lol, your dumb assedness has hit new highs.
The second amendment does not mean what you apparently think it means, fool.
Cowardly *****
You think the second amendment only applies to you running around my store with a gun? Guess again girly man
I am allowed to be armed and I am allowed to protect myself if you are a threat
And I get to decide if you are a threat
No, you stupid shithead, you don't get to decide who is a threat. The law does that and it requires a minimum amount of violence be done or threats to be made.
But you are too stupid to grasp the point; you have been turned into an idiot by your I
ideology.
Hey Jim: by the same token, the same standards are supposed to protect the rights of the people to security in our houses, persons, and effects;
we are supposed to have the inalienable right to 'assemble peaceably' in public.
Any breach of the peace, threat to disrupt, or exert more force on others instead of respecting "equal protection of the laws"
can ITSELF be outside the spirit of the laws and deemed a threat. How can anyone enforce laws while breaching them?
The PROPER way to resolve such imposition would be to resolve the grievances DIRECTLY with the parties in conflict.
(this is also Biblical as in Matthew 18:15-20 to address trespasses one on one in person, to solve the problem, BEFORE taking it public)
If gun owners who deem their rights are being violated or threatened want to SOLVE the problem,
they should use democratic civil means of petitioning and negotiating DIRECTLY
with the people they accuse of violating rights. Not go punish "other people" collectively or collaterally.
It's like "due process" where the accused are supposed to be confronted DIRECTLY
with the charges or complaints against them, and have a chance to answer to them.
Where are the people who did the wrongs in threatening responsible gun rights?
If these people are addressed directly, there is no need to go demonstrate and protest to other people who never had a chance to answer before they were confronted this way!
So Jim, if you want to enforce the SPIRIT of Constitutional laws,
we need to follow the WHOLE process: due process, right to petition to redress grievances, etc. And not "skip steps" by assuming guilt and then go protest in whatever manner in front of other people without first addressing what the complaints are.
BOTH sides of a conflict need to follow the spirit of the laws
so there is equal respect and protection of the democratic process.