Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ah the old laughable popular mechanics source AGAIN you coincidence theorists always retreat to try and win an argument when your losing.the warren commission report of the kennedy assassination.this always goes ignored, but here goes again for the hundreth time- read david ray griffiths book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING.an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.He interviews demolition experts in that book that prove popular mechanics is a fairy tale.
Ad hominem attack, again. You deflect the issue, again.
Popular Mechanics merely recited what the Lamont Lab at NYU concluded on 9/11 - that the seismic graphs showed a wave pattern inconsistent with an explosion.
The conspiracists' irrationality has gotten such that they would deny that the earth revolved around the sun if Popular Mechanics said so.
so, now we add implosion world and protec to the members of this conspiracyno its the Truth the Hearst owned dictionary definition of yellow journalism .. popular mechanics and their co-horts implosion world and protec..have clearly been chosen to be the governments disinformation agents..there is no peer review or power of subpeona..it is a joke..
Please Take Notice That:
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
Sign the Petition
so, now we add implosion world and protec to the members of this conspiracy
oh, i was added YEARS agoAnd you too, DiveCon!
David L. Griscom, PhD Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.
Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories], and 7 were brought down by explosives. [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]
... I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who may have the time, expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the World Trade Center collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals like, say, the Journal of Applied Physics.
The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215).
Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman
Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks."
Bio: David L Griscom PhD Physicist bio
Dwain Deets, MS Eng
Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 500 Architects and Engineers:
"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition
Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.
Bio: NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center
no its the Truth the Hearst owned dictionary definition of yellow journalism .. popular mechanics and their co-horts implosion world and protec..have clearly been chosen to be the governments disinformation agents..there is no peer review or power of subpeona..it is a joke..
Please Take Notice That:
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
Sign the Petition
yeah, you troofers do a lot of thatyellow journalism
Inflammatory, irresponsible reporting by newspapers. The phrase arose during the 1890s, when some American newspapers, particularly those run by William Randolph Hearst, worked to incite hatred of Spain, thereby contributing to the start of the Spanish-American War. Newspapers that practice yellow journalism are called yellow press.
yellow journalism definition | Dictionary.com
First of all there are over two million engineers and over a hundred thousand architects in this nation alone. (How Large is the U.S. S&E Workforce?, Architects, Except Landscape and Naval) Only five hundred in the world signed that petition. Secondly, from the link you provided it does NOT say that all of those people believe 9/11 was an inside job. It says that they doubt the official story and want a new investigation, but nowhere does it say they believe it was an inside job. I believe that they phrased it the way they did in order to gain more signatures. There are many reasons why they would want a new investigation, it doesnt have to mean they believe it is a hoax. Lastly, as I proved in post number 260 of this thread, there are many experts that believe me. Again, this website ranks the top engineers schools in the world and I have engineering professors from every school in the top five. 10 World's Top Engineering Universities 2007 | SKORCAREER
, and is hereby created to conduct a comprehensive, factdriven investigation into the events that took place on 9/11, as well as to thoroughly examine related events before and after the attacks, including any activities attempting to hide, cover up, impede or obstruct any investigation into these 9/11 events, following wherever the facts may lead. The Commission shall publish one or more reports of their findings." i have no kingyellow journalism was a term coined for your king ..Hearst.. publisher of popular mechanics... your getting confused again
so how many astronauts that have walked on the moon are there
how many tac directors of NORAD ?..how many NASA research directors..how many heads of the depleted uranium program,how many top gun flight instructors
yellow journalism
Inflammatory, irresponsible reporting by newspapers. The phrase arose during the 1890s, when some American newspapers, particularly those run by William Randolph Hearst, worked to incite hatred of Spain, thereby contributing to the start of the Spanish-American War. Newspapers that practice yellow journalism are called yellow press.
yellow journalism definition | Dictionary.com
see what i have been telling youAre you criticizing me on this? That is amazingly hypocritical of you. Yellow journalism of course means to distort the news. You claim that the sixth person who walked on the moon agrees with you when he NEVER said that 9/11 is an inside job. He wants a new 9/11 investigation but that doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. Again, maybe he believes there was information that out govt could have known to stop the attacks beforehand. It doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. That is a clear case of yellow journalism.
I am saying that 60+ engineering experts from around the globe approved an article stating how the planes caused the WTC buildings to fall. This obviously proves it couldn't have been done by explosives planted by the govt. This is not yellow journalism, this is fact.
Are you criticizing me on this? That is amazingly hypocritical of you. Yellow journalism of course means to distort the news. You claim that the sixth person who walked on the moon agrees with you when he NEVER said that 9/11 is an inside job. He wants a new 9/11 investigation but that doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. Again, maybe he believes there was information that out govt could have known to stop the attacks beforehand. It doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. That is a clear case of yellow journalism.
Are you criticizing me on this? That is amazingly hypocritical of you. Yellow journalism of course means to distort the news. You claim that the sixth person who walked on the moon agrees with you when he NEVER said that 9/11 is an inside job. He wants a new 9/11 investigation but that doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. Again, maybe he believes there was information that out govt could have known to stop the attacks beforehand. It doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job. That is a clear case of yellow journalism.
I am saying that 60+ engineering experts from around the globe approved an article stating how the planes caused the WTC buildings to fall. This obviously proves it couldn't have been done by explosives planted by the govt. This is not yellow journalism, this is fact.
I have not misrepresented anyone nor has the patriots web site Mitchel has signed a petition and is proposed as the chairmen of a real investigation the petition also calls for considering explosives may have been used and many of those that have signed the petition are already of the belief and state an inside job
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 500 Architects and Engineers:
"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7."
Youtube
Tuesday, Dec 30, 2008
9/11 Truth responds to NIST with HARD FACTS & Evidence!
NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!
YouTube - NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!
