For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

[22lcidw]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

What a load of crap.. but it is American Thinker after all.

Our competitive level says different.

 

[surada]

Equity is concerned with fairness and social justice and aims to focus on a concern for people’s needs, instead of providing services that reach the greatest number of people. The equity paradigm promotes investing in the transmission of services to people who need them most.
Equity and Social Justice: A short introduction
www.equityforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FinalPaper-EquityandSocia…

Fairness/social justice = discrimination against able bodied heterosexual white males.

Didn't you go to college?

 

[JustAGuy1]

Equity is concerned with fairness and social justice and aims to focus on a concern for people’s needs, instead of providing services that reach the greatest number of people. The equity paradigm promotes investing in the transmission of services to people who need them most.
Equity and Social Justice: A short introduction
www.equityforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FinalPaper-EquityandSocia…

Get another job if you want more money dumbass. If you're flipping burgers that's your own damn fault.

Who are you talking to?

These are the same folks who claim to be for the working man and are anti-establishment...

Yet all they do is worship the wealth class and parrot the same BS tropes that the establishment has taught them

All the "establishment" has taught me is is that anyone stuck in the binary political system needs a real education.

 

[AMart]

Equity is concerned with fairness and social justice and aims to focus on a concern for people’s needs, instead of providing services that reach the greatest number of people. The equity paradigm promotes investing in the transmission of services to people who need them most.
Equity and Social Justice: A short introduction
www.equityforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FinalPaper-EquityandSocia…

Fairness/social justice = discrimination against able bodied heterosexual white males.

Didn't you go to college?

Did you?

 

[JustAGuy1]

In today's episode of Trumper's not understanding what words mean.......


Here is a sport's analogy for those who don't understand equity.....

Let's say 2 teams are playing a game of football....both teams are playing by what we have been told are the same rules.....It's the 4th quarter and one team is ahead by 50 points with 1 minute to go......then we find out the losing team inherited 100 points and wins the game.......since both teams played by the same rules, it may appear fair -- but it definitely wasn't equitable....

"Equity" is the new word for greed. You want what isn't yours.

 

[Dragonlady]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

More right wing garbage and conspiracy theories from the American Stinker: This website doesn't disclose its ownership and seems to be in the business of sewing distrust and false stories about the Administration designed to promote anti-American propaganda.

• Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[surada]

Equity is concerned with fairness and social justice and aims to focus on a concern for people’s needs, instead of providing services that reach the greatest number of people. The equity paradigm promotes investing in the transmission of services to people who need them most.
Equity and Social Justice: A short introduction
www.equityforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FinalPaper-EquityandSocia…

Fairness/social justice = discrimination against able bodied heterosexual white males.

Didn't you go to college?

Did you?

Yep.. and I still had to compete for jobs..

 

[JustAGuy1]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

More right wing garbage and conspiracy theories from the American Stinker: This website doesn't disclose its ownership and seems to be in the business of sewing distrust and false stories about the Administration designed to promote anti-American propaganda.

• Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You get more stupid with each passing day.

"The President has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity for all Americans. I’m leading this effort out of the Domestic Policy Council. I have assembled a first-rate team to drive this agenda forward. We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity for families across America.

I have the support of every White House office and every agency in this work, because as President Biden has made clear, advancing equity is everybody’s job."

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki and Domestic Policy Advisor Susan Rice, January 26, 2021 | The White House

 

[JustAGuy1]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

More right wing garbage and conspiracy theories from the American Stinker: This website doesn't disclose its ownership and seems to be in the business of sewing distrust and false stories about the Administration designed to promote anti-American propaganda.

• Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

More?

"Today, President Biden will deliver a national address on his plans to advance racial justice and equity, starting with an equitable and inclusive recovery. President Biden will renew the federal government’s commitment to making the American Dream real for families across the nation by taking ambitious steps to redress inequality in our economy and expand opportunity for communities that have been left behind, including communities of color."

 

[BluesLegend]

Not our problem. Dems riot, burn, loot Dem cities in Dem run states. Apparently they are dens of racist oppression, let the Dems clean up their mess.

 

[surada]

The Cascading Stupidity of Binary Politics

“Make America Great Again” “Forward Together” “A Future to Believe In” “I’m With Her” “Keep America Great” “For Everyone” “Not me. Us” Those are some of the more prominent campaigns slogans from the past two presidential election cycles. But while some of them have proven more effective than...

bernardgoldberg.com

Americans, but especially conservatives, used to mock the notion of American royalty. We embraced individualism and self-governance and understood that we elected leaders to serve us, not the other way around.

But that’s not how things largely operate today, at least within the Republican party. Binary politics have ushered in a culture of unquestioning loyalty to the party’s leader. It’s that loyalty, not policies or platforms, that holds the base together.

As for those Republicans, conservatives, and other center-right individuals who won’t pledge allegiance to their royal leader? Well they’re guilty of “betrayal,” of course! And even worse: they’re aiding the enemy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

Lying dicks. "More equity" does not mean Marxism or communism. Damn we are a country full of lying morons.

 

[JustAGuy1]

The Cascading Stupidity of Binary Politics

“Make America Great Again” “Forward Together” “A Future to Believe In” “I’m With Her” “Keep America Great” “For Everyone” “Not me. Us” Those are some of the more prominent campaigns slogans from the past two presidential election cycles. But while some of them have proven more effective than...

bernardgoldberg.com

Americans, but especially conservatives, used to mock the notion of American royalty. We embraced individualism and self-governance and understood that we elected leaders to serve us, not the other way around.

But that’s not how things largely operate today, at least within the Republican party. Binary politics have ushered in a culture of unquestioning loyalty to the party’s leader. It’s that loyalty, not policies or platforms, that holds the base together.

As for those Republicans, conservatives, and other center-right individuals who won’t pledge allegiance to their royal leader? Well they’re guilty of “betrayal,” of course! And even worse: they’re aiding the enemy.

Seriously? You guys are ALREADY suckling at Biden's dick.

 

[22lcidw]

The Cascading Stupidity of Binary Politics

“Make America Great Again” “Forward Together” “A Future to Believe In” “I’m With Her” “Keep America Great” “For Everyone” “Not me. Us” Those are some of the more prominent campaigns slogans from the past two presidential election cycles. But while some of them have proven more effective than...

bernardgoldberg.com

Americans, but especially conservatives, used to mock the notion of American royalty. We embraced individualism and self-governance and understood that we elected leaders to serve us, not the other way around.

But that’s not how things largely operate today, at least within the Republican party. Binary politics have ushered in a culture of unquestioning loyalty to the party’s leader. It’s that loyalty, not policies or platforms, that holds the base together.

As for those Republicans, conservatives, and other center-right individuals who won’t pledge allegiance to their royal leader? Well they’re guilty of “betrayal,” of course! And even worse: they’re aiding the enemy.

People woke up. Whether it makes a difference I do not know. But you guys are most obstinant and arrogant people around. You perpetually crap on people who are Republicans, real Democrats and Independents. Many of your voters do not even know what you are about. What the real goals are. And that when the clampdown comes, they will be stuck in any way of living in that moment. And then regress. If you do not think poverty areas can be worse, they can. People survived without government handouts at one time. Try eliminating that today and there will be a massive uprising. And always understand that the owners of the central banks can cut the cord anytime they want.

 

[Dragonlady]

Equity is concerned with fairness and social justice and aims to focus on a concern for people’s needs, instead of providing services that reach the greatest number of people. The equity paradigm promotes investing in the transmission of services to people who need them most.
Equity and Social Justice: A short introduction
www.equityforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FinalPaper-EquityandSocia…

Fairness/social justice = discrimination against able bodied heterosexual white males.

Oh the whiny white male. That poor underpriveleged, under appreciated, guy. Suddenly he has to compete on an equal playing field with women, and minorities!!!! Of the horror of it.

 

[Lesh]

More word salad.

All they're saying is

"I WANT MY TRUMP BACK...HE MADE ME FEEL GOOD!!!!"

 

[surada]

The Cascading Stupidity of Binary Politics

“Make America Great Again” “Forward Together” “A Future to Believe In” “I’m With Her” “Keep America Great” “For Everyone” “Not me. Us” Those are some of the more prominent campaigns slogans from the past two presidential election cycles. But while some of them have proven more effective than...

bernardgoldberg.com

Americans, but especially conservatives, used to mock the notion of American royalty. We embraced individualism and self-governance and understood that we elected leaders to serve us, not the other way around.

But that’s not how things largely operate today, at least within the Republican party. Binary politics have ushered in a culture of unquestioning loyalty to the party’s leader. It’s that loyalty, not policies or platforms, that holds the base together.

As for those Republicans, conservatives, and other center-right individuals who won’t pledge allegiance to their royal leader? Well they’re guilty of “betrayal,” of course! And even worse: they’re aiding the enemy.

People woke up. Whether it makes a difference I do not know. But you guys are most obstinant and arrogant people around. You perpetually crap on people who are Republicans, real Democrats and Independents. Many of your voters do not even know what you are about. What the real goals are. And that when the clampdown comes, they will be stuck in any way of living in that moment. And then regress. If you do not think poverty areas can be worse, they can. People survived without government handouts at one time. Try eliminating that today and there will be a massive uprising. And always understand that the owners of the central banks can cut the cord anytime they want.

Do you think a shrinking middle class is good for the country?

 

[Doc7505]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

What a load of crap.. but it is American Thinker after all.

~~~~~~~
Typical... when Lrfty assholes can't find a method to respond to a logic statement they attempt to kill the messenger.

 

[toobfreak]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

 

[Doc7505]

For Democrats, Equality Is No Longer Good Enough. We Need Marxist 'Equity.'

For Democrats, equality is no longer good enough. We need Marxist 'equity.' - American Thinker
30 Jan 2021 ~~ By D. Lewis


At a White House briefing last week, Susan Rice said, "The president has committed the whole of our government to advancing racial justice and equity[.] ... We will hold the federal government accountable for advancing equity ... Every agency will place equity at the core [of its programs[.]"
According to the dictionary, equity is "freedom from bias or favoritism." However, the "social justice" definition of equity is the opposite. It holds that to be equal, people must be treated differently. "Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances."
This idea of equity comes from identifiably communist thought. It is the second part of Marx's slogan: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Lenin, discussing Marx, said, "Every right is an application of the same measures to different people who, in fact, are not the same and are not equal to one another; this is why "equal right" is really a violation of equality and an injustice[.] ... [D]ifferent people are not alike; one is strong, another is weak, one is married, the other is not, one has more children[.] ... [quoting Marx] 'In order to avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, must be unequal'" (State and Revolution, Chapter 5, Part 3).
~Snip~
No nation or system of government is perfect, but the idea of equality has done far more for people than the idea of equity and its lamentable history. This equality is not the kind that equity can never have; it is what every citizen already has. This equality takes into account the imperfections of the human way of operating by allowing for free thought, free speech, control over whom they elect, and an adversarial system of government where opposition and debate are the norm. It is this equality that is at the core of the Constitution and which should be at the core of every agency, not the equity Susan Rice espouses.

Comment:
Under this Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie idea, everyone ends up in poverty except to the entitled ruling class who see themselves as gods over the dirty masses.
Again quoting the genius of Orwell "Animal Farm":

'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' ​

The bad news for the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats and RINOs is that congress is split. The US Senate is 50/50; the vice president is the Ds only edge. The US House of Representatives is 221D/211 and maybe 1 less D shortly; this would leave only a 9 vote majority in a House with 435 representatives. So for all intents and purposes, this is a razor thin majority.
And so far, some of the Ds have been squawking, fearful for their reelections. So it's not like the Marxists have a clear path for their agenda through Congress.

View attachment 450761​

More right wing garbage and conspiracy theories from the American Stinker: This website doesn't disclose its ownership and seems to be in the business of sewing distrust and false stories about the Administration designed to promote anti-American propaganda.

• Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

~~~~~~

Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

“Media Bias Fact Check,” a media outlet that claims to be “dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices,” is either inept or dishonest.

www.justfactsdaily.com

********​

'Media Bias/Fact Check' Site Served With Cease And Desist, Gets Fact-Checked

The discredited ‘fact-checker’ MEDIA BIAS/FACT CHECK was served with a ‘cease-and-desist’ for publishing unsubstantiated and defamatory claims.

climatechangedispatch.com