Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
You know what is stunningly funny; you used ADJUSTED DATA for all of your graphs.. That's right, made up crap and the site you took them from is SKS... The cartoon boys who couldn't beat their way out of a wet paper bag.
NO Attribution...
No DATA set identification...
NO Methods identification...or explanations..
SO tell me where you got this "credible" crap from or are you scared that revealing your lies source would make it easier for me to discredit? The fact you provided no information is proof enough of your deceptions. The fact you failed to credit Skeptical Science as its source is funny as hell.
And yet when Evans predictions are place against unaltered data he is right on the money..
Last edited: