FDR_Reagan
Platinum Member
- Nov 20, 2023
- 3,714
- 2,131
- 938
My tnoughts?
When is feeding Gazans not OK.
This propaganda really started by Netanayahu's political foes. Then it was copied into liberal media, then it went expanded exaggeration into full fantasy.
%%%
From Feeding the Hungry to Fueling Falsehoods: Twisting Netanyahu’s Gaza Policy After Oct 7.
Netanyahu’s goal was never to help Hamas—it was to help Gazans and protect Israeli lives.
For years, Prime Minister Netanyahu pursued a policy aimed at providing humanitarian aid and employment opportunities for Gazans. The goal was twofold: to alleviate the suffering of the general population and to maintain relative calm by giving Hamas fewer excuses to ignite violence. And for a time, it worked.
But that fragile stability was shattered on October 7, when Hamas launched a brutal and unprecedented attack on Israeli civilians—exposing just how cynically they had exploited Israel's goodwill. The same policies once hailed as efforts to "feed the hungry" are now being twisted by Netanyahu’s critics into accusations that he was “empowering Hamas.”
The irony is hard to miss: when Israel offered aid, it was condemned for being too generous. Now, as it takes steps to ensure that no assistance reaches Hamas leaders, it is accused of "starving the population." It seems some voices will twist any policy—no matter how well-intentioned—to serve their political narratives.
From here.
____
How the UN’s Famine Authority Engaged in Data Fraud to Undermine U.S. Humanitarian Aid.
A Famine of Facts: UN declaration distorts reality with bad science, analysis finds
By Network Contagion Research Institute
Aug 27, 2025 DailyWire.com
www.dailywire.com
XJay Engelmayer:
The UN’s Blue Flag, Hamas’s Black Hand: A Case Study in Complicity.
The UN’s Three-Part Mantra of Excuses
1 Humanitarian Necessity – UNRWA claims it is the “only game in town.” But humanitarian aid isn’t just bread and water, it has included cement, wiring, and infrastructure that repeatedly ends up in Hamas’s tunnels. The UN knows it, yet refuses to answer the obvious: where did all that concrete go? There is even little to no oversight or accounting regarding the projects all the cement, wires and infrastructure was slated for from the beginning. How many schools or health facilities were never developed because the supplies were designated to construct Hamas's underground world?
2 Institutional Separation – UNRWA insists its staff are “civilians.” Yet OIOS admits some were terrorists, and polls show the majority of Palestinians in Gaza as well as Judea and Samaria support Hamas. The idea that UNRWA employees are immune from these sympathies is absurd. Teaching jihad in classrooms, wiring electricity from UNRWA buildings to Hamas tunnels, turning blind eyes to tunnel entrances hidden inside compounds, this is complicity, not neutrality.
3 Process Over Outcomes – When scandals erupt, the UN launches reviews, frameworks, reforms. Endless paper. But the system never changes, because the bureaucracy exists to protect itself, not reform itself. Reviews become fig leaves for corruption.
Donors: Suspend, Resume, Repeat
When Israel exposed the October 7 connection, donors briefly froze funding. Then, predictably, they resumed. The EU returned to business as usual. Only the U.S. codified its funding halt into law until at least March 2026. Donor governments know UNRWA is compromised, yet they cling to it out of habit and fear of logistical headaches.
What Honest Neutrality Would Look Like
True neutrality would demand:
The Moral Bottom Line
Neutrality does not mean parroting terrorists. It does not mean rockets in schools, tunnels under headquarters, or staff participating in massacres. It does not mean reviewing the problem to death while feeding the same beast year after year.
Until the UN stops outsourcing truth to Hamas ministries and proves it can police its own payroll, Western governments must stop pretending this setup produces neutral information. It doesn’t.
It produces propaganda wrapped in a blue flag.
The only immediate solution, one that will save billions in taxpayer funds, is simple: Defund the United Nations!
Aug 27, 2025.
When is feeding Gazans not OK.
This propaganda really started by Netanayahu's political foes. Then it was copied into liberal media, then it went expanded exaggeration into full fantasy.
%%%
From Feeding the Hungry to Fueling Falsehoods: Twisting Netanyahu’s Gaza Policy After Oct 7.
Netanyahu’s goal was never to help Hamas—it was to help Gazans and protect Israeli lives.
For years, Prime Minister Netanyahu pursued a policy aimed at providing humanitarian aid and employment opportunities for Gazans. The goal was twofold: to alleviate the suffering of the general population and to maintain relative calm by giving Hamas fewer excuses to ignite violence. And for a time, it worked.
But that fragile stability was shattered on October 7, when Hamas launched a brutal and unprecedented attack on Israeli civilians—exposing just how cynically they had exploited Israel's goodwill. The same policies once hailed as efforts to "feed the hungry" are now being twisted by Netanyahu’s critics into accusations that he was “empowering Hamas.”
The irony is hard to miss: when Israel offered aid, it was condemned for being too generous. Now, as it takes steps to ensure that no assistance reaches Hamas leaders, it is accused of "starving the population." It seems some voices will twist any policy—no matter how well-intentioned—to serve their political narratives.
From here.
____
How the UN’s Famine Authority Engaged in Data Fraud to Undermine U.S. Humanitarian Aid.
A Famine of Facts: UN declaration distorts reality with bad science, analysis finds
By Network Contagion Research Institute
Aug 27, 2025 DailyWire.com
How the UN’s Famine Authority Engaged in Data Fraud to Undermine U.S. Humanitarian Aid
On August 22, the United Nations declared that famine was “currently occurring” in Gaza City. Within hours the claim drove headlines, advocacy, and legal filings.All of it based on flawed science. A forensic review of the data by our team at the Network Contagion Research Institute found that...
XJay Engelmayer:
The UN’s Blue Flag, Hamas’s Black Hand: A Case Study in Complicity.
The UN’s Three-Part Mantra of Excuses
1 Humanitarian Necessity – UNRWA claims it is the “only game in town.” But humanitarian aid isn’t just bread and water, it has included cement, wiring, and infrastructure that repeatedly ends up in Hamas’s tunnels. The UN knows it, yet refuses to answer the obvious: where did all that concrete go? There is even little to no oversight or accounting regarding the projects all the cement, wires and infrastructure was slated for from the beginning. How many schools or health facilities were never developed because the supplies were designated to construct Hamas's underground world?
2 Institutional Separation – UNRWA insists its staff are “civilians.” Yet OIOS admits some were terrorists, and polls show the majority of Palestinians in Gaza as well as Judea and Samaria support Hamas. The idea that UNRWA employees are immune from these sympathies is absurd. Teaching jihad in classrooms, wiring electricity from UNRWA buildings to Hamas tunnels, turning blind eyes to tunnel entrances hidden inside compounds, this is complicity, not neutrality.
3 Process Over Outcomes – When scandals erupt, the UN launches reviews, frameworks, reforms. Endless paper. But the system never changes, because the bureaucracy exists to protect itself, not reform itself. Reviews become fig leaves for corruption.
Donors: Suspend, Resume, Repeat
When Israel exposed the October 7 connection, donors briefly froze funding. Then, predictably, they resumed. The EU returned to business as usual. Only the U.S. codified its funding halt into law until at least March 2026. Donor governments know UNRWA is compromised, yet they cling to it out of habit and fear of logistical headaches.
What Honest Neutrality Would Look Like
True neutrality would demand:
- Full Transparency – Line-by-line staff records, affiliations, and vetting against terror lists, continuously audited.
- Independent Verification – If a statistic comes from Hamas ministries, it should be labeled “unverified,” not “UN-confirmed.”
- Operational Redesign – Break UNRWA’s monopoly. Fund private or independent alternatives like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (@GHFUpdates), which has proven aid can reach civilians without Hamas skimming off the top.
The Moral Bottom Line
Neutrality does not mean parroting terrorists. It does not mean rockets in schools, tunnels under headquarters, or staff participating in massacres. It does not mean reviewing the problem to death while feeding the same beast year after year.
Until the UN stops outsourcing truth to Hamas ministries and proves it can police its own payroll, Western governments must stop pretending this setup produces neutral information. It doesn’t.
It produces propaganda wrapped in a blue flag.
The only immediate solution, one that will save billions in taxpayer funds, is simple: Defund the United Nations!
Aug 27, 2025.
Last edited:
