Fox News makes Obama Cry

[Bfgrn]

I'm sorry, when WE kill innocent Iraqis or rape young women like Saddam Hussein or his sons, it's DIFFERENT...how foolish of me...I'm sure Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi and her family will be relieved...oh, that's right...they're DEAD...

So America was concerned about the health and well being of the Iraqi people ...THAT'S why we invaded their country...

Hey BTW Einstein, WHEN will America begin showing concern about the health and well being of AMERICANS?

"I think it’s just crazy. It's part of that worldview that led us to where we are. Think about it. The United States went and negotiated with and supported Saddam Hussein himself against Iran under this notion that sometimes my enemy is my friend. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That emboldened Saddam Hussein and allowed him to invade Kuwait. It made us go to war that we did not finish and did not take Saddam Hussein out."
Former Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas) 12/11/06 (The Hill)

-------------------------------------------

Former Marine Testifies to Atrocities in Iraq
Unit Killed Dozens of Unarmed Civilians Last Year, Canadian Refugee Board Is Told

By Doug Struck
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, December 8, 2004; Page A20

TORONTO, Dec. 7 -- A former U.S. Marine staff sergeant testified at a hearing Tuesday that his unit killed at least 30 unarmed civilians in Iraq during the war in 2003 and that Marines routinely shot and killed wounded Iraqis.

Jimmy J. Massey, a 12-year veteran, said he left Iraq in May 2003 after a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress. He said he and his men shot and killed four Iraqis staging a demonstration and a man with his hands up trying to surrender, as well as women and children at roadblocks. Massey said he had complained to his superiors about the "killing of innocent civilians," but that nothing was done.


In Haditha, Memories of a Massacre
Iraqi Townspeople Describe Slaying of 24 Civilians by Marines in Nov. 19 Incident

By Ellen Knickmeyer
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, May 27, 2006

BAGHDAD, May 26 -- Witnesses to the slaying of 24 Iraqi civilians by U.S. Marines in the western town of Haditha say the Americans shot men, women and children at close range in retaliation for the death of a Marine lance corporal in a roadside bombing.

Aws Fahmi, a Haditha resident who said he watched and listened from his home as Marines went from house to house killing members of three families, recalled hearing his neighbor across the street, Younis Salim Khafif, plead in English for his life and the lives of his family members. "I heard Younis speaking to the Americans, saying: 'I am a friend. I am good,' " Fahmi said. "But they killed him, and his wife and daughters."

The 24 Iraqi civilians killed on Nov. 19 included children and the women who were trying to shield them, witnesses told a Washington Post special correspondent in Haditha this week and U.S. investigators said in Washington. The girls killed inside Khafif's house were ages 14, 10, 5, 3 and 1, according to death certificates.

You do know that all charges were dropped against the Marines in the Haditha case.

Of course he/she does. He/she just wants to bash our soldiers. He/she is a friggin' idiot.

Notice how he/she is completely ignoring Sadaam's own confessions.

He/she is just your typical left wing nutjob who seriously needs to be slapped upside the head!

I am a he, so you/it won't have to type so many words...

I am not bashing our soldiers, they're HUMAN, they react no different than any other soldiers from ANY other country in any other war...

I'm bashing WAR... however you want to spin it, deny it or ignore it, WE...the United States of America brought the plague of WAR to the people of Iraq...thousands of innocent human beings no longer exist for ONE reason...America...

When you face your creator and he asks why you didn't speak out against the killing of what He created in His image, saying you were a "patriot" or an "American" won't cut it...

 

[Wicked Jester]

You do know that all charges were dropped against the Marines in the Haditha case.

Of course he/she does. He/she just wants to bash our soldiers. He/she is a friggin' idiot.

Notice how he/she is completely ignoring Sadaam's own confessions.

He/she is just your typical left wing nutjob who seriously needs to be slapped upside the head!

I am a he, so you/it won't have to type so many words...

I am not bashing our soldiers, they're HUMAN, they react no different than any other soldiers from ANY other country in any other war...

I'm bashing WAR... however you want to spin it, deny it or ignore it, WE...the United States of America brought the plague of WAR to the people of Iraq...thousands of innocent human beings no longer exist for ONE reason...America...

When you face your creator and he asks why you didn't speak out against the killing of what He created in His image, saying you were a "patriot" or an "American" won't cut it...

Seriously, you're a freakin whackjob!

Do you not remember the entire country of Iraq out celebrating when they finally realized that Sadaam was finished?

Sadaam spent years playing games. Spent years rattling his sabre. Spent years living a lie. Spent years killing and torturing his own people. He could have avoided it all. He chose to play games. Chose to give the impression that he had those weapons. Chose not to deny a relationship with Bin Laden. This is fully proven by his own words. Enough was enough. It was time to take his sabre and shove it firmly up his ass once and for all.

You can bash WAR until the cows come home. It makes no freakin' difference what you think. Humans have been at war as long as they have existed. It's a fact of life that will NEVER change.

Fact is, you can sit there with dreams of rainbows, unicorns, peace signs, tie dyed shirts, bongs and roach clips, but you will never see a world that is in line with your loony vision of reality. Fact is, Obama doesn't fart rose scented fairy dust, or shit ribbons of rainbows as you loony libs so desperately want to believe. He egg farts, and spews foul streams of shit JUST LIKE YOU!. And yes, like ALL HUMANS, he has a very violent side. It's human nature. You too have a very violent side, you're just too caught up in your loony liberal dreams to admit it.

Now, your beloved Messiah has no choice but to commit more troops. Therefore, he becomes one in the same. Those troops will no doubt unleash violence on a massive scale, and RIGHTFULLY so. People are going to die very violent and grotesque deaths. That is what happens in WAR. So, are you STILL going to support your beloved Messiah?

After all, he's the commander in chief sending soldiers off to do very violent things. Like I said, it makes him one in the same as those troops he's sending off to go commit mass slaughter on our enemies, and yes, innocents will die. It's inevitable.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Seems to me you've got this backward. All of the whining I hear is coming from Fox. What was Obama's comment on them......yes....not losing any sleep..... lol....

Fox is getting what it deserves. Heck, now the GOP wants Roger Ailles to run for POTUS. They are not even pretending it's a 'news' organization anymore.

Ain't it the truth .....

 

[saveliberty]

What do the supposed actions of a small minority of soldiers have to do with whether we should be in Iraq or not? More importantly, what does it have to do with what Obama needs to do in Iraq? Finally, how is it related to this topic of Fox News and a whiney President?

Answers:

1. Most soldiers have served honorably in Iraq. Several have brought wounded civilians back to the US for treatment.

2. Probably not a big factor, although he needs to articulate a policy soon.

3. Absolutely not a thing.

 

[nodoginnafight]

So what are trying you to do, lump all soldiers in with those scumbags?

Then why did I post:

Of course the actions of one or two certainly DO NOT reflect poorly on the entire U.S. Military. Even a few bad apples can surface ANYWHERE. Just like the nonesense of a couple of fake vets on message boards don't reflect the idiocy of anyone except themselves.

You get nailed spouting BS and THIS is all you can reply with - MORE BS that was ALREADY demonstrated false.
You're on a real roll today pumpkin

You got nailed when you fully admitted that you were a communist piece of shit on a Van Jones thread.

Taking you seriously on ANY issue that concerns this GREAT COUNTRY, the country you continually bash like your beloved Messiah, is not something any citizen who truly loves this country should ever do.

Fact is, you're !

And you prove it in every post!

Yeah - you claim a story is false until I shoved the coverage from your beloved Fox in your face, THEN you claim only five U.S. soldiers have been charged criminally for acts committed in Iraq and I shove some more of your beloved Fox coverage in your face proving THAT false and all you can come back with is calling me a communist who doesn't love his country.....

The only time I engage you at all pumpkin is when I'm up for a little batting pratice. You are so easy to disprove ....

 

[nodoginnafight]

What do the supposed actions of a small minority of soldiers have to do with whether we should be in Iraq or not? More importantly, what does it have to do with what Obama needs to do in Iraq? Finally, how is it related to this topic of Fox News and a whiney President?

Nothing at all imho.

 

[Wicked Jester]

Seems to me you've got this backward. All of the whining I hear is coming from Fox. What was Obama's comment on them......yes....not losing any sleep..... lol....

Fox is getting what it deserves. Heck, now the GOP wants Roger Ailles to run for POTUS. They are not even pretending it's a 'news' organization anymore.

Ain't it the truth .....

The truth is, dumbasses, Obama is getting hammered by FOX. They are exposing him with FACTS. FACTS he obviously can't dispute, hence, no support of Van Jones and a quiet tossing under the bus. Thanks to FOX news, the under carriage of said bus is being jammed full of his fellow corrupt scumbags. This is driving Obama and you ignorant fools who were dumb enough to vote for him ******* bonkers. So, Obama dispatches his fellow corrupt, marxist, communist, and overall liberal dirtbags to declare war on FOX news. Don't even dare to question the great Messiah!

LMAO!

**** Obama. He's an inept clown. FOX news is proving it by the day. That's most definitely causing your beloved Messiah to lose sleep. It's Obama and his lame duck administration who is doing the whining, and FOX news is laughing all the way to the bank as their ratings soar and sponsors continue to line up at the door.

Too bad for you liberal idiots, FOX news fully exposed your beloved LIBERAL organization known as ACORN in all their LIBERAL glory, as being fully willing to help facilitate in the disgusting crimes of exploiting and abusing innocent children. Yeah, you LIBERALS are sick ***** indeed. Your TRUE LIBERAL VALUES were shown to be what they truly are.

 

[Oldandtired]

The day I see on any of the alphabet evening news a story with proof that Foix news lied, I will admit I am wrong about fox news.

But, you see, Fox news does not lie. If it did, it would be front page, first story news.

Instead, we hear stories on blogs and left wing internet sites.

And before you profgressives claim that the REAL news agencies have better things to report on than fox news lying....dont go there...you will lose that debate.

FOx news does not lie. It reports.

Yes...fox news hammers home the "inexplicable" in an effort to get answers..

If the WH responded to the Van Jones communist claim, and the Van Jones "whites intentionally pollute black community" calim with something concrete, Fox would end the story....but you see, the WH refused to respond to Fox's valid questions...so they dug deeper as we would expect them to do.

Same with Ayers. They did not break the Ayers story....but when all of the other news organizations were satisfied with his first excuse of "I did not even know him" Fox responded with their investigation that showed that he did know him. When they said to THAT report that he did not know AYers' past, fox wanted to know why he was not hoinest to begin with ...and when he refused to answer, Fox dug deeper.

DO we not want our media to dig deep?

Really? Why not?

 

[nodoginnafight]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

Me no see linky link.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

Me no see linky link.

do you really needy needy? Can't you find it yourselfy selfy?

 

[xotoxi]

 

[Oddball]

The onus is on the poster to prove his assertion.

Methinks nodoginafight has a few dogs in the fight.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

Me no see linky link.

do you really needy needy? Can't you find it yourselfy selfy?

Nope, not how it worky works. You state claimy claim, you back it up your selfy self.

 

[Wicked Jester]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

Me no see linky link.

do you really needy needy? Can't you find it yourselfy selfy?

You made the claim commie. Back it up!

 

[Oldandtired]

Fox New's Neil Cavuto was busted for lying about San Fran tea party attendance.
I can understand that after having promoted the Tea Party sso much, they were embarassed by the turnout, so they needed to beef up those figures and Cavuto was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

So what?

There is no law against this type of lying.

Fox is free to say what they want and others are free to express what they think of Fox's choices.

No blood - no foul. That's free speech in action.

Neil Cavuto gave a number that was an estimate.
He was off....

But...

Is that the best you got for a news agency that CONSTANTLY lies about the administration?

By the way.....the oither news agencies said there were a few hundred in NY...one saying LESS than 100....the police estimated it at 13,000.

Saying 30K when only 15K is not nearly as obvious a lie as saying less than 100 when the actual number is 13,000..

The other news agencies said they were "violent" protesters...yet not a single arrest?

But FOX is a liar becuase it was off with the numbers.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Neil Cavuto gave a number that was an estimate.
He was off....

Neil Cavuto gave an estimate (when he thought he was off the air) and then inflated it while "on the air" Sacramento - not San Fran - I'm very sorry.

You said - show me one lie - I showed you one lie.

The truth is that you're going to rationalize and make any excuse you need to in order to defend your previously determined position. Which is fine - that's certainly your right. And it's the right of others to call 'em like they see 'em as well.

 

[Oldandtired]

Neil Cavuto gave a number that was an estimate.
He was off....

Neil Cavuto gave an estimate (when he thought he was off the air) and then inflated it while "on the air" Sacramento - not San Fran - I'm very sorry.

You said - show me one lie - I showed you one lie.

The truth is that you're going to rationalize and make any excuse you need to in order to defend your previously determined position. Which is fine - that's certainly your right. And it's the right of others to call 'em like they see 'em as well.

I said show me a lie....yes....but I again ask....is that the best you got?

Show me a lie that would give good reason to say they lie all the time...or most of the time...or even once in a while.

Do not give me an "estimate" that was off....and one that the bloigs say "he siad this and he siad that OFF the air..and then said this and then said that ON the air.

Give me a concrete DAMAGING lie....why is that so hard?

 

[Wicked Jester]

Neil Cavuto gave a number that was an estimate.
He was off....

Neil Cavuto gave an estimate (when he thought he was off the air) and then inflated it while "on the air" Sacramento - not San Fran - I'm very sorry.

You said - show me one lie - I showed you one lie.

The truth is that you're going to rationalize and make any excuse you need to in order to defend your previously determined position. Which is fine - that's certainly your right. And it's the right of others to call 'em like they see 'em as well.

So, what you are saying is that you don't have a link, can't provide the proof, and once again you're talking out of your SELF AVOWED communist ass AGAIN?

Get the **** outta here!

 

[nodoginnafight]

said show me a lie....yes....but I again ask....is that the best you got?

That's the first I got. Why? Is one not enough for you anymore?

oh no now you want:

Give me a concrete DAMAGING lie....why is that so hard?

"concrete" and "damaging" are subjective terms - So in reality you are saying, "Produce something that will make ME change MY mind."

That's probably tilting at windmills - I don't think you are likely to change your mind no matter what.

But you said, "show me a lie" I showed you a lie.

"Don't blame the messenger."