For 8 years the right has been called racist.

The meme will not be changed to sexist....it will be changed to racist AND sexist



If you can't make the case for your policies based on their merits without calling your enemies names,

then you can't make the case for you policies based on their merits.


That means that you are on the wrong side of the issues.

people with whom you have political disagreements are only "enemies" to the white trash uneducated ......



Racist, pretentious d-bag.
Remember when Hillary said the gop was her enemy? What uneducated white trash she is eh....
Based on the actions of the GOP against her over the last 25 years.....why wouldn't they be the enemy?
poor hil a wee wee.
 
Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

The problem is that this card they keep using has enabled them to go completely off the deep end with their opinions. They are the regressives now. No need to actually think about any of the positions, just throw the racist/sexist/xenophobe card out there and you are golden.

And next, Germany is in ruins.
 
If you can't make the case for your policies based on their merits without calling your enemies names,

then you can't make the case for you policies based on their merits.


That means that you are on the wrong side of the issues.

people with whom you have political disagreements are only "enemies" to the white trash uneducated ......



Racist, pretentious d-bag.
Remember when Hillary said the gop was her enemy? What uneducated white trash she is eh....
Based on the actions of the GOP against her over the last 25 years.....why wouldn't they be the enemy?
poor hil a wee wee.
Ewe would feel the same if it happened to ewe
 
What is your view on the 230 point bonus blacks get in Ivy League College admissions?

Is that racism? To get special treatment for being a certain race?


Which party supports that?

Bump. Not a rhetorical question.


What is your view on the 230 point bonus blacks get in Ivy League College admissions?

Is that racism? To get special treatment for being a certain race?


Which party supports that?

What's your view on legacy admissions ? Which is basically white affirmative action .

I note you did not answer my question on which party supports a 230 point race based bonus.

But I will answer yours anyway.


1. Is it? I haven't seen any breakdown to support that claim.

2. The bonus from that is less than for black skin.

3. And no, it is not white affirmative action. A bonus given to that group does not help the average white kid applying for an university slot.

4. Legacy admission is limited to some university admissions. The Fear of lawsuits/affirmative action/multiculturalism/diversity/leftism paradigm that drives such anti-white discrimination is universal in our society.


Will you now address the 230 point bonus that black skin nets the ACTUAL Privileged Class for Ivy League Admissions?

I don't know about your 230 point thing but I'll answer your question .


It's been well documented. It is a statistical fact. Due to a number of motivating factors, Ivy League Colleges discriminate in favor of black students to the point of giving them an effective bonus of 230 points of SAT score.

This is race based discrimination in favor of blacks for a very important resource ie, Ivy League Educations.






And if ties into legacy .


It does not.


For almost their entire history Ivy's specially kept minorities out of their school. Meaning all their graduates were white . Meaning their white kids got accepted under legacy . The result is a white affirmative action .


That was not "white affirmative action". That was racism. And it was quite some time ago. YOu are punishing white people in the TEENS, for the sins of other people from generations ago.

That is morally indefensible.


So part of schools AA programs is to make up for past wrongs .


Got it. You believe that two wrongs make a right. I strongly disagree.



But there's a 2nd part. Schools want to provide an all around education for their students. Part of that is mixing them wh students from different backgrounds. (Race , nationality , regional ,economic background ) . So little Jonny blue blood who's never exposed to black People , finally gets a chance to mix wh someone different . Like he will have to do in the real world .

That is one of the justifications for the blatant anti-white discrimination. It is as is most rationalizations for racism, complete bs.


1. You assume that the whites being discriminated against are rich. This is not true. Rich students have parents with the resources to find their way. It is middle class and poor white who bear the brunt of this discrimination.

2. People do not have to have different skin color to have different cultures. That is a fallacy on the part of the racists who support this racist policy.

3. Being exposed to different cultures is not really educational. It might be "Cool" but there are very few educational fields where that really contributes.



The purpose is not to keep whites out .


An interesting claim. ANd one that is irrelevant to the young white students who's transcripts would have put them into Ivy League Schools except for their white skin.



Obviously since a big majority of the student body is white .




Not true as shown by this graph from 2011.


Ivy League - Wikipedia


According to this, non-hispanic whites are significantly underrepresented compared to their percentage of the US population.

AND mostly less than a majority of the student bodies.

There are a bunch of Asians in the ivy now .

If schools only chose by sat , you'd have a point . But they don't . There's all kinds of subjective criteria.

And u speak as if discrimination and racism has ended . It has not .
 
You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

I agree, and it only took 5 posts for a deplorable POS to show up.
 
Here's some examples for ya:

Remember the "you lie " outburst at the state of the union?

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/01/yes-the-republican-party-is-racist-and-heres-why/

It was a lie, had nothing to do with who told it. In fact you dear leader was later awarded liar of the year on the same subject. The ACA.

Blurting shit out at the state of the union is a no no . At least it was until the black guy became prez .

You righties can't see the racist forest for the racist trees .

I bet this really got you upset didn't it?

When George W. Bush claimed in his 2005 State of the Union that Social Security will be "exhausted and bankrupt by 2042," Democrats responded with boos.
 
Bump. Not a rhetorical question.


What is your view on the 230 point bonus blacks get in Ivy League College admissions?

Is that racism? To get special treatment for being a certain race?


Which party supports that?

What's your view on legacy admissions ? Which is basically white affirmative action .

I note you did not answer my question on which party supports a 230 point race based bonus.

But I will answer yours anyway.


1. Is it? I haven't seen any breakdown to support that claim.

2. The bonus from that is less than for black skin.

3. And no, it is not white affirmative action. A bonus given to that group does not help the average white kid applying for an university slot.

4. Legacy admission is limited to some university admissions. The Fear of lawsuits/affirmative action/multiculturalism/diversity/leftism paradigm that drives such anti-white discrimination is universal in our society.


Will you now address the 230 point bonus that black skin nets the ACTUAL Privileged Class for Ivy League Admissions?

I don't know about your 230 point thing but I'll answer your question .


It's been well documented. It is a statistical fact. Due to a number of motivating factors, Ivy League Colleges discriminate in favor of black students to the point of giving them an effective bonus of 230 points of SAT score.

This is race based discrimination in favor of blacks for a very important resource ie, Ivy League Educations.






And if ties into legacy .


It does not.


For almost their entire history Ivy's specially kept minorities out of their school. Meaning all their graduates were white . Meaning their white kids got accepted under legacy . The result is a white affirmative action .


That was not "white affirmative action". That was racism. And it was quite some time ago. YOu are punishing white people in the TEENS, for the sins of other people from generations ago.

That is morally indefensible.


So part of schools AA programs is to make up for past wrongs .


Got it. You believe that two wrongs make a right. I strongly disagree.



But there's a 2nd part. Schools want to provide an all around education for their students. Part of that is mixing them wh students from different backgrounds. (Race , nationality , regional ,economic background ) . So little Jonny blue blood who's never exposed to black People , finally gets a chance to mix wh someone different . Like he will have to do in the real world .

That is one of the justifications for the blatant anti-white discrimination. It is as is most rationalizations for racism, complete bs.


1. You assume that the whites being discriminated against are rich. This is not true. Rich students have parents with the resources to find their way. It is middle class and poor white who bear the brunt of this discrimination.

2. People do not have to have different skin color to have different cultures. That is a fallacy on the part of the racists who support this racist policy.

3. Being exposed to different cultures is not really educational. It might be "Cool" but there are very few educational fields where that really contributes.



The purpose is not to keep whites out .


An interesting claim. ANd one that is irrelevant to the young white students who's transcripts would have put them into Ivy League Schools except for their white skin.



Obviously since a big majority of the student body is white .




Not true as shown by this graph from 2011.


Ivy League - Wikipedia


According to this, non-hispanic whites are significantly underrepresented compared to their percentage of the US population.

AND mostly less than a majority of the student bodies.

There are a bunch of Asians in the ivy now .

If schools only chose by sat , you'd have a point . But they don't . There's all kinds of subjective criteria.

And u speak as if discrimination and racism has ended . It has not .
it sure has not. did you see those racist numbskulls at berekly discriminating against white students?
 
amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.


The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

The term racism is a watered down interpretation and excuse used by liberals when a candidate or party does not agree with the liberal's ideological view and interpretation for the role of government. When a conservative speaks out who happens to be African American, this whole discussion of "it's the GOP that's the party of racists" roaring it's ugly head becomes so laughable that I simply can't take anything the liberals have to say on the subject seriously. How you act accordingly to THOSE African Americans, who only happens to share a different political perspective, speaks a lot towards your views and interpretation of racism.

What's particularly pathetic about the race whores like Jillian is there is actual racism in the world and their endless quest to label anyone who disagrees with them a racist just overwhelmingly dulls the use of the word to background noise and actually protects actual racists

Well if you believe in the respect of our federal immigration laws through enforcement, you are considered a racist.

When you present them with the real world "reality" of the kind of people that are behind these terrorists attacks. As well as present them with where their strongholds and training camps reside, with the common sense approach as to why you simply don't open your doors to refugees in regions where the threat terrorists thrives, you are called a racist.

It's just the kind of games that liberals play, when you just don't agree with their views on the issues and they simply can't get their way.
 
Last edited:
It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.


The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

The term racism is a watered down interpretation and excuse used by liberals when a candidate or party does not agree with the liberal's ideological view and interpretation for the role of government. When a conservative speaks out who happens to be African American, this whole discussion of "it's the GOP that's the party of racists" roaring it's ugly head becomes so laughable that I simply can't take anything the liberals have to say on the subject seriously. How you act accordingly to THOSE African Americans, who only happens to share a different political perspective, speaks a lot towards your views and interpretation of racism.

What's particularly pathetic about the race whores like Jillian is there is actual racism in the world and their endless quest to label anyone who disagrees with them a racist just overwhelmingly dulls the use of the word to background noise and actually protects actual racists

Well if you believe in the respect of our federal immigration laws through enforcement, you are considered a racist.

When you present them with the real world "reality" of the kind of people that are behind these terrorists attacks. As well as present them with where their strongholds and training camps reside, with the common sense approach as to why you simply don't open your doors to refugees in regions where the threat terrorists thrives, you are called a racist.

It's just the kind of games that liberals play, when you just don't agree with their views on the issues and they simply can't get their way.

we have been deporting people. the numbers of people coming in has been flat for ages.

the games are yours. if you don't like the labels you get, stop nominating people who call mexicans rapists, a latina beauty queen "miss housekeeping" (which doesn't even begin to touch on the disgusting things your orange loser says about women) and stop cheering every time black kids get killed.

now go pretend that you don't vote for bigoted policies. in normal society, a man who re-tweets white supremacists wouldn't even be considered acceptable to have lunch with, much less represent this country to the world.

the bigger joke is that your ilk doesn't care if your electoral system is hacked by putin. how much must you hate your country.
 
Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

Insane ^^^

There is nothing liberal or violent about me or anyone reading the threads you post and concluding that you are way out of touch with reality. You make stuff up in your head and convince yourself that it is true, or lie.

The crazy right wing has shown to be (on this forum and at Trump rallies) biddable, sexist, racist, homophobic and misogynist.

The Right Wing supports Plutocrats and fears democracy, aka, WE The People.

Remember the Big Tent once claimed by the GOP? They dropped that fiction with the nomination of Trump. Bush claimed to be a "uniter", Trump is all about dividing the country in his quest for power.

The NYT printed the 281 people, places and things Trump has insulted on Twitter:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

Keep in mind the Bible and President Lincoln's speech on a house divided. And many of Trump's loyalists seek to end the founders Great Experiment, a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
 
Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

Insane ^^^

There is nothing liberal or violent about me or anyone reading the threads you post and concluding that you are way out of touch with reality. You make stuff up in your head and convince yourself that it is true, or lie.

The crazy right wing has shown to be (on this forum and at Trump rallies) biddable, sexist, racist, homophobic and misogynist.

The Right Wing supports Plutocrats and fears democracy, aka, WE The People.

Remember the Big Tent once claimed by the GOP? They dropped that fiction with the nomination of Trump. Bush claimed to be a "uniter", Trump is all about dividing the country in his quest for power.

The NYT printed the 281 people, places and things Trump has insulted on Twitter:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

Keep in mind the Bible and President Lincoln's speech on a house divided. And many of Trump's loyalists seek to end the founders Great Experiment, a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.
 
Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

Insane ^^^

There is nothing liberal or violent about me or anyone reading the threads you post and concluding that you are way out of touch with reality. You make stuff up in your head and convince yourself that it is true, or lie.

The crazy right wing has shown to be (on this forum and at Trump rallies) biddable, sexist, racist, homophobic and misogynist.

The Right Wing supports Plutocrats and fears democracy, aka, WE The People.

Remember the Big Tent once claimed by the GOP? They dropped that fiction with the nomination of Trump. Bush claimed to be a "uniter", Trump is all about dividing the country in his quest for power.

The NYT printed the 281 people, places and things Trump has insulted on Twitter:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

Keep in mind the Bible and President Lincoln's speech on a house divided. And many of Trump's loyalists seek to end the founders Great Experiment, a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump
 
Insane ^^^

There is nothing liberal or violent about me or anyone reading the threads you post and concluding that you are way out of touch with reality. You make stuff up in your head and convince yourself that it is true, or lie.

The crazy right wing has shown to be (on this forum and at Trump rallies) biddable, sexist, racist, homophobic and misogynist.

The Right Wing supports Plutocrats and fears democracy, aka, WE The People.

Remember the Big Tent once claimed by the GOP? They dropped that fiction with the nomination of Trump. Bush claimed to be a "uniter", Trump is all about dividing the country in his quest for power.

The NYT printed the 281 people, places and things Trump has insulted on Twitter:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

Keep in mind the Bible and President Lincoln's speech on a house divided. And many of Trump's loyalists seek to end the founders Great Experiment, a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump

No, The Establishment's disdain for common people gave us Trump.
 
Insane ^^^

There is nothing liberal or violent about me or anyone reading the threads you post and concluding that you are way out of touch with reality. You make stuff up in your head and convince yourself that it is true, or lie.

The crazy right wing has shown to be (on this forum and at Trump rallies) biddable, sexist, racist, homophobic and misogynist.

The Right Wing supports Plutocrats and fears democracy, aka, WE The People.

Remember the Big Tent once claimed by the GOP? They dropped that fiction with the nomination of Trump. Bush claimed to be a "uniter", Trump is all about dividing the country in his quest for power.

The NYT printed the 281 people, places and things Trump has insulted on Twitter:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

Keep in mind the Bible and President Lincoln's speech on a house divided. And many of Trump's loyalists seek to end the founders Great Experiment, a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump
Even if 20% are racist douchebags they ARE AMERICANS. The ones Trump supposedly insults by & large are not.
 
ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump

No, The Establishment's disdain for common people gave us Trump.

Trump supporters are not common people....they are low information voters
 
On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump

No, The Establishment's disdain for common people gave us Trump.

Trump supporters are not common people....they are low information voters

Your disdain for your fellow citizens is noted, as is your undeserved and unearned sense of superiority.
 
ZOMG HE INSULTED PEOPLE ON TWITTER!!!!

On Twitter alone, now let's add the billion or so Muslims, millions of Mexicans, countless women, liberals, judges and justices, journalists, in fact the media in general. Each group and individual a member of each group insulted in his stump speech, off the cuff comments and let's not forget all the women he groped.

Well those people all need to "nut up".

Hillary insults 2nd amendment supporters daily when she claims she supports it herself.
Trump insults some illegals or Muslims and world's collide. Hillary insults half or more of America and liberals are suddenly deaf dumb & BLIND.

Hillary insulted the 20% who are Deplorables

The 20% who hate government, believe conspiracy theories, are bigots and mistrust everyone

They more than deserve the insult....They gave us Trump
Even if 20% are racist douchebags they ARE AMERICANS. The ones Trump supposedly insults by & large are not.

Women ARE AMERICANS
The Khan family ARE AMERICANS
The Handicapped ARE AMERICANS
The Mexican-American judge was BORN IN THE USA
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom