The Supreme Court did not neglect it's duty. You are not automatically entitled to a Supreme Court hearing. You must provide evidence of what you are alleging.
The court refused to examine evidence, establish facts and listen to witnesses in a case it has original and exclusive jurisdiction over.
In original jurisdiction cases, such as the Texas lawsuit is, the Supreme Court usually appoints a “special master” who then hears the evidence, establishes facts, and then makes its recommendation to the Court. To the best of my knowledge a special “Master’ was never appointed. The Court refused to allow a hearing of the Bill of Complaint, review evidence, listen to sworn witnesses, and it ducked the case by falsely asserting Texas had not demonstrated a "judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections".
There can be no “unity” between socialist Leaders who lure voters with a piece of free government cheese, and Leaders who support and defend rights associated with property ownership, a meritocracy and a free market, free enterprise system!