For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[bendog]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

Was that a yes or a no?

 

[toxicmedia]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

Liberals fathom the positions righties express all the time.

Righties can't fathom that their positions might not be the best.

It's really easy to say that anyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't understand you.

In the last 3 Presidential elections, this one included...the problem is that Liberals are/have been understanding EXACTLY what Conservative candidates have been saying

 

[james bond]

History shows N-word created by Democrats. The racists are in their party.

1885 illustration from Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, captioned "Misto Bradish's n*gger"

"There is a direct and strong link between the word ****** and anti-black caricatures. Although ****** has been used to refer to any person of known African ancestry.2 it is usually directed against blacks who supposedly have certain negative characteristics. The Coon caricature, for example, portrays black men as lazy, ignorant, and obsessively self-indulgent; these are also traits historically represented by the word ******. The Brute caricature depicts black men as angry, physically strong, animalistic, and prone to wanton violence. This depiction is also implied in the word ******. The Tom and Mammy caricatures are often portrayed as kind, loving "friends" of whites. They are also presented as intellectually childlike, physically unattractive, and neglectful of their biological families. These latter traits have been associated with blacks, generally, and are implied in the word ******. The word ****** was a shorthand way of saying that blacks possessed the moral, intellectual, social, and physical characteristics of the Coon, Brute, Tom, Mammy, and other racial caricatures."

JCM: ****** and Caricature

Do you know what year it is?

It's an election year. And the racists are still in the Democratic Party. Was that so hard?

 

[james bond]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

>>If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?<<

Sure. The Democrats were against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

 

[bendog]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

Was that a yes or a no?

It is "one can believe that the prohibitions on racial discrimination in private contracts should not have been constitutional, and one can still not be a racist."

It does not mean the gop can be absolved of the racist attacks against the potus that the gop chose not to condemn for the past 8 years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

History shows N-word created by Democrats. The racists are in their party.

1885 illustration from Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, captioned "Misto Bradish's n*gger"

"There is a direct and strong link between the word ****** and anti-black caricatures. Although ****** has been used to refer to any person of known African ancestry.2 it is usually directed against blacks who supposedly have certain negative characteristics. The Coon caricature, for example, portrays black men as lazy, ignorant, and obsessively self-indulgent; these are also traits historically represented by the word ******. The Brute caricature depicts black men as angry, physically strong, animalistic, and prone to wanton violence. This depiction is also implied in the word ******. The Tom and Mammy caricatures are often portrayed as kind, loving "friends" of whites. They are also presented as intellectually childlike, physically unattractive, and neglectful of their biological families. These latter traits have been associated with blacks, generally, and are implied in the word ******. The word ****** was a shorthand way of saying that blacks possessed the moral, intellectual, social, and physical characteristics of the Coon, Brute, Tom, Mammy, and other racial caricatures."

JCM: ****** and Caricature

Do you know what year it is?

It's an election year. And the racists are still in the Democratic Party. Was that so hard?

Really? Who are the Democrats who currently oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Voting Rights Act of 1965?

 

[rightwinger]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

>>If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?<<

Sure. The Democrats were against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

It never would have passed without LBJ

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

Was that a yes or a no?

It is "one can believe that the prohibitions on racial discrimination in private contracts should not have been constitutional, and one can still not be a racist."

It does not mean the gop can be absolved of the racist attacks against the potus that the gop chose not to condemn for the past 8 years.

If 'all men are created equal', and governments are formed to secure such rights as equality,

how does it get to be unconstitutional for the government of the United States to take as part of its prerogatives to secure the equal rights of minorities?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The GOP racist ? nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

 

[james bond]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

>>If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?<<

Sure. The Democrats were against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

It never would have passed without LBJ

Ha ha. It never would have passed without MLK who voted Republican.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

>>If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?<<

Sure. The Democrats were against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

No actually most of them weren't. And a Democrat signed the bill into law.

 

[kaz]

The term racism is a watered down interpretation and excuse used by liberals when a candidate or party does not agree with the liberal's ideological view and interpretation for the role of government. When a conservative speaks out who happens to be African American, this whole discussion of "it's the GOP that's the party of racists" roaring it's ugly head becomes so laughable that I simply can't take anything the liberals have to say on the subject seriously. How you act accordingly to THOSE African Americans, who only happens to share a different political perspective, speaks a lot towards your views and interpretation of racism.

What's particularly pathetic about the race whores like Jillian is there is actual racism in the world and their endless quest to label anyone who disagrees with them a racist just overwhelmingly dulls the use of the word to background noise and actually protects actual racists

Well if you believe in the respect of our federal immigration laws through enforcement, you are considered a racist.

When you present them with the real world "reality" of the kind of people that are behind these terrorists attacks. As well as present them with where their strongholds and training camps reside, with the common sense approach as to why you simply don't open your doors to refugees in regions where the threat terrorists thrives, you are called a racist.

It's just the kind of games that liberals play, when you just don't agree with their views on the issues and they simply can't get their way.

we have been deporting people. the numbers of people coming in has been flat for ages.

the games are yours. if you don't like the labels you get, stop nominating people who call mexicans rapists, a latina beauty queen "miss housekeeping" (which doesn't even begin to touch on the disgusting things your orange loser says about women) and stop cheering every time black kids get killed.

now go pretend that you don't vote for bigoted policies. in normal society, a man who re-tweets white supremacists wouldn't even be considered acceptable to have lunch with, much less represent this country to the world.

the bigger joke is that your ilk doesn't care if your electoral system is hacked by putin. how much must you hate your country.

Again the flat out lie that Trump called "mexicans rapists." He said rapists come across the border from Mexico, which is true and an entirely different thing.

This is how you prove what a political slut you are. If Trump was really what you say, you'd say the truth. But lies like this prove you are to be ignored. It actually defends Trump because you kill all your credibility and nothing you say is to be believed

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

Did you watch it, moron? Apparently not.

"some are rapists, some are murderers ... and some are good people."

Exactly what I said. The first part was even the caption on the video.

Suggestion, write a note to self, before you post a video ... WATCH IT.

Gawd you're an imbecile

 

[NYcarbineer]

History shows N-word created by Democrats. The racists are in their party.

1885 illustration from Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, captioned "Misto Bradish's n*gger"

"There is a direct and strong link between the word ****** and anti-black caricatures. Although ****** has been used to refer to any person of known African ancestry.2 it is usually directed against blacks who supposedly have certain negative characteristics. The Coon caricature, for example, portrays black men as lazy, ignorant, and obsessively self-indulgent; these are also traits historically represented by the word ******. The Brute caricature depicts black men as angry, physically strong, animalistic, and prone to wanton violence. This depiction is also implied in the word ******. The Tom and Mammy caricatures are often portrayed as kind, loving "friends" of whites. They are also presented as intellectually childlike, physically unattractive, and neglectful of their biological families. These latter traits have been associated with blacks, generally, and are implied in the word ******. The word ****** was a shorthand way of saying that blacks possessed the moral, intellectual, social, and physical characteristics of the Coon, Brute, Tom, Mammy, and other racial caricatures."

JCM: ****** and Caricature

The word '******' has roots long before there was any such thing as a Democratic Party.

 

[rightwinger]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

>>If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?<<

Sure. The Democrats were against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

It never would have passed without LBJ

Ha ha. It never would have passed without MLK who voted Republican.

MLKs father was a Republican

MLK supported JFK in 1960 and was adamantly opposed to Goldwater in 1964

 

[rightwinger]

What's particularly pathetic about the race whores like Jillian is there is actual racism in the world and their endless quest to label anyone who disagrees with them a racist just overwhelmingly dulls the use of the word to background noise and actually protects actual racists

Well if you believe in the respect of our federal immigration laws through enforcement, you are considered a racist.

When you present them with the real world "reality" of the kind of people that are behind these terrorists attacks. As well as present them with where their strongholds and training camps reside, with the common sense approach as to why you simply don't open your doors to refugees in regions where the threat terrorists thrives, you are called a racist.

It's just the kind of games that liberals play, when you just don't agree with their views on the issues and they simply can't get their way.

we have been deporting people. the numbers of people coming in has been flat for ages.

the games are yours. if you don't like the labels you get, stop nominating people who call mexicans rapists, a latina beauty queen "miss housekeeping" (which doesn't even begin to touch on the disgusting things your orange loser says about women) and stop cheering every time black kids get killed.

now go pretend that you don't vote for bigoted policies. in normal society, a man who re-tweets white supremacists wouldn't even be considered acceptable to have lunch with, much less represent this country to the world.

the bigger joke is that your ilk doesn't care if your electoral system is hacked by putin. how much must you hate your country.

Again the flat out lie that Trump called "mexicans rapists." He said rapists come across the border from Mexico, which is true and an entirely different thing.

This is how you prove what a political slut you are. If Trump was really what you say, you'd say the truth. But lies like this prove you are to be ignored. It actually defends Trump because you kill all your credibility and nothing you say is to be believed

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

Did you watch it, moron? Apparently not.

"some are rapists, some are murderers ... and some are good people."

Exactly what I said. The first part was even the caption on the video.

Suggestion, write a note to self, before you post a video ... WATCH IT.

Gawd you're an imbecile

You even managed to screw up a direct quote

The word "some" was only applied to good people

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Ha ha. It never would have passed without MLK who voted Republican.

(CNN)The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. He opposed affirmative action. He grew so radical near the end of his life that he considered renouncing nonviolence.

Which of those statements are true?
None of them. They're all bogus.
Debunking the biggest myths about MLK - CNN.com

 

[kaz]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

All the Constitution says is government cannot discriminate against blacks. It grants zero power to government to allow it to force citizens to not discriminate. Just like free speech. Government cannot prosecute you for your views. However, your employer can fire you for speaking them.

The whole idea that government can force citizens to deal with each other is an abomination to liberty. And the reality is it's virtually unnecessary. Businesses want customers. The color we care about is green.

I know, I know, but Jim Crow! Actually, Jim Crow, was government. Forcing citizens to not deal with each other was just as much an abomination to liberty as forcing us to deal with each other. Government should have no say

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Ha ha. It never would have passed without MLK who voted Republican.

 

[bendog]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

If you disagree with the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you believe your business should have the right to refuse service to blacks,

you would be a racist, wouldn't you?

Would you consider it racist for one to choose to contract with blacks, but at the same time believe the const should not have allowed the gvot the power to punish individuals who chose not to contract with blacks? That was Goldwater's belief.

edit, that said, it was racist of Donnie Two Tone to ride the Birther in Chief mantle for attention for 8 years.

Was that a yes or a no?

It is "one can believe that the prohibitions on racial discrimination in private contracts should not have been constitutional, and one can still not be a racist."

It does not mean the gop can be absolved of the racist attacks against the potus that the gop chose not to condemn for the past 8 years.

If 'all men are created equal', and governments are formed to secure such rights as equality,

how does it get to be unconstitutional for the government of the United States to take as part of its prerogatives to secure the equal rights of minorities?

We have no disagreement that governments cannot treat citizens differently because of any irrelevant differences based on race, belief, sexual orientation or gender.

We do have a disagreement on whether the fed govt should have had the power to prevent any person of any race deciding that he/she didn't want to contract with another person because of their race ... or belief, sexual orientation or gender. That is a black person, or even a gay person, had the right to be boorish, just as a white person did. Accepting that the Founders did not intend to make it illegal for people to be boorish or prejudiced in their own private dealings does not make one racist. Rather, it means that one believes the Founders believed that when ideas were freely debated and left open to being tested, the majority would reach the right decision. And Wal-Mart and Kentucky Fried would do away with segregated businesses.