Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Meister]

By the way, everyone knows that grand jury is indicts “even a ham sandwich”” as the saying goes. So your pretending that it’s a shock that an indictment was issues is just that. You pretending.

Not in this polarized environment, politically speaking, or judicially speaking.
Where the hell have you been, comrade?

 

[Lesh]

Did he lie to the Senate about leaking?

Not that I know of. Neither did Comey from what I can tell so far

 

[Meister]

Horseshit. If trump hadn't instructed Halligan to take from what all accounts is an extremely weak case to the grand jury, because he considers Comey to be an enemy, Comey wouldn't be indicted.

Here's an interesting question. Who is in a better position to judge whether a conviction can be achieved against Comey based on the law and the facts...........the grand jury or the people in the US Attorney's office?

It really does seem that the LIBERAL GRAND JURY would have thrown out the
other two indictments like they did with the other one.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Not that I know of. Neither did Comey from what I can tell so far

Fair enough.

Let's see what the jury can tell after they see and hear the evidence.

 

[Donald H]

This is expected of a fascist regime.

The timing just seems a little off?

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is expected of a fascist regime.

The timing just seems a little off?

Interesting take.

How is the timing off?

 

[postman]

Let’s see an email or tape

Trumps interference will work against the prosecution

Trump (as chief law enforcement officer) said that Comey was guilty as sin.
He also said the same of Adam Schiff and Leticia James.

That's corrupting the potential jury pool.

Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,

 

[Ropey]

It is interesting that a very liberal Grand Jury indicted
Comey on 2 of the 3 charges.
This wasn't Trump indicting Comey, but his peers that indicted him.

That's always been the leftist strategy. Infiltrate and destroy the system.

In the same way that:

All 3 of the Pensylvania Justices ruled to overturn Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction.

iow:

Wecht, Donohue, & Dougherty ruled to overturn Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction.

So, they actually advocate for pedophile, while pretending to be against pedophilia.

 

[postman]

Comey is entitled to see all the evidence against him

Let s see it

Comey is also entitled to all the exculpatory evidence in his favor.

Like the memo's by other prosecutors, spelling out why they didn't try to indict Comey.

 

[Marener]

Yeah....and? Liberal grand jury indicting a liberal under the Trump administration
is saying something.

Prosecutors don’t just take any case they can get past the grand jury.

There are a lot of cases that you can get by a grand jury but don’t stand chance at trial.

When DoJ prosecutors took cases against the Trump administration, they had a strong chance at getting a conviction, and they did pretty much every time. I can’t think of any charges that failed to get a conviction.

 

[Marener]

That's why I said Comey's lawyers would get it before the trial. You think they will release it before the trial?

Sadly not your dumbest statement of all time.

I’m sure that before trial we will actually know what the hack is trying to prosecute.

Right now, everyone is guessing what the facts are.

 

[Donald H]

Interesting take.

How is the timing off?

A budding fascist regime doesn't want to awaken their enemies by having the courts bringing biased decisions in favour of the regime.

It could become the making of a military junta against Trump.

Otherwise there's nearly nothing that can stop fascism.

 

[Lesh]

A budding fascist regime doesn't want to awaken their enemies by having the courts bringing biased decisions in favour of the regime.

It could become the making of a military junta against Trump.

Otherwise there's nearly nothing that can stop fascism.

Good Lord.

The Krazy

 

[berg80]

This is about Trump's fragile ego and his credulous rube base. That's it. As usual.

It's also about discrediting those who stand in opposition to trumpery by the only means at his disposal, character assassination. And in so doing trying, in a backhanded way, to try to prove he has been persecuted.

 

[Mac1958]

It's also about discrediting those who stand in opposition to trumpery by the only means at his disposal, character assassination. And in so doing trying, in a backhanded way, to try to prove he has been persecuted.

The biggest snowflake in the history of historical histories.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump (as chief law enforcement officer) said that Comey was guilty as sin. He also said the same of Adam Schiff and Leticia James. That's corrupting the potential jury pool. Sixth Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,

Trump (as chief law enforcement officer) said that Comey was guilty as sin. He also said the same of Adam Schiff and Leticia James. That's corrupting the potential jury pool. Sixth Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,

Comey is also entitled to all the exculpatory evidence in his favor. Like the memo's by other prosecutors, spelling out why they didn't try to indict Comey.

Prosecutors don’t just take any case they can get past the grand jury.

There are a lot of cases that you can get by a grand jury but don’t stand chance at trial.

When DoJ prosecutors took cases against the Trump administration, they had a strong chance at getting a conviction, and they did pretty much every time. I can’t think of any charges that failed to get a conviction.

Notice how Biden stayed out of it, used Special Prosecutors and refused to comment on guilt or innocence

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Not in this polarized environment, politically speaking, or judicially speaking.
Where the hell have you been, comrade?

What is the indictment rate in this polarized environment but be warned, that if you don’t give me a statistic, you are admitting to making it all up.
And be warned that the grand jury rejected one of the charges against Comey.
Now shoot your stat.

 

[Ropey]

Notice how Biden stayed out of it, used Special Prosecutors and refused to comment on guilt or innocence

BIden stayed out of it because he was out of it.

He preferred ()bama's leading from behind.

So, old Joe was... a behind.

 

[postman]

Interesting take.

How is the timing off?

The "lie" was something Comey testified to congress about in 2017.
They had 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 to prosecute Comey, but they didn't.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

BIden stayed out of it because he was out of it.

And you’re staying out of discussing Fox News.