For those Who Want to Know: The Dem Playbook on Mass Shootings

[leftwinger]

Except for most mass shooters are Republicans. Just ask Elon's AI which party is more violent.

Stupid OX. Blacks are shooting 4000 per year just in CHI. 'Yet you crow they are "Republicans". Is there some kind of one size fits all for "Republicans"? You are really out of it. I can't keep up policing you. FBI....check this guy out.

 

[leftwinger]

Except for most mass shooters are Republicans. Just ask Elon's AI which party is more violent.

Stupid OX. AI is just a search engine thru Google LW pablum articles floated to the top.

 

[Votto]

The topic is Trannies given guns as they are now shooting up schools as a final act of Look at me or whatever. Take your generic grab bag of spin and shove it up your boyfriends butt.

If the evidence shows that trannies are a problem, should the Left then push for gun restrictions for trannies?

You know the answer would be a resounding NO!!!, as you then sit back and laugh at their hypocrisy regarding the matter.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Let's examine this latest mass shooting in Minneapolis. The shooter was a Tranny who hated Trump, was virulently Anti-Christian, Anti-Jewish, Pro Hamas, hated Israel, Pro Intifada and clearly hated anything that smacked of traditional America or American values. In other words, a fairly typical Dim voter who would support a Mamdani or AOC all day long.

The evil and hatred that consumed this sick asshole is beyond belief.


So, it begs the question: How would the legacy media cover such an event? Well, since it was one of their own, it is not about a Tranny, Trump and America hating Anti-Christian, Jew hating sick asshole. It's about gun violence. Yep....the guns made him do it. And if any of you mention that this boy was a mentally ill sexual deviant, then weep for the poor oppressed Tranny community, and you are a bigot. Now it the shooter was not associated with the far-Left wing like this guy, well it is not about guns, it's about the evils of Maga. See how that goes? The hypocrisy is stunning.

No concern expressed for Catholics. No mention it was a hate crime. No mention that the Tranny asshole deliberately targeted young children attending a mass. Nope, it was the guns and a poor misunderstood Tranny victim.

And the mainstream media wonders why no one believes them anymore and tunes them out.


Discuss.

Every country has crazy people but the USA has the highest per capita mass shootings than any other developed country by a substantial amount. (see reference below)
Why? That needs to be answered. There is something in our culture that has crazy people turn to mass shootings more than other cultures.
Thoughts and prayers will not solve it. Blaming main stream media or democrats or anything or anybody other than systemic problems in our society will not solve it.

It is time everyone quit using their stock answers about mass shooting and we get real about what is causing such a high number of mass shootings and such a high number of mass shootings that are in our schools.

Public Mass Shootings Around the World: Prevalence, Context, and Prevention | Rockefeller Institute of Government

rockinst.org

 

[sealybobo]

The topic is Trannies given guns as they are now shooting up schools as a final act of Look at me or whatever. Take your generic grab bag of spin and shove it up your boyfriends butt.

Excuse me? So you want to make being a tranny something that disqualifies you from owning a gun? How about the next time a hetero shoots up something? Should we ban all hetero men from owning guns?

Maybe we should pass a law that only women can carry guns. They rarely shoot anything up.

This tranny doesn't realize that by shooting up the church he proved he's a dude. Also the way he killed himself. Women usually take pills or sit in the car in the garage. Or slit the wrists. Non violent ways.

 

[mudwhistle]

During the protest, along with others I am privy too, the police were told to stand down, that is, the police were told to stand down off the record while their cities were being burned to the ground and looted by Left wingers.

Again, the Left was just begging for this to happen because they own the very police force that they claim are all systemically racist in these large cities, so I don't blame the kid for acting in this way to help protect law abiding citizens.

The kid did not even shoot any Blacks from what I heard, and he was not a white supremacist as Joe Biden and company claimed as there is no evidence of it. The teen was defamed by the President of the US and the entire Left, and with zero compensation.

I think what terrifies the Left the most about Rittenhouse is, someone like him exhibiting courage, courage to fight the lawlessness they foment.

 

[Votto]

What pisses me off is that a BLM protester was doing exactly what Kyle here was doing. And a MAGA asshole sitting in his car saw the BLM guy with a rifle like Kyle's walking towards him. So he murdered the BLM guy. He was found guilty and Governor Abbott of Texas let the murderer go.

What if someone sitting in a parked car saw Kyle walking towards them with that gun? Would they have been justified in killing him? Why not? Is it because he's a conservative and the BLM guy was a liberal?

Are you privy to the court case? Were you there getting all the evidence?

Evidentially, you believe that the justice system is systemically racist as the reason he was not found guilty of murder and punished accordingly.

 

[sealybobo]

Stupid OX. Blacks are shooting 4000 per year just in CHI. 'Yet you crow they are "Republicans". Is there some kind of one size fits all for "Republicans"? You are really out of it. I can't keep up policing you. FBI....check this guy out.

Those aren't political. I don't think those murderers vote.

Most rampages are committed by conservatives.

In June 2025, Elon Musk criticized his AI chatbot Grok on X after it concluded that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly in the U.S. since 2016. Grok's response was prompted by a user asking which political side had been more violent.

• More frequent and deadly: Grok cited data suggesting that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly since 2016.
• Specific examples: It specifically mentioned the January 6 Capitol riot and mass shootings like the one in El Paso in 2019 as examples of fatal right-wing violence.
• Left-wing violence: The chatbot also noted an increase in left-wing violence during the 2020 protests, but stated it tended to be "less lethal, often targeting property".

 

[leftwinger]

What state is it legal to conceal carry a gun without getting a permit to carry one? I hate it that in MI you have to take a class. It takes up your entire Saturday.

In Michigan you can open carry. But I wouldn't try it.

AI LW search says:
As of June 2025, states with permitless carry laws include:

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

 

[struth]

Playbook

Don’t provide the tools to make a mass shooters job easier

You mean like get people with mental health issues treatment instead of tampons?

You mean enforcing gun laws on the books instead of pardoning people that lie on background checks?

Sorry you dembots have no credibility on this issue

 

[Votto]

Those aren't political. I don't think those murderers vote.

Most rampages are committed by conservatives.

In June 2025, Elon Musk criticized his AI chatbot Grok on X after it concluded that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly in the U.S. since 2016. Grok's response was prompted by a user asking which political side had been more violent.

• More frequent and deadly: Grok cited data suggesting that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly since 2016.
• Specific examples: It specifically mentioned the January 6 Capitol riot and mass shootings like the one in El Paso in 2019 as examples of fatal right-wing violence.
• Left-wing violence: The chatbot also noted an increase in left-wing violence during the 2020 protests, but stated it tended to be "less lethal, often targeting property".

You can only cite the January 6th protest, which is where things got out of hand and only one person was shot dead, an unarmed woman in the Capital shot by police at the Capital.

Try again.

 

[Rawley]

Playbook

Don’t provide the tools to make a mass shooters job easier

Well, if we kept gender dysphoria classified as a mental illness (which it is), he might not have been able to purchase the tools.

 

[leftwinger]

Those aren't political. I don't think those murderers vote.

Most rampages are committed by conservatives.

In June 2025, Elon Musk criticized his AI chatbot Grok on X after it concluded that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly in the U.S. since 2016. Grok's response was prompted by a user asking which political side had been more violent.

• More frequent and deadly: Grok cited data suggesting that right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly since 2016.
• Specific examples: It specifically mentioned the January 6 Capitol riot and mass shootings like the one in El Paso in 2019 as examples of fatal right-wing violence.
• Left-wing violence: The chatbot also noted an increase in left-wing violence during the 2020 protests, but stated it tended to be "less lethal, often targeting property".

Get off the boards you sweathog.
The most recent ~10 shooters (media driven high profile) were tranny or imported and upset with the USA as far as I know.


One site claimed to track it it by 4 or more?
The Mass Shooting Tracker is a crowd-sourced database of U.S. mass shootings. We define a “mass shooting” as a single outburst of violence in which four or more people are shot. This is not the same as mass murder as defined by the FBI.

Yet you with your infinite wisdom can say these are all Republican. Quit wasting peoples bandwith.

Mass Shooting Tracker

massshootingtracker.site

 

[Votto]

Get off the boards you sweathog. The most recent ~10 shooters were tranny or imported and upset with the USA as far as I know.

The notion that the right is so gun violent is just absurd

Here we sit in a country where the entire GOP Congress was almost gunned down by a Leftist, a conservative Supreme Court member was almost gunned down at his home, and the President of the United States was shot, yet the right is just as gun violent?

If half of what has happened to conservatives had happened to democrats, that is all you would hear about.

The Left is just like Che, a murderer with a gun, which is why they wear his T shirts with pride.

 

[Rawley]

Most crazies are of no threat to violence

Those who are should be denied guns
Red Flag their ass

Minnesota has a Red Flag law. How'd that work out?

 

[leftwinger]

You mean like get people with mental health issues treatment instead of tampons?

You mean enforcing gun laws on the books instead of pardoning people that lie on background checks?

Sorry you dembots have no credibility on this issue

The idiots vote for it and shove it down normal peoples kids throats then want it "stopped"? Some are too far gone to save.

 

[struth]

Minnesota has a Red Flag law. How'd that work out?

The governor, the dems vp nominee, gsve this guy a tampon instead of a flag

 

[scruffy]

.

Acromegaly.

 

[leftwinger]

Stupid OX SillyBozo spouting nonsense every thread almost every time he shows up.:

Hey @Grok. Some lunatic on another site says "ALL mass shooters" are Republican. HUH? Is that anywhere true? What is a mass shooter? Is it 4 or more shot in single episode?

Searching
The claim that "ALL mass shooters" are Republican is not supported by evidence and is a gross generalization. Political affiliations of mass shooters vary widely, and reliable data shows no consistent pattern tying them exclusively to any single political party. Let’s break this down.What is a Mass Shooter?There’s no universal definition of a "mass shooter," which complicates analysis. Different organizations use varying criteria:

• FBI Definition: An "active shooter" is someone actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, often implying the use of firearms. The FBI doesn’t strictly define "mass shooting" but often uses a threshold of four or more killed in a single incident, excluding the shooter, for "mass murder" with firearms.
  
  
  
• Gun Violence Archive (GVA): Defines a mass shooting as an incident where four or more people (excluding the shooter) are shot, whether injured or killed, in a single event at roughly the same time and location.
  
  
  
  
  

• Congressional Research Service (CRS): Focuses on "public mass shootings" with four or more killed in a public place, excluding gang-related violence, criminal profit motives, or terrorism.
  
  
  
• Everytown for Gun Safety: Defines it as four or more people shot and killed, excluding the shooter.
  
  
  
• Mother Jones: Uses a stricter definition, requiring three or more fatalities in a public place since 2013 (previously four).
  
  

The "four or more shot in a single episode" definition aligns with the GVA’s broader criteria, which includes both injuries and fatalities. This is one of the most commonly cited definitions in media but isn’t universally accepted, as others focus only on fatalities or exclude certain motives (e.g., gang violence).Are All Mass Shooters Republican?No, this claim is demonstrably false. Data on mass shooters’ political affiliations is spotty because it’s rarely a primary focus of investigations, and many shooters don’t explicitly state political motives. However, available evidence shows a range of affiliations or no clear political alignment at all:

• Examples of Diverse Affiliations:
  • Chris Harper Mercer (2015, Umpqua Community College, Oregon): A dating profile indicated he was a Republican, but no deeper evidence confirms this as a motive.
    
    
    
  • James Thomas Hodgkinson (2017, congressional baseball game shooting, Virginia): Volunteered for Democrat Bernie Sanders’ campaign and targeted Republicans, showing a clear left-leaning affiliation.
    
    
    
  • Stephen Paddock (2017, Las Vegas shooting): No clear political affiliation was established; his motives remain largely unknown.
    
    
    
  • Audrey Elizabeth Hale (2023, Nashville school shooting): Identified as transgender, with no definitive Republican affiliation reported.
    
    
• General Trends: Studies, like those from The Violence Project, show that mass shooters are overwhelmingly male (97.7%) and often motivated by personal grievances, trauma, or crises rather than clear political ideologies. Only 21.6% of shooters studied past mass shooters, and motivations like domestic violence (27.9%) or workplace issues are more common than partisan agendas. Political ideology, when present, can cut across party lines (e.g., anti-government, racial, or religious extremism) and isn’t exclusively tied to Republican or Democratic affiliations.
  
  
  
  

A 2018 PolitiFact article debunked a similar claim by Rep. Claudia Tenney, who suggested many mass shooters were Democrats. Experts like James Alan Fox and Katherine Ramsland emphasized that political motives are rare, and personal vendettas or mental health issues are far more common drivers. No comprehensive data supports the claim that all, or even most, mass shooters align with any single political party.


Recent Statistics

• Gun Violence Archive (2020-2021): Recorded 611 mass shootings in 2020 and 693 in 2021, with a broad definition (four or more shot). No political affiliation data is systematically tracked, but the sheer volume suggests diverse perpetrators.
  
  
  
• The Violence Project (1966-2022): Documented 185 mass shootings (four or more killed in public). Of these, 97.7% were male, with racial demographics roughly mirroring the U.S. population (52.3% White, 20.9% Black, 8.1% Latino, etc.). Political affiliation wasn’t a primary focus, but no evidence suggests a Republican monopoly.
  
  
  
  
  
• Statista (1982-2024): Noted 145 mass shootings by male shooters, with 54% by White perpetrators, 17% Black, and 8% Latino. Political affiliations weren’t detailed, but the data doesn’t support a single-party trend.
  
  

Why the Claim Falls Apart

• Lack of Data: Most mass shooting investigations don’t prioritize political affiliation, as it’s often irrelevant to the motive. Claiming "all" shooters are Republican ignores the absence of systematic political data.
• Diverse Motives: Shooters are often driven by personal issues (e.g., domestic violence, workplace grudges) or non-partisan ideologies (e.g., racial hatred, as with Dylann Roof, or anti-government sentiment).
  
  
  
  
  
• Cherry-Picking: Anecdotal cases can be found for any group, but broad claims like this rely on selective examples without statistical backing.
• Polarization Bias: Such claims often stem from online echo chambers, where users exaggerate to push narratives. X posts, for instance, show polarized takes on gun violence, with some blaming specific groups without evidence.

ConclusionThe idea that "ALL mass shooters" are Republican is baseless and contradicts available data. Mass shooters have varied or unclear political affiliations, and their actions are more often tied to personal, psychological, or social factors than partisan politics. The definition of a mass shooting varies, but the GVA’s "four or more shot" threshold is widely used, though stricter definitions (e.g., four or more killed) exist. Without comprehensive data tying political affiliation to mass shootings, any blanket claim like this is pure speculation. If you want to dig deeper into specific cases or datasets, let me know!

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Let's examine this latest mass shooting in Minneapolis. The shooter was a Tranny who hated Trump, was virulently Anti-Christian, Anti-Jewish, Pro Hamas, hated Israel, Pro Intifada and clearly hated anything that smacked of traditional America or American values. In other words, a fairly typical Dim voter who would support a Mamdani or AOC all day long.

The evil and hatred that consumed this sick asshole is beyond belief.


So, it begs the question: How would the legacy media cover such an event? Well, since it was one of their own, it is not about a Tranny, Trump and America hating Anti-Christian, Jew hating sick asshole. It's about gun violence. Yep....the guns made him do it. And if any of you mention that this boy was a mentally ill sexual deviant, then weep for the poor oppressed Tranny community, and you are a bigot. Now it the shooter was not associated with the far-Left wing like this guy, well it is not about guns, it's about the evils of Maga. See how that goes? The hypocrisy is stunning.

No concern expressed for Catholics. No mention it was a hate crime. No mention that the Tranny asshole deliberately targeted young children attending a mass. Nope, it was the guns and a poor misunderstood Tranny victim.

And the mainstream media wonders why no one believes them anymore and tunes them out.


Discuss.

Some of us have been calling out SSRI for years

It's always there with mass shooters