Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

What crime did she break?

Did she know that a district court would rule this way? Or was she acting under legal cover of law? Moreover should we see what a circuit court rules?

It’s not like it’s over like the Jack smith case, where he admitted he was illegally appointed
Her appointment was the crime and again trump is the criminal behind all of this bullshit. Broke my own rule about not responding to your jibberish and comparing apples to oranges.
 
This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."


The judge who dismissed these cases today was Cameron McGowan Currie. Was appointed by a reasonable president Bill Clinton based on qualifications , not party or personal allegiance.
 
Which it would not be, if dismissed for the reason it was dismissed, which did not consider the merits.
The judge could have ended it all by adding 'with prejudice'.

You can bullshit all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you can't bullshit all of the people all of the time.

You're full of bullshit.... all of the time.

So is Halligan’s.
Subject to appeal.

Mail truck in the shop today?
 
The judge could have ended it all by adding 'with prejudice'.
Which would have been unethical, considering that was not appropriate to the ruling.

So, to a judge who follows the rules, no, he could not have done so.
 
Subject to appeal.
Same goes for Jack Smith’s case.

But good luck finding a prosecutor who is willing to look as stupid as Halligan. The court sure as hell won’t appoint someone so depraved.
 
Which would have been unethical, considering that was not appropriate to the ruling.

So, to a judge who follows the rules, no, he could not have done so.
Leaving the door open for refiling.
Have to wait and see how the appeals process goes.
 
Leaving the door open for refiling.
Correct, as dictated by the decision.

Only problem... as already described to you multiple times... is that, for the first go around, the fat rapist had to illegally appoint an incompetent, corrupt lawyer to bring the case, as nobody else would bring it.

He played his illegal trick and lost. Can't play it again.
 
Same goes for Jack Smith’s case.

But good luck finding a prosecutor who is willing to look as stupid as Halligan. The court sure as hell won’t appoint someone so depraved.
Can trump remove her from office and replace her with another stupid yes person ? Or is it in the courts realm now ?
 
Dismissed, charges against Trump dropped.
In one of three cases, and done so by an unethical judge who went against all precedent. Oops, you forgot to mention any of that.

It was the fat rapist charity thief who had to "dismiss" the other cases against himself.
 
Correct, as dictated by the decision.

Only problem... as already described to you multiple times... is that, for the first go around, the fat rapist had to illegally appoint an incompetent, corrupt lawyer to bring the case, as nobody else would bring it.

He played his illegal trick and lost. Can't play it again.
Just like a banana....... this has appeal...... :auiqs.jpg:

In one of three cases, and done so by an unethical judge who went against all precedent. Oops, you forgot to mention any of that.

It was Smith who dismissed the case against Trump.
 
No, it was Cannon.

I am not interested in your time wasting trolling.

Special counsel Jack Smith drops election subversion and classified documents cases against Donald Trump


200w.gif
 
15th post
"IF " at all. This witch hunt of trump's is backfiring on him. Rightfully so.
This is exactly what everyone expected, when a career criminal was rewarded with reelection.

Look at poor delldude. He's like an old lady desperately pouring through the remains of her burnt down house, looking for something... anything...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom