Very true.Such garbage as usual.The next reading will be from a parked Puegoet sitting in the sun at Charles de Gaulle airport
My daughter and friends are in France.
It's hot
Look where it was measured if you can figure out where the Mediterranean is.
Ah well Irish, no dogs, blacks or Irish in London apt Windows
"A great people ruined by drink"
You're a goofy loon
Takes one to know one!
Omg 1.9?Thank you Billy Bob, about time some ne knew what the fuck they were talking about. So what you are saying is thAt do to increased amount of ashalt which stores and then radiates heat constantly for long periods of time these weather stations readings are thrown off as compared to lets say the 1930's. Seeing how concrete and asphalt are need for ingress and egress for your poroperty, how far would you say the nearest asphalt or concrete is from where you live Billy Bob?This is a very basic concept. The mass of the parking lot is BLACK, which absorbs more energy from the sun creating a higher temperature above it. Thermometers in close proximity develop what is called "sensor bias" because the near area air temperature is artificially increased by the asphalts warming of it.Explain the science behind asphalt then. Put up or shut up.Finally figure the rabbit whole you were going down and decide to shut up?
Who shut up ?
The main problem of the HCN (Historical Climate Network) is due to changes around many of the sensor sites where data is collected. This is known by scientists as the Urban Heat Island Effect or UHI. This develops around cities where most of our climatic stations are located. This is the reason US-CRN was created. to remove this artificial, man made-land use change, bias from the data.
We know, by empirical experiment, if there are enough sensors affected the combined aggregate temperature will be artificially raised.
Land use change is the primary reason that the HCN is no longer a reliable source for climate monitoring. The problems in France show that it is a global problem, in poor site control and care. The one in the OP overstated the warming by 1.9 deg C compared to 5 other privately owned and cared for weather stations within one mile of it. Even two of the French Meteorological sites (within 5 miles) show the temperature was overstated.
The evidence is clear that this is a case of sever station change bias.
It was actually quite cool