If it were a legitimate committee, instead of a STAR CHAMBER? Maybe folks would take it seriously.
Seven Democrats and two Republicans all appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. And even the Republicans are hostile and prejudiced to the accused, from the outset .. . . total bullshit.
They won't ask questions of the Capitol Police, or the D.C. mayor, or Nancy Pelosi. Nor will they be showing the public the hundreds of hours of unreleased Capitol film footage. It is a political sham, a partisan hit job, with a predetermined conclusion. . . they are just looking for evidence to fit a predetermined narrative. It isn't a REAL search for truth.
In the olden days? They used to call these STAR CHAMBERS. A person would have to be dope to waste their time watching any of it.
". . . The Star Chamber was originally established to ensure the fair enforcement of laws against socially and politically prominent people sufficiently powerful that ordinary courts might hesitate to convict them of their crimes. However, it became synonymous with social and political oppression through the arbitrary use and abuse of the power it wielded.
In modern times, legal or administrative bodies with strict, arbitrary rulings, no "due process" rights to those accused, and secretive proceedings are sometimes called "star chambers" as a metaphor."
en.wikipedia.org