easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,235
- 2,645
Judge won't release drafts of Hillary Clinton Whitewater indictment
Judge won't release drafts of Hillary Clinton Whitewater indictment
...on the grounds that it is too damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign!
"U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton ruled Tuesday that Clinton's "substantial privacy interest" outweighed any public interest in disclosure and that the material was protected from disclosure by a court rule enforcing grand jury secrecy."
Gee, funny how that doesn't / didn't apply to Trump's liberal illegally obtained released partial tax returns.
""The fact that information about the independent counsel’s investigation and potential indictment of Mrs. Clinton is readily available to the public does not extinguish Mrs. Clinton’s privacy interest," Walton wrote. "Although an individual’s interests in privacy fade when the information involved already appears on the public record'...'the fact that an event is not wholly private does not mean that an individual has no interest in limiting disclosure or dissemination of [the requested] information,'" the judge added, quoting earlier cases."
You can be sure as hell that Hillary has a massive interest in not having that information disclosed and / or disseminated to the public!
Hillary, SHOW US YOUR INDICTMENT!
'Americans have a right to know!'
'It directly impacts on the character of the candidate running for President.'
'What are you hiding?'
I am sure I missed some of the statement Libs have used in demanding Trump's tax returns that also apply here...even more so...but it's a start!
Fork 'em over Hidebeast!
Judge won't release drafts of Hillary Clinton Whitewater indictment
...on the grounds that it is too damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign!
"U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton ruled Tuesday that Clinton's "substantial privacy interest" outweighed any public interest in disclosure and that the material was protected from disclosure by a court rule enforcing grand jury secrecy."
Gee, funny how that doesn't / didn't apply to Trump's liberal illegally obtained released partial tax returns.
""The fact that information about the independent counsel’s investigation and potential indictment of Mrs. Clinton is readily available to the public does not extinguish Mrs. Clinton’s privacy interest," Walton wrote. "Although an individual’s interests in privacy fade when the information involved already appears on the public record'...'the fact that an event is not wholly private does not mean that an individual has no interest in limiting disclosure or dissemination of [the requested] information,'" the judge added, quoting earlier cases."
You can be sure as hell that Hillary has a massive interest in not having that information disclosed and / or disseminated to the public!
Hillary, SHOW US YOUR INDICTMENT!
'Americans have a right to know!'
'It directly impacts on the character of the candidate running for President.'
'What are you hiding?'
I am sure I missed some of the statement Libs have used in demanding Trump's tax returns that also apply here...even more so...but it's a start!
Fork 'em over Hidebeast!
