Fox News makes Obama Cry

[Wicked Jester]

I am a he, so you/it won't have to type so many words...

I am not bashing our soldiers, they're HUMAN, they react no different than any other soldiers from ANY other country in any other war...

I'm bashing WAR... however you want to spin it, deny it or ignore it, WE...the United States of America brought the plague of WAR to the people of Iraq...thousands of innocent human beings no longer exist for ONE reason...America...

When you face your creator and he asks why you didn't speak out against the killing of what He created in His image, saying you were a "patriot" or an "American" won't cut it...

Seriously, you're a freakin whackjob!

Do you not remember the entire country of Iraq out celebrating when they finally realized that Sadaam was finished?

Sadaam spent years playing games. Spent years rattling his sabre. Spent years living a lie. Spent years killing and torturing his own people. He could have avoided it all. He chose to play games. Chose to give the impression that he had those weapons. Chose not to deny a relationship with Bin Laden. This is fully proven by his own words. Enough was enough. It was time to take his sabre and shove it firmly up his ass once and for all.

You can bash WAR until the cows come home. It makes no freakin' difference what you think. Humans have been at war as long as they have existed. It's a fact of life that will NEVER change.

Fact is, you can sit there with dreams of rainbows, unicorns, peace signs, tie dyed shirts, bongs and roach clips, but you will never see a world that is in line with your loony vision of reality. Fact is, Obama doesn't fart rose scented fairy dust, or shit ribbons of rainbows as you loony libs so desperately want to believe. He egg farts, and spews foul streams of shit JUST LIKE YOU!. And yes, like ALL HUMANS, he has a very violent side. It's human nature. You too have a very violent side, you're just too caught up in your loony liberal dreams to admit it.

Now, your beloved Messiah has no choice but to commit more troops. Therefore, he becomes one in the same. Those troops will no doubt unleash violence on a massive scale, and RIGHTFULLY so. People are going to die very violent and grotesque deaths. That is what happens in WAR. So, are you STILL going to support your beloved Messiah?

After all, he's the commander in chief sending soldiers off to do very violent things. Like I said, it makes him one in the same as those troops he's sending off to go commit mass slaughter on our enemies, and yes, innocents will die. It's inevitable.

Thank you for PROVING the one universal FACT that has existed ever since man first walked upright...Liberals believe people are basically good, conservatives believe people are basically evil...it explains everything they do and everything they believe...

What I find most enlightening...ALL beliefs we hold as absolute truths about mankind are deeply rooted in self, NOT others...


Liberalism is trust of the people, tempered by prudence; conservatism, distrust of people, tempered by fear.
William E. Gladstone

Lets see,

A liberal Marxist blew JFK's head off.

Manson was a liberal to the core.

Mansons followers were liberals to the core.

Two liberals, on seperate occasions, tried to Kill Gerald Ford.

A liberal killed John Lennon.

A lovesick liberal tried to kill the great Ronald Reagan.

Yeah, we sure can trust you liberals and your "prudence" alright!

LMAO!

Now, if you're so against WAR. Why isn't your hypocritical ass out protesting the 444 soldiers that have been lost in Afghanistan since your LIBERAL messiah took office?

I mean hell, that's over 100 more lost in Afghanistan in just 9 months, then Bush lost in Afghanistan during his entire 7 years as wartime commander CIC.

444 lost in Afghanistan under Obama.

389 lost in Afghanistan under Bush.

Where's your outrage, nutjob?

 

[drsmith1072]

Spin and attack that's all the righties have. They demand a link for something that is common knowledge while they avoid providing proof of their own claims and try to attack the messenger in the apparent belief that to do so discredits the message.

Fact is cavuto knew that wasn't the real number and even gave his own GUESS of 5,000 before hand and then when he went to air he tried to talk it up to 15,000 and that is dishonest. The fact that you foxnews koolaid drinkers defend this bs shows that you have zero integrity.

Oh and what about when foxnews has listed embarassed republicans as dems?? They have done that in the past and in fact did so with SC governor mark sanford. So what spin are you going to offer to defend that??

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

Go back and read a bit. I see righties demanding a link and then when they get it they try to attack it and the messenger and yet I have seen many many posts from righties making assertions and not providing any proof. Why is that??

BTW what did I spin? Got any specifics?? Didn't think so. I asked a legitmate question about how foxnews dishonestly listed mark sanford as a democrat and you avoid it to attack the messenger. Imagine that.

What messenger did I attack?? Hmm? I will probably be waiting for a while for an actual answer to that question.

Oh and if you want a perfect example of projecting please look to your own post and realize how it describes your own post perfectly. LOL You spin to avoid a question that you don't want to answer, attack the messenger and then project your own shortcomings onto the messenger. LOL

 

[Bfgrn]

Spin and attack that's all the righties have. They demand a link for something that is common knowledge while they avoid providing proof of their own claims and try to attack the messenger in the apparent belief that to do so discredits the message.

Fact is cavuto knew that wasn't the real number and even gave his own GUESS of 5,000 before hand and then when he went to air he tried to talk it up to 15,000 and that is dishonest. The fact that you foxnews koolaid drinkers defend this bs shows that you have zero integrity.

Oh and what about when foxnews has listed embarassed republicans as dems?? They have done that in the past and in fact did so with SC governor mark sanford. So what spin are you going to offer to defend that??

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Spin and attack that's all the righties have. They demand a link for something that is common knowledge while they avoid providing proof of their own claims and try to attack the messenger in the apparent belief that to do so discredits the message.

Fact is cavuto knew that wasn't the real number and even gave his own GUESS of 5,000 before hand and then when he went to air he tried to talk it up to 15,000 and that is dishonest. The fact that you foxnews koolaid drinkers defend this bs shows that you have zero integrity.

Oh and what about when foxnews has listed embarassed republicans as dems?? They have done that in the past and in fact did so with SC governor mark sanford. So what spin are you going to offer to defend that??

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

 

[Oddball]

Spin and attack that's all the righties have. They demand a link for something that is common knowledge while they avoid providing proof of their own claims and try to attack the messenger in the apparent belief that to do so discredits the message.

Fact is cavuto knew that wasn't the real number and even gave his own GUESS of 5,000 before hand and then when he went to air he tried to talk it up to 15,000 and that is dishonest. The fact that you foxnews koolaid drinkers defend this bs shows that you have zero integrity.

Oh and what about when foxnews has listed embarassed republicans as dems?? They have done that in the past and in fact did so with SC governor mark sanford. So what spin are you going to offer to defend that??

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

You forgot to say "pea brain", Jethro.

 

[drsmith1072]

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

 

[Oddball]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

Yet we're still waiting for the link that proves Cavuto willfully lied.

Isn't deflection fun?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

 

[Bfgrn]

Seriously, you're a freakin whackjob!

Do you not remember the entire country of Iraq out celebrating when they finally realized that Sadaam was finished?

Sadaam spent years playing games. Spent years rattling his sabre. Spent years living a lie. Spent years killing and torturing his own people. He could have avoided it all. He chose to play games. Chose to give the impression that he had those weapons. Chose not to deny a relationship with Bin Laden. This is fully proven by his own words. Enough was enough. It was time to take his sabre and shove it firmly up his ass once and for all.

You can bash WAR until the cows come home. It makes no freakin' difference what you think. Humans have been at war as long as they have existed. It's a fact of life that will NEVER change.

Fact is, you can sit there with dreams of rainbows, unicorns, peace signs, tie dyed shirts, bongs and roach clips, but you will never see a world that is in line with your loony vision of reality. Fact is, Obama doesn't fart rose scented fairy dust, or shit ribbons of rainbows as you loony libs so desperately want to believe. He egg farts, and spews foul streams of shit JUST LIKE YOU!. And yes, like ALL HUMANS, he has a very violent side. It's human nature. You too have a very violent side, you're just too caught up in your loony liberal dreams to admit it.

Now, your beloved Messiah has no choice but to commit more troops. Therefore, he becomes one in the same. Those troops will no doubt unleash violence on a massive scale, and RIGHTFULLY so. People are going to die very violent and grotesque deaths. That is what happens in WAR. So, are you STILL going to support your beloved Messiah?

After all, he's the commander in chief sending soldiers off to do very violent things. Like I said, it makes him one in the same as those troops he's sending off to go commit mass slaughter on our enemies, and yes, innocents will die. It's inevitable.

Thank you for PROVING the one universal FACT that has existed ever since man first walked upright...Liberals believe people are basically good, conservatives believe people are basically evil...it explains everything they do and everything they believe...

What I find most enlightening...ALL beliefs we hold as absolute truths about mankind are deeply rooted in self, NOT others...


Liberalism is trust of the people, tempered by prudence; conservatism, distrust of people, tempered by fear.
William E. Gladstone

Lets see,

A liberal Marxist blew JFK's head off.

Manson was a liberal to the core.

Mansons followers were liberals to the core.

Two liberals, on seperate occasions, tried to Kill Gerald Ford.

A liberal killed John Lennon.

A lovesick liberal tried to kill the great Ronald Reagan.

Yeah, we sure can trust you liberals and your "prudence" alright!

LMAO!

Now, if you're so against WAR. Why isn't your hypocritical ass out protesting the 444 soldiers that have been lost in Afghanistan since your LIBERAL messiah took office?

I mean hell, that's over 100 more lost in Afghanistan in just 9 months, then Bush lost in Afghanistan during his entire 7 years as wartime commander CIC.

444 lost in Afghanistan under Obama.

389 lost in Afghanistan under Bush.

Where's your outrage, nutjob?

Is this some attempt on your part at intelligence?

If you want to go over the physical, medical and forensic evidence of the John F. Kennedy assassination, I'd love to twist your tiny pea into a pretzel...

Charles Manson, you mean the person born no name Maddox?

Most criminal type personalities from Hitler to Manson share a common bond...a childhood devoid of any love and nurturing and one filled with plenty of punishment and violence...

So pea brain, what is the main criticism of the way liberals raise their children by you right wing conformists?

BTW, I supported Bush and our effort after 9/11 to go after bin Laden and al Qaeda...BUT, I was totally against invading Iraq...

I now support our current president's honest effort to evaluate our situation in Afghanistan. I want him to weigh the terrible cost in blood and treasure against the very real possibility that the situation there has become untenable...MAINLY due to the failed efforts of the previous administration, their neglect of that theater and their obsession with Iraq...

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

Yet we're still waiting for the link that proves Cavuto willfully lied.

Isn't deflection fun?

They would rather deflect by attacking the individuals posting instead of the topic.

 

[Bfgrn]

So, all you can do is spin, attack the messenger and avoid providing any proof....And, of course, project.

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

And how is yours to me different?

 

[drsmith1072]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

Yet we're still waiting for the link that proves Cavuto willfully lied.

Isn't deflection fun?

So are you saying he was forced against his will to give a number that he couldn't prove was real and was 3 times higher than his original off air estimate?? So where is your proof that he was forced to do it against his will?

Here is a question for you.

If an HONEST reporter was in cavuto's position and did not know for certain the numbers and had no official total would an HONEST reporter try to make up numbers and then talk up those phony numbers on air??

OH and since you are talking about defelction I am still waiting on your reponse to the fact that foxnews listed the republican governor of SC mark sanford as a democrat??

So can you respond or are you still too busy trying to deflect?

 

[Oddball]

I'm saying I want to see the evidence before I draw a conclusion.

Provide the link or shut up.

 

[drsmith1072]

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Nice lie pilgrim but I even asked you to go back and PROVE how I took anything that you said out of context and you failed.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

This is the same thing I did to your post. I seperately quoted your individual arguments and discredited them one by one in their full context and in response you FALSELY accused me of editing your posts and have continued to do so to CYA based on the fact that I discredited your spin.

The sad thing is that the majority of the righties on this board will do or say anything in a desperate attempt to smear and attack the messenger because they can't HONESTLY counter or debate the message. The last few pages of this thread are a perfect example of that.

 

[Wicked Jester]

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

Is that idiot engaging in that crap again?

I've got him on permanent ignore, so I can only guess.

Just put him on permanent ignore like so many others up here already have.

He's a strange, child like lil' troll, nothing more. He's not going to debate you. He'll twist your posts, and try to claim he's won. He's always been that way, and he'll never change.

Basically, you're just wasting your time even responding to him.

 

[drsmith1072]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

Yet we're still waiting for the link that proves Cavuto willfully lied.

Isn't deflection fun?

They would rather deflect by attacking the individuals posting instead of the topic.

and yet the video is proof in cavuto's own words how he had no clue as to the REAL number and then made up numbers for the live shot and in response the righties attacked the video, the source, and the messenger while they ignored the message. So it would seem that the righties are the desperate ones interested in deflecting. Imagine that.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

And all you're capable of is hurling comments from the peanut gallery...a spectator of life...a non-participant...

And your response to DUDE is different from your descriptions of his posts how?

And how is yours to me different?

easy, i never made the claim that all you were capable of is hurling comments from the penut gallery. I only made an observation of your post to dude containing the exact behavior you were berating dude for displaying.


I know you are smarter than this

 

[drsmith1072]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

Is that idiot engaging in that crap again?

I've got him on permanent ignore, so I can only guess.

Just put him on permanent ignore like so many others up here already have.

He's a strange, child like lil' troll, nothing more. He's not going to debate you. He'll twist your posts, and try to claim he's won. He's always been that way, and he'll never change.

Basically, you're just wasting your time even responding to him.

LOL and in typical cowardly fashion jester attacks me as he hides behind ignoring me. LOL

is this actually the same jester from the msnbc that used to threaten people and demand to know where they lived or that they meet him so he could "kick their ass"?? My how the internet tough guy has shown his true colors. LOL

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

how about because bfgrn has actually engaged in debate and presented links to support his arguments where as dude is apparently only capable of "hurling comments from the peanut gallery" and not providing anything of substance or andding anything to the debate.

Do you see the difference now??

Or is pilgrim still ignoring me because I busted him for being dishonest as he falsely accused me of something i didn't do and then ran away when asked to prove his allegation?

edit: post #245 is a perfect example of the difference. LOL

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Nice lie pilgrim but I even asked you to go back and PROVE how I took anything that you said out of context and you failed.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

This is the same thing I did to your post. I seperately quoted your individual arguments and discredited them one by one in their full context and in response you FALSELY accused me of editing your posts and have continued to do so to CYA based on the fact that I discredited your spin.

The sad thing is that the majority of the righties on this board will do or say anything in a desperate attempt to smear and attack the messenger because they can't HONESTLY counter or debate the message. The last few pages of this thread are a perfect example of that.

you creatively seperated my entire statements, which were qualified by previous language within the paragraph, so that they were no longer in context. Then your responses further removed them from their context in a way that misrepresented the argument I had made.

I'm not sure of your intelligence but i think your smart enough to know this is what you did.

 

[Wicked Jester]

i'm not ignoring you i just dont take you seriously after you hacked apart what I said in such a way to misrepresent my statements.

Nice lie pilgrim but I even asked you to go back and PROVE how I took anything that you said out of context and you failed.

Just ask Si Modo i think she was your latest creative quote modification.

This is the same thing I did to your post. I seperately quoted your individual arguments and discredited them one by one in their full context and in response you FALSELY accused me of editing your posts and have continued to do so to CYA based on the fact that I discredited your spin.

The sad thing is that the majority of the righties on this board will do or say anything in a desperate attempt to smear and attack the messenger because they can't HONESTLY counter or debate the message. The last few pages of this thread are a perfect example of that.

you creatively seperated my entire statements, which were qualified by previous language within the paragraph, so that they were no longer in context. Then your responses further removed them from their context in a way that misrepresented the argument I had made.

I'm not sure of your intelligence but i think your smart enough to know this is what you did.

See what I mean?

He's