Former Trump aide Kash Patel set to testify in Mar-a-Lago docs probe: report

[g5000]

2 years and running, and Trump is still relevant.

1. No one is above the law.

2. So long as Crooked Donald continues to cocktease the tards about a 2024 run, he will be relevant.

3. The Right went after Hillary every day for YEARS before she ran in 2016.

 

[Nostra]

That would be when they could either impanel or select a grand jury for the purpose of rendering an indictment. Add to that the time to get people to honor subpoenas, and the grand jury returning a true bill.

So it could easily take until January or later.

Any. Day. Now.

Day 4,264,836,719,953

 

[g5000]

Yeah. When did he plead immunity? Cite it. Be very specific. No bullshit speculation.

Go.

No one pleads immunity.

They ask for it, and the court decides whether or not to grant it.

Patel has been offered immunity by the court. You can't plead the Fifth if you have immunity.

It is precisely because Patel hid behind the Fifth that the court has now given him immunity.

Seriously, man. Stop. Stop making a complete ass of yourself in public.

Justice Dept. Offers Immunity to Trump Aide for Testimony in Documents Case​

​

 

[BackAgain]

So what? Another mere opinion offered from a loser like you.

 

[g5000]

So what? Another mere opinion offered from a loser like you.

A statement of fact by an Attorney General who has more knowledge of the facts in the sole of his shoe than you have in your entire deluded body.

One of the facts he stated is that Traitor Trump had become "detached from reality".

Just like you!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes. It does mean the 5th isn’t available.

No reason to believe he would lie anyway. But if he did lie, one way or the other, the gubmint would be obliged to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

False. He wouldn’t have any obligation to prove anything. All he would have to do is simply testify about what he knew.

We don’t “know” any such thing. You don’t believe he can say it honestly. I believe he can. So?

Or acknowledge that he did hear what he said he heard. You keep forgetting that one.

No. It doesn’t. But it would make it a tad less easy. For, despite your usual vacancy, we do know of at least one other person who says that President Trump declassified the previously classified documents at issue.

Which agencies whose docs Trump possessed and allegedly declassified were informed of or were otherwise aware of their declassification?

None of course. The DOJ knows this. They’ve already determined that. It’s how the National Archives knew what was missing and that it was classified.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yeah. When did he plead immunity? Cite it. Be very specific. No bullshit speculation.
Go.

Derp…

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna55488

 

[g5000]

18 U.S. Code § 6002 - Immunity generally

www.law.cornell.edu

18 U.S. Code § 6002 - Immunity generally​

Whenever a witness refuses, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or provide other information in a proceeding before or ancillary to—

(1) a court or grand jury of the United States,

(2) an agency of the United States, or

(3) either House of Congress, a joint committee of the two Houses, or a committee or a subcommittee of either House,

and the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness an order issued under this title, the witness may not refuse to comply with the order on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination; but no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.


For those who don't comprehend legalese, that means anyone given immunity cannot plead the Fifth.

 

[g5000]

Which agencies whose docs Trump possessed and allegedly declassified were informed of or were otherwise aware of their declassification?

None of course. The DOJ knows this. They’ve already determined that. It’s how the National Archives knew what was missing and that it was classified.

The classification issue is a red herring. It doesn't matter if they were classified or not.

The US Codes under which Crooked Donald is in jeopardy deal with the theft of government property, and the concealment thereof.

 

[g5000]

Yeah. When did he plead immunity?

The very phrasing of your question reveals your staggering ignorance.

Sad.

 

[MagicMike]

So what? Another mere opinion offered from a loser like you.

Funny how quickly you all threw Bill Barr under the bus just as soon as he stopped playing your game.

I remember when he was a virtual demi-god to you Trumptards back when he got out in front of the Mueller Report and told you all ALL the lies you wanted to hear about it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The classification issue is a red herring. It doesn't matter if they were classified or not.

The US Codes under which Crooked Donald is in jeopardy deal with the theft of government property, and the concealment thereof.

I agree. The classified docs are a whole other set of legal problems for Trump. It’s his personal
attempts to conceal any and all docs and the associated obstruction of the govt’s efforts to recover them that is the main issue.

 

[g5000]

Crooked Donald's magical mind pleads immunity from the truth!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Patel is Trump’s only defender of his supposed declassifications. He’ll have to put up or shut it down. Either way it clears the way for prosecuting Trump.

What law was broken? Why can't you liberal airheads come up with something?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Won’t be long. I predict he’ll be charged shortly after the new year.

Charged with what?

 

[BackAgain]

No one pleads immunity.

True. I meant plead the fifth. Again when did he do that?

They ask for it, and the court decides whether or not to grant it.

Incorrect. They assert it. (Meaning the fifth.). Except in very rare circumstances, judges can’t compel a witness to testify despite the invocation of the fifth.

Patel has been offered immunity by the court.

Cite it. The court cannot offer immunity unless the prosecutor has requested it.

You can't plead the Fifth if you have immunity.

Finally, you’ve said one thing correct. Of course, it’s not disputed.

It is precisely because Patel hid behind the Fifth that the court has now given him immunity.

You don’t know that he invoked the fifth. And you don’t know it because you can’t know it. Grand jury proceedings are secret. For all you know, albeit unlikely, Patel instead invoked a Trump claim of Executive Privilege.

But, let’s go further let’s assume for the sake of discussion that your speculation is right. Let’s say that Patel had been called before the Grand Jury. And let’s further assume that he invoked the fifth. (Why? I wouldn’t know. But maybe he fears that something he says could be used against him by our vindictive politicized DOJ?)

Now, frustrated, the DOJ has to meekly ask a judge to confer immunity on the witness. And being that this is the upside down new universe, the judge says “uh. Ok.” So, now, when Patel says “yep. Trump did say that he was making a standing order to declassify the documents” what follows?

Seriously, man. Stop. Stop making a complete ass of yourself in public.

Seriously, girl. I’m only exposing you as the completely ignorant dishonest ywat you always are. You’re welcome.

Your final link is to the NY Slimes which is not exactly a credible source for news, anymore. Besides, it’s behind a paywall. But let’s assume it’s the truth. Again: so what?​

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Charged with what?

Grossly impudent twattery.

 

[g5000]

True. I meant plead the fifth. Again when did he do that?

Incorrect. They assert it. (Meaning the fifth.). Except in very rare circumstances, judges can’t compel a witness to testify despite the invocation of the fifth.

Cite it. The court cannot offer immunity unless the prosecutor has requested it.

Finally, you’ve said one thing correct. Of course, it’s not disputed.

You don’t know that he invoked the fifth. And you don’t know it because you can’t know it. Grand jury proceedings are secret. For all you know, albeit unlikely, Patel instead invoked a Trump claim of Executive Privilege.

But, let’s go further let’s assume for the sake of discussion that your speculation is right. Let’s say that Patel had been called before the Grand Jury. And let’s further assume that he invoked the fifth. (Why? I wouldn’t know. But maybe he fears that something he says could be used against him by our vindictive politicized DOJ?)

Now, frustrated, the DOJ has to meekly ask a judge to confer immunity on the witness. And being that this is the upside down new universe, the judge says “uh. Ok.” So, now, when Patel says “yep. Trump did say that he was making a standing order to declassify the documents” what follows?

Seriously, girl. I’m only exposing you as the completely ignorant dishonest ywat you always are. You’re welcome.

Your final link is to the NY Slimes which is not exactly a credible source for news, anymore. Besides, it’s behind a paywall. But let’s assume it’s the truth. Again: so what?​

You really should read the link, ignoramus. Don't be so willfully stupid.

I'm actually becoming very embarrassed for you.


The offer of immunity came about a month after Mr. Patel invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination in front of the grand jury and refused to answer questions from prosecutors investigating whether Mr. Trump improperly took national security documents with him when he left the White House and subsequently obstructed attempts by the government to retrieve them.

During Mr. Patel’s initial grand jury appearance, one of the people familiar with the matter said, Judge Beryl A. Howell of Federal District Court in Washington acknowledged Mr. Patel’s Fifth Amendment claims and said the only way he could be forced to testify was if the government offered him immunity.

 

[g5000]

And all the tards say, "Nuh-uh!"

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So he’ll claim the fifth of course

Didn't read the article, did you dumbass?