Does it matter in the grand scheme of things on whether WBC travels or whether Stat has personal knowledge of their filth?
Seems you have an issue and it has nothing to do with phelps at all, gatsby.
Shame on you for twisting to where its AOK because Stat supposedly is lying. It shouldn't even be about that at all! You are showing some ignorance here, bubba. Not Stat.
Uh__ check the thread, gracie, and you'll see that stat attempted to throw the first 'personal' stone when he said this (reference:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...-hates-fags-church-dying-5.html#post8784593):
But you are a most outstanding playtoy. Carry on. I shall enjoy batting you around some.
Wait a minute. A couple of months ago you got all pouty, took your little ball and marched straight home, said you had me on ignore. Guess your ignore function is broke, what?
Clearly, we're talking about a juvenile poster who gets off on taunting other posters about matters not even related to the subject. You gonna give him the shame on speech for making it personal? You were there, and you didn't say anything then, HYPOCRITE.
Stat's like an eleven-year-old juvenile who says a bunch of awkward, immature crap and then later tells tales (when it's convenient) and then expects people to believe him. Well, you can. I don't, period. He was the OP. I have very little doubt that stat the attention whore would have mentioned that he knew the families of military families taunted then if that were the case. He didn't mention it because it was 'too deeply personal. Give me a freaking break. He didn't because that is simply not the case.
And if you go back and look, he only brought it up in a coy way like a ******* juvenilie boy 'uh how do you know I don't families of the dead soldiers'. Uh, cos you don't asshole. 'Yuh huh, so there.' Give me a ******* break, gracie. Use your ******* brain. He's a little boy who lies when it's convenient. I don't give two shits if you call that personal or not. I called him out on his BS, and I'm fine with it.