Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad Read

[AmericanFirst1]

Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He wants you evangelicals to boycott such corporations who support LGBT. The far right social con Christian reactionaries are going to find out just how irrelevant they are truly.

You cannot be the Morality Police anymore.

Run along.

Good for Mr Graham. Who would you have as the morality police, gays? LMAO. This country is becoming a cesspool because of the left and the gays.

 

[bodecea]

Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He wants you evangelicals to boycott such corporations who support LGBT. The far right social con Christian reactionaries are going to find out just how irrelevant they are truly.

You cannot be the Morality Police anymore.

Run along.

Was this before or after his daddy finally took Mormons off his "evil list"?

 

[pismoe]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

that's good thing Roshawn , might happen , hope that it does !!

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

That mom&pop bank will probably only have assets equal to a Chik-Fil-A too. It is highly unlikely that any well known national bank will take the reputational risk.

Chick fil a is a chain and it's worked for them from the outset.

 

[martybegan]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

That mom&pop bank will probably only have assets equal to a Chik-Fil-A too. It is highly unlikely that any well known national bank will take the reputational risk.

There is one one chik-fil-a, they are not franchises. I doubt a bank with a net worth of $5.5 billion can be considered "mom and pop"

 

[bodecea]

Where are all the nuts who railed against GLAAD et al for wanting a boycott of A&E over the Duck Dynasty business.

I guess boycotts are back on the RWnut menu...

They never worked for them....they have boycotted Disney...*chuckle....Coke...*snicker....J.C. Penneys...*titter...and Pepsi...*chortle.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Where are all the nuts who railed against GLAAD et al for wanting a boycott of A&E over the Duck Dynasty business.

I guess boycotts are back on the RWnut menu...

Glaad is bad Graham is good.

 

[bodecea]

Watch this boycott sink like a stone.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.

He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

Once again you revel in attacking the livelihood of people who disagree with you. A pox on you, and your ilk.

I was expanding on the point made in the article which is perfectly valid.

Banks are risk averse and reputational risk is something banks take very seriously.

That you don't understand this concept is your problem.

I understand it fine, you are a petty miserable person that wants to punish people who disagree with you. That you want people to have NO options for banking due to their political beliefs shows how terrible of a human being you really are.

You are very confused!

Graham is nefariously trying to instigate a boycott against a major national bank based upon nothing but his ugly bigotry but in your warped and perverted mind the person who is pointing out that national banks are risk averse is a "terrible" "human being"?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

According to Bill Maher there are still enough Christians out there to make an anti-homofascist bank feasible.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

It's his money. He can bank wherever he damn well pleases.

As opposed to God's?

God wouldn't want his money there either.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

That mom&pop bank will probably only have assets equal to a Chik-Fil-A too. It is highly unlikely that any well known national bank will take the reputational risk.

Chick fil a is a chain and it's worked for them from the outset.

They are not a bank and you obviously don't have a clue how banks operate.

 

[Blackrook]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.

He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

Once again you revel in attacking the livelihood of people who disagree with you. A pox on you, and your ilk.

I was expanding on the point made in the article which is perfectly valid.

Banks are risk averse and reputational risk is something banks take very seriously.

That you don't understand this concept is your problem.

Yes, we know that you and your batallions of screaming faeries are going to wreak vengeance on any business that does not surrender to your agenda.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.

He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

Once again you revel in attacking the livelihood of people who disagree with you. A pox on you, and your ilk.

I was expanding on the point made in the article which is perfectly valid.

Banks are risk averse and reputational risk is something banks take very seriously.

That you don't understand this concept is your problem.

I understand it fine, you are a petty miserable person that wants to punish people who disagree with you. That you want people to have NO options for banking due to their political beliefs shows how terrible of a human being you really are.

You are very confused!

Graham is nefariously trying to instigate a boycott against a major national bank based upon nothing but his ugly bigotry but in your warped and perverted mind the person who is pointing out that national banks are risk averse is a "terrible" "human being"?

Your ugly bigotry is for others a principled stand against homofascism.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.

He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

Once again you revel in attacking the livelihood of people who disagree with you. A pox on you, and your ilk.

I was expanding on the point made in the article which is perfectly valid.

Banks are risk averse and reputational risk is something banks take very seriously.

That you don't understand this concept is your problem.

I understand it fine, you are a petty miserable person that wants to punish people who disagree with you. That you want people to have NO options for banking due to their political beliefs shows how terrible of a human being you really are.

You are very confused!

Graham is nefariously trying to instigate a boycott against a major national bank based upon nothing but his ugly bigotry but in your warped and perverted mind the person who is pointing out that national banks are risk averse is a "terrible" "human being"?

No bigotry there, just truth. Good for Mr. Graham.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

That mom&pop bank will probably only have assets equal to a Chik-Fil-A too. It is highly unlikely that any well known national bank will take the reputational risk.

Chick fil a is a chain and it's worked for them from the outset.

They are not a bank and you obviously don't have a clue how banks operate.

A bank is a business and a restaurant is a business.

 

[martybegan]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.

He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

Once again you revel in attacking the livelihood of people who disagree with you. A pox on you, and your ilk.

I was expanding on the point made in the article which is perfectly valid.

Banks are risk averse and reputational risk is something banks take very seriously.

That you don't understand this concept is your problem.

I understand it fine, you are a petty miserable person that wants to punish people who disagree with you. That you want people to have NO options for banking due to their political beliefs shows how terrible of a human being you really are.

You are very confused!

Graham is nefariously trying to instigate a boycott against a major national bank based upon nothing but his ugly bigotry but in your warped and perverted mind the person who is pointing out that national banks are risk averse is a "terrible" "human being"?

But he isn't calling for people who keep their money in said banks to be shunned. And if you truly think SSM approval is so high, small amounts of $$ coming out of Wells Fargo won't hurt them.

He is taking a position and making it public. YOU are the one who said he should be ruined by being unable to bank because of it.

 

[Katzndogz]

The idea that only the left can boycott is ridiculous. I'd rather know about local businesses so I know where to shop locally.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Last time I checked Chick-Fil-A and Hobby Lobby are better business models than any gay bars.
Banks can't afford to become pro-homo niche-oriented if it dissuades business. It's best for them to remain silent on the issue. Wells Fargo just shot themselves in the foot.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Banks would usually line up for those kinds of deposits. But Ken Thomas, a Miami-based independent bank consultant and economist, said the bank that receives Graham’s bank accounts will have to answer some tough questions.

“The bank that takes this account will be in a higher visibility position because you’re going to ask them, ‘What do you think of that ad?’ … And they will face some potential reputation risk.”

Banks, Thomas said, “don’t like controversy, and they don’t like reputation risk.”

Whichever bank receives these accounts will have to combat the perception that they stand counter to the ideals of Wells Fargo.

“To take your money out of one of the best-run banks in America, and for another bank to accept an account that came out of Wells Fargo, some people might ask questions like, ‘Does your bank not agree with Wells Fargo?’” Thomas said.


Read more here: Franklin Graham is pulling bank accounts from Wells Fargo for featuring same-sex couple in ad The Charlotte Observer The Charlotte Observer

He is going to have a hard time finding a major national bank willing to assume the reputational risk that he brings with that account.

None of them will want to be associated with anti-LBGT bigotry.
He is probably going to have to put the funds in some mom&pop bank somewhere and they won't have the resources to handle that kind of deposit.

What a fool!

On the contrary. He may expose a bank with the values of a Chick-Fil-a and that would enhance their business.

That mom&pop bank will probably only have assets equal to a Chik-Fil-A too. It is highly unlikely that any well known national bank will take the reputational risk.

There is one one chik-fil-a, they are not franchises. I doubt a bank with a net worth of $5.5 billion can be considered "mom and pop"

Deposits are liabilities to banks. Loans are assets. Only 28 banks, out of 5,570, in the nation have assets in excess of $5 billion.

None of those 28 banks will be willing to take on the reputational risk associated with the LBGT animus that is associated with the Graham deposits. That just leaves the 5,542 mom&pop banks who will struggle with the FDIC insurance involved with a deposit of that magnitude.