Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Ropey]

And you’re staying out of discussing Fox News.

Link or lie.

 

[berg80]

One of the telling differences between Dotard and Comey is the orange piece of shit did everything he could to avoid going to trial while Comey welcomes the opportunity to prove his innocence.

 

[westwall]

Even Comey is mocking the charges against him

Bring it on

Well, he has precedent. That region is heavily leftoid. Hopefully enough Hillary supporters remember his "betrayal" and fry him for it.

 

[postman]

One of the telling differences between Dotard and Comey is the orange piece of shit did everything he could to avoid going to trial while Comey welcomes the opportunity to prove his innocence.

Trump knew what he did. He knew he would never be found "not guilty".
So his only chance was to delay, and "not" to be found guilty.

 

[rightwinger]

Well, he has precedent. That region is heavily leftoid. Hopefully enough Hillary supporters remember his "betrayal" and fry him for it.

Case will live or die on the evidence against Comey
There is none

 

[westwall]

Case will live or die on the evidence against Comey
There is none

Ummmmmm, what about all that video evidence we have of him lying to Congress?

The evidence is overwhelming, but leftoids protect their own.

 

[Meister]

And be warned that the grand jury rejected one of the charges against Comey.
Now shoot your stat.

Yes, that is my exact point, the grand jury rejected one indictment.
Here is my point, they must have seen something on the other two.
You and I have no evidence, what we have is just playing politics.
So take that "warned" and go pound sand with it, Comrade.

 

[postman]

Ummmmmm, what about all that video evidence we have of him lying to Congress?

The evidence is overwhelming, but leftoids protect their own.

You wish they were lies.
No one has said they were given permission by Comey, to leak information.

The closest you have is informing Comey of their actions, after the fact.

 

[ColonelAngus]

COMEY
LIED
TO
CONGRESS

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN JIM COMEY.

YOU LEFT WING FUCKERS HATED HIM IN 2016….NOW YOU LICK HIS TAINT.

You assholes are just amazing.

 

[rightwinger]

BIden stayed out of it because he was out of it.

He preferred ()bama's leading from behind.

So, old Joe was... a behind.

As much as MAGA mocked Biden

Drooling, dementia riddled, no clue as to what is going on……

Biden knew enough to stay out of Trump prosecutions. Keep DOJ out of it, use special prosecutors……Refuse to comment on guilt or innocence.

But ******* moron Trump can’t stay out of it and keep his mouth shut. Demand prosecution, fire anyone who finds no evidence, bring in a prosecutor who does what she is told……Proclaim guilt

 

[rightwinger]

Ummmmmm, what about all that video evidence we have of him lying to Congress?

The evidence is overwhelming, but leftoids protect their own.

I saw no lie

I saw him contradict what McCabe said
The same McCabe Trump claims is a liar

Trump is your worst enemy

 

[Ropey]

Drooling, dementia riddled, no clue as to what is going on……

You have no point other than that.

btw, can you still determine, by watching them, if 9 year old boys are gay or not?

Bet you don't answer that one.

 

[postman]

Yes, that is my exact point, the grand jury rejected one indictment.
Here is my point, they must have seen something on the other two.
You and I have no evidence, what we have is just playing politics.
So take that "warned" and go pound sand with it, Comrade.

Remember, a grand jury is made up of 23 people. You only need a simple majority (12) to approve a "true bill".

In Comeys case, they could only convince 14 (with 9 dissenting) that Comey "probably" did what they said he did.

 

[Ropey]

Just watch what happens to Comey.

 

[Rogue AI]

How many times have the 'experts' been wrong? At least half of them are wrong in every case. People should stop listening to such nonsense.

 

[postman]

Just watch what happens to Comey.

That's what you said after the "8647" incident.

And that was a nothing burger.

 

[postman]

How many times have the 'experts' been wrong? At least half of them are wrong in every case. People should stop listening to such nonsense.

People should listen to experts. But not just the experts "opinion" but the reasoning behind that opinion.

It's kinda like in math class, where the teacher didn't just want the answer, but you had to "show your work".

 

[rightwinger]

You have no point other than that.

btw, can you still determine, by watching them, if 9 year old boys are gay or not?

Bet you don't answer that one.

?

 

[Rogue AI]

People should listen to experts. But not just the experts "opinion" but the reasoning behind that opinion.

Not on TV they shouldn't. Those folks are there for entertainment value, not to educate or any other useful purpose. I wouldn't listen to any expert I wasn't paying or wasn't being paid for the express purpose of specific advice in their field of expertise. These TV hacks have no inside information to these cases, they are not part of the process, and at best they can only cite unnamed or anonymous 'sources' which very well might not even exist.

 

[citygator]

Sigh. No one on here believes this charge. Comey’s a toad republican being eaten by the monster he helped make so I give zero shits if they bury him under the jail. However:

James Comey answered "No" when asked if he had authorized anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source for news reports about the Trump or Clinton investigations.

McCabe never told investigators that Comey had authorized him to talk to the media, only that the FBI director was aware that McCabe had done so.

Richman said Comey had never authorized him to speak to the media about the Clinton investigation.