FAULT.

THERE WAS NO "INSURRECTION", JUST A DERELICTION OF RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE CAPITOL, AS REQUESTED.

SMITH'S J6 CASE NEEDS TO BE DISMISSED.

Trump never mentioned National Guard to Pelosi or Bowser. Trump was commander-in-chief and only made a comment in passing to his army secretary, who didn't take him seriously and didn't act on it.

 

[kyzr]

Trump never mentioned National Guard to Pelosi or Bowser. Trump was commander-in-chief and only made a comment in passing to his army secretary, who didn't take him seriously and didn't act on it.

At a meeting before J6 Trump said "fill the request" for NG troops. See letter from Bowser in Kash Patel's link below. In a separate request to Nancy Pelosi via her direct report Sgt at Arms Irving for NG troops, Sund was denied troops because of "optics". So two early and separate requests for NG troops for J6 were denied by Bowser and Pelosi.

Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat'l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg said President Donald Trump requested National Guard deployments in Washington D.C. before Jan. 6, 2021.

americanmilitarynews.com

Kellogg, who was serving as Vice President Mike Pence’s National Security Advisor at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol breach, tweeted last week, “To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, ‘On 3 Jan the President asked the Def Dept to deploy NG troops’ into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony. Release Army Guard and DC Mayor J6 testimonies as well. Would be illuminating.”

DC Mayor Bowser’s Letter Refusing National Guard on January 6

Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser sends a letter to the Acting United States Attorney General, Secretary of the Army, and...

fightwithkash.com

MSN

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots | NPR

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.kcrw.com

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.
Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

 

[Faun]

At a meeting before J6 Trump said "fill the request" for NG troops. See letter from Bowser in Kash Patel's link below. In a separate request to Nancy Pelosi via her direct report Sgt at Arms Irving for NG troops, Sund was denied troops because of "optics". So two early and separate requests for NG troops for J6 were denied by Bowser and Pelosi.

Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat'l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg said President Donald Trump requested National Guard deployments in Washington D.C. before Jan. 6, 2021.

americanmilitarynews.com

Kellogg, who was serving as Vice President Mike Pence’s National Security Advisor at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol breach, tweeted last week, “To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, ‘On 3 Jan the President asked the Def Dept to deploy NG troops’ into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony. Release Army Guard and DC Mayor J6 testimonies as well. Would be illuminating.”

DC Mayor Bowser’s Letter Refusing National Guard on January 6

Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser sends a letter to the Acting United States Attorney General, Secretary of the Army, and...

fightwithkash.com

MSN

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots | NPR

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.kcrw.com

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.
Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Nothing in that letter indicates Trump asked her to deploy the DCNG. And why would he ask her when he had the authority to have them deployed?

 

[kyzr]

Nothing in that letter indicates Trump asked her to deploy the DCNG. And why would he ask her when he had the authority to have them deployed?

1. The letter was addressed to SECDEF Miller, advising him that the DC police were adequate.

2. Capitol Police Chief Sund's early request for the NG was denied by Sgt at Arms Irving based on Pelosi's direction.

3. At that time the Trump WH was told that requests for the NG had to come from Pelosi or Bowser. Trump did not nationalize the NG as if there was a national emergency. Normally the NG are under the state governor's control unless there is a national emergency.

4. Pelosi's video nails it down, doesn't it?

 

[jc456]

So?

Seditious conspiracy is worse.

when you sleep it is.

 

[jc456]

Trump never mentioned National Guard to Pelosi or Bowser. Trump was commander-in-chief and only made a comment in passing to his army secretary, who didn't take him seriously and didn't act on it.

you were there? why aren't you locked up?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

when you sleep it is.

Poor teabagger.......................
Asleep, as usual.

§2383. Rebellion or insurrection​

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

10 YEARS.

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

20 YEARS.

 

[jc456]

Poor teabagger.......................
Asleep, as usual.

§2383. Rebellion or insurrection​

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

10 YEARS.

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

20 YEARS.

Laying Down The Law On “Sedition” vs. “Treason” vs. “Insurrection” vs. “Coup” | Dictionary.com

On January 6, 2021, interest in the words insurrection, sedition, treason, and coup all surged on on Dictionary.com after a mob of supporters of Donald Trump stormed the US Capitol building on the day Congress was set to certify the electoral vote count to confirm Joe Biden’s presidential...

www.dictionary.com

​

Legal definition of sedition​

United States law provides specific information on the crime of sedition. Section 2384 of Chapter 115 in Title 18 of the United States Code (which lays out federal crimes and criminal procedures) defines the crime of seditious conspiracy and Section 2385, advocating overthrow of the government.

According to Section 2384, a person can be fined or imprisoned for conspiring to overthrow or oppose the government by force, prevent or delay its laws by force, or take by force its property. Section 2385 makes it a crime—punishable by fines, imprisonment, and/or being barred from federal employment—to engage in such actions as advocating, abetting, advising, or teaching anything that encourages using force to destroy or overthrow the government, including distributing materials or organizing groups to these ends.

Legal definition of insurrection​

Title 18 of the US Code (Section 2383 in Chapter 115) also sets out the crime and penalty for insurrection:

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

 

[Mashmont]

"The wicked become ensnared in their own traps" - Proverbs: 5:22

This describes perfectly what is happening to the Democrats. They launched witch hunt after witch hunt on the great man, trying to keep him from running, trying to tamp down his popularity, they thought they outsmarted him into an early debate with all the rules favoring them, and then it all falls in on them. Now look who is the prohibitive favorite to win in November.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Yes, they do.
There is a difference between protesting, rioting and inciting violence.

That would be YOU, you're cult and your dear leader.

I wonder if you'll remember your own words after the election

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I wonder if you'll remember your own words after the election

Yeah, it's pretty definitive.
Protest.
Riot.

 

[Faun]

1. The letter was addressed to SECDEF Miller, advising him that the DC police were adequate.

2. Capitol Police Chief Sund's early request for the NG was denied by Sgt at Arms Irving based on Pelosi's direction.

3. At that time the Trump WH was told that requests for the NG had to come from Pelosi or Bowser. Trump did not nationalize the NG as if there was a national emergency. Normally the NG are under the state governor's control unless there is a national emergency.

4. Pelosi's video nails it down, doesn't it?

None of that indicates Trump message was conveyed to any of them. Trump told Miller 10000 troops would be needed. And he meant that in terms of protecting his people, not the Capitol. Miller didn't act on that because he didn't think Trump was serious. And Miller reported directly to the Secretary of Defense who was authorized to call up the DCNG.

As far as Pelosi, she did not have the authority to call up the DCNG. The Capitol Police Board could have and she could have asked the House Sergeant-at-arms to vote to call them up. But it still would have required McConnell to do the same. Interestingly enough, righties don't blame him, they only blame Pelosi.