For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[HnL]

Particularly when you impersonate dead people, or those you know aren't going to vote.

Your state knows who the dead people are, idiot.
And how the hell does someone know if a voter isn't going to vote. Or if he or she already cast an absentee ballot?
Or how do they know the poll worker who checks them in doesn't know the voter personally?
Why would someone risk a felony conviction and many years in prison for something so risky for ONE vote, which won't matter regardless.

 

[HnL]

Why do you keep addressing your Nazi overlords?
Are you denying that we have significant racism now, and even more in the recent past, against black Americans?

It sounds like you are.

I'm pointing out that you are a mindless demagogue who slanders and libels those who are identified as enemies of your shameful party.

And yeah, that does make you a fucking scumbag..

I don't have a party, dumbass.
I am just tired of stupid white people.
It is time to wake the fuck up.

If I said I was tired of "stupid black people" you would say that was racist so how the fuck is your statement any different? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Dumbfuck

The difference is that I am white. Please show me the time when whites have had a serious and no holds barred discussion amongst ourselves about racial oppression.

We have heard what black ought to do to shore up their communities. But we are not black. So it is pretty easy to point to others and say what they ought to do. But it is much harder to do the same in our own houses.

Are you insane?

We whites have been split and fighting over racial oppression since this nation was founded.

You remember the Civil War, where millions of white US citizens fought and killed their fellow white US citizens over the issue?

YOu don't want a discussion.

You want to shout down any opposition with loud lies of racism.

A war isn't a discussion, dumbass.

 

[Rustic]

Particularly when you impersonate dead people, or those you know aren't going to vote.

Your state knows who the dead people are, idiot.
And how the hell does someone know if a voter isn't going to vote. Or if he or she already cast an absentee ballot?
Or how do they know the poll worker who checks them in doesn't know the voter personally?
Why would someone risk a felony conviction and many years in prison for something so risky for ONE vote, which won't matter regardless.

Just ask tom Daschle, he got voted in multiple terms from dead Indian votes/multiple votes from the same people...
Voter Fraud Wanders Off the Reservation

It's always paid off well for him being a crooked son of a bitch...lol
Daschle is officially a lobbyist now

 

[HnL]

Your hatred has made you irrational. Nature - apparently - made you stupid.

No, unearned white privilege has made white Texans overwhelmingly stupid and blind.

How's the kool-aid today?

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

 

[HnL]

White privilege in a time when black skin nets you a 230 point bonus in Ivy League College admissions.

Your claims are utter nonsense.

YOU and yours are the demagogues.

The Ivy League is a private organization.
Idlehour Country Club in Lexington, Kentucky gave blacks and Jews a big fat zero the entire time I lived there.
Did you ever complain about that?

 

[HnL]

Your hatred has made you irrational. Nature - apparently - made you stupid.

No, unearned white privilege has made white Texans overwhelmingly stupid and blind.

Because they disagree with you?

Tell me again about how open minded libs are.

They're open minded about you agreeing with them

We don't coddle Holocaust deniers. We call them antisemitic. We call them racists.

We do that because Holocaust denial is insane.

It is also insane to deny the devastation of our racist past, which easily extends to my lifetime. And it is insane to assert that has magically vanished recently.

So we ought to call people who deny this glaringly obvious problem racists, too.

We don't need to be open-minded about stone cold facts.

 

[kaz]

Your hatred has made you irrational. Nature - apparently - made you stupid.

No, unearned white privilege has made white Texans overwhelmingly stupid and blind.

How's the kool-aid today?

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

Democrats dominated the State most of the last 130 years, genius, so you admit you're racist?

 

[kaz]

Your hatred has made you irrational. Nature - apparently - made you stupid.

No, unearned white privilege has made white Texans overwhelmingly stupid and blind.

Because they disagree with you?

Tell me again about how open minded libs are.

They're open minded about you agreeing with them

We don't coddle Holocaust deniers. We call them antisemitic. We call them racists.

We do that because Holocaust denial is insane.

It is also insane to deny the devastation of our racist past, which easily extends to my lifetime. And it is insane to assert that has magically vanished recently.

So we ought to call people who deny this glaringly obvious problem racists, too.

We don't need to be open-minded about stone cold facts.

Who is denying the Holocaust? Again demonstrating your demagoguery over substance. And Democrats are the death to Israel party

 

[rightwinger]

Your hatred has made you irrational. Nature - apparently - made you stupid.

No, unearned white privilege has made white Texans overwhelmingly stupid and blind.

Because they disagree with you?

Tell me again about how open minded libs are.

They're open minded about you agreeing with them

We don't coddle Holocaust deniers. We call them antisemitic. We call them racists.

We do that because Holocaust denial is insane.

It is also insane to deny the devastation of our racist past, which easily extends to my lifetime. And it is insane to assert that has magically vanished recently.

So we ought to call people who deny this glaringly obvious problem racists, too.

We don't need to be open-minded about stone cold facts.

Who is denying the Holocaust? Again demonstrating your demagoguery over substance. And Democrats are the death to Israel party

Netanyahu is the death to Israel

 

[HnL]

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

Democrats dominated the State most of the last 130 years, genius, so you admit you're racist?

Sorry, your insane fucked up excuse is so insane that it is worse than Holocaust denial in its profound racism. Your party has taken up the banner of racism, and you know it.

It is self evident.
The Democratic president PUSHED for the civil right act and SIGNED the civil rights act. And then, the Republicans NOMINATED Barry Goldwater a few months after it was signed. Barry Goldwater’s claim to fame was his opposition to the civil rights act. And all the RACIST whites in the south—registered Democrats—voted for him. He only won the Deep South States and his home state of Arizona.

The racist scum DIVORCED the Democratic Party in 1964 and had an affair with the GOP until 2008, when the Democratic Party nominated a black man. So then, the GOP and the most disgusting racists had a big public wedding.

The END.

 

[HnL]

Who is denying the Holocaust? Again demonstrating your demagoguery over substance. And Democrats are the death to Israel party

You. You are denying the Holocaust of blacks in the United States over the past 400 years.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

Democrats dominated the State most of the last 130 years, genius, so you admit you're racist?

Sorry, your insane fucked up excuse is so insane that it is worse than Holocaust denial in its profound racism. Your party has taken up the banner of racism, and you know it.

It is self evident.
The Democratic president PUSHED for the civil right act and SIGNED the civil rights act. And then, the Republicans NOMINATED Barry Goldwater a few months after it was signed. Barry Goldwater’s claim to fame was his opposition to the civil rights act. And all the RACIST whites in the south—registered Democrats—voted for him. He only won the Deep South States and his home state of Arizona.

The racist scum DIVORCED the Democratic Party in 1964 and had an affair with the GOP until 2008, when the Democratic Party nominated a black man. So then, the GOP and the most disgusting racists had a big public wedding.

The END.

You will confuse kaz and the other of his ilk with the truth.

 

[kaz]

Who is denying the Holocaust? Again demonstrating your demagoguery over substance. And Democrats are the death to Israel party

You. You are denying the Holocaust of blacks in the United States over the past 400 years.

Does the nurse know you're using the computer?

 

[kaz]

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

Democrats dominated the State most of the last 130 years, genius, so you admit you're racist?

Sorry, your insane fucked up excuse is so insane that it is worse than Holocaust denial in its profound racism. Your party has taken up the banner of racism, and you know it.

It is self evident.
The Democratic president PUSHED for the civil right act and SIGNED the civil rights act. And then, the Republicans NOMINATED Barry Goldwater a few months after it was signed. Barry Goldwater’s claim to fame was his opposition to the civil rights act. And all the RACIST whites in the south—registered Democrats—voted for him. He only won the Deep South States and his home state of Arizona.

The racist scum DIVORCED the Democratic Party in 1964 and had an affair with the GOP until 2008, when the Democratic Party nominated a black man. So then, the GOP and the most disgusting racists had a big public wedding.

The END.

You will confuse kaz and the other of his ilk with the truth.

So you're a Republican because they are a bunch of racists, Jake?

 

[kaz]

Name one black person who has been elected to statewide office in Texas in the last 130 years.
After you find that judge you've never heard of, then go back to pretending white Texans aren't overwhelmingly racist, oppressive morons.

Democrats dominated the State most of the last 130 years, genius, so you admit you're racist?

Sorry, your insane fucked up excuse is so insane that it is worse than Holocaust denial in its profound racism. Your party has taken up the banner of racism, and you know it.

It is self evident.
The Democratic president PUSHED for the civil right act and SIGNED the civil rights act. And then, the Republicans NOMINATED Barry Goldwater a few months after it was signed. Barry Goldwater’s claim to fame was his opposition to the civil rights act. And all the RACIST whites in the south—registered Democrats—voted for him. He only won the Deep South States and his home state of Arizona.

The racist scum DIVORCED the Democratic Party in 1964 and had an affair with the GOP until 2008, when the Democratic Party nominated a black man. So then, the GOP and the most disgusting racists had a big public wedding.

The END.

So what does any of that have to do with libertarians?

 

[Correll]

Tax cuts have historically increased revenue.

The only thing that increases deficits and debt is spending

I see you are committed to proving me 100% correct by displaying that you conservatives are operating on blatant falsehoods.



Tax cuts have not "historically increased revenue". The claim is nothing but a rightwing myth based on piss-poor understanding of revenue drivers (out of which long term economic growth, not minor tax-rate adjustments is a primary factor).

We've had record high revenues in 1990s and record LOW revenues since early 2000. Are you going to tell me that Clinton passed tax cuts and Bush expired them?

I know you won't take MY word for it, but I do urge you to read up on what SANE, NON-IGNORANT conservatives sound like when it comes to tax-cut effects:

Greg Mankiw's Blog: On Charlatans and Cranks

Here is what Bush's former chair of economic advisors, conservative and tax-cut suporter had to say to after Bush made the tax-cuts-increased-revenues claim in his SoTU speech:

You are smart people. You know that the tax cuts have not fueled record revenues. You know what it takes to establish causality. You know that the first order effect of cutting taxes is to lower tax revenues. We all agree that the ultimate reduction in tax revenues can be less than this first order effect, because lower tax rates encourage greater economic activity and thus expand the tax base. No thoughtful person believes that this possible offset more than compensated for the first effect for these tax cuts. Not a single one. - Andrew Samwick

There is only one group of people that believes that tax-cuts at current rates increase revenues - FAR RIGHT POLITICOS. That's what it takes to believe that nonsense. Conservative economists reject it and high profile Republicans no longer try to claim it.

As a percentage of GDP? That is a very odd standard to use. Why not actual revenue, perhaps per capita?

ODD? Because you think it is odd? %GDP is the standard adjustment for economy size and inflation. It is the norm of historic spending and revenues comparison. Per capita revenue (which still doesn't adjust for avg. income growth) trend was also way down by the way, if you look it up, this time yourself perhaps.

Like I said, this is the problem with conservatives, you make up your own facts. Economists? Professional experts? Studies? Fuck that, you know it all in your gut because you heard some rightwing politicos like Rush say it and you really liked the way it sounded.

%GDP makes sense comparing spending in different times or comparing revenues from different times.

But.

If an economic policy leads to tremendous economic growth, and only moderate tax revenue growth, to call the a decline in revenue and a failure is misleading.

It's not perfect, it is simply the best comparison standard we have. Your alternative proposal that we use unadjusted dollar revenues is MUCH worse. If you have another, better standard I would certainly consider it, but you don't.

I will quote you again a CONSERVATIVE, Chair of Economic Advisors to Bush and a tax cut supporter:

You are smart people. You know that the tax cuts have not fueled record revenues. You know what it takes to establish causality. You know that the first order effect of cutting taxes is to lower tax revenues. We all agree that the ultimate reduction in tax revenues can be less than this first order effect, because lower tax rates encourage greater economic activity and thus expand the tax base. No thoughtful person believes that this possible offset more than compensated for the first effect for these tax cuts. Not a single one.


Are you a thoughtful person? Then THINK. Why would anyone object paying less taxes while government collects more revenues? Why would I object to it? Why would conservative economists reject such wonderful free lunch for everyone? THINK

I already suggested what a better standard would be, ie adjusted per capita. AND pointed out why the standard you used was not just imperfect but actively misleading.


Conservatives object to paying more taxes because we believe that no matter how much taxes are paid that politicians can and will spend EVERY single cent given to them and more.

Have you noticed that other first world nations without what the US would call conservatives have similar budget issues? Almost as though that cause is something else.



US Federal spending is just less than FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS. Hardly a cut to the bone miser budget.

 

[Correll]

What if Obama had been white? Then, questioning his birth certificate would STILL be racist?

He is not white. And his birth is the most well attested birth in American presidential election history!

Yet, he is the only American born candidate who has ever been challenged. And given Trump called it into question 3 years after the matter was IMMUTABLY SETTLED by the state of Hawaii, then it is crystal clear it was florid racism.

Question: who was the first president born in a hospital?

Stating that it is crystal clear does not make it so.

Query: What other US president promised radical transformative change for America?

 

[Correll]

I'm pointing out that you are a mindless demagogue who slanders and libels those who are identified as enemies of your shameful party.

And yeah, that does make you a fucking scumbag..

I don't have a party, dumbass.
I am just tired of stupid white people.
It is time to wake the fuck up.

If I said I was tired of "stupid black people" you would say that was racist so how the fuck is your statement any different? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Dumbfuck

The difference is that I am white. Please show me the time when whites have had a serious and no holds barred discussion amongst ourselves about racial oppression.

We have heard what black ought to do to shore up their communities. But we are not black. So it is pretty easy to point to others and say what they ought to do. But it is much harder to do the same in our own houses.

Are you insane?

We whites have been split and fighting over racial oppression since this nation was founded.

You remember the Civil War, where millions of white US citizens fought and killed their fellow white US citizens over the issue?

YOu don't want a discussion.

You want to shout down any opposition with loud lies of racism.

A war isn't a discussion, dumbass.

They discussed the issue until they collectively decided to settle the issue with mass violence and death.

And that only settled that immediate portion of the larger issue and the discussion started up again as soon as the guns fell silent.


Only the willfully blind can look at American history and claim that US whites have not discussed racial oppression.

 

[OKTexas]

You're full of shit, when you can't verify the citizenship.

Sorry, it is insane to think we can't verify the citizenship. Do you think our country has no idea who our citizens are?

There are these things that have been around for thousands of years called “lists.”

Hey dumb ass, the subject is voter registration, federal law prohibits States for verifying citizenship when someone registers, we have to take their word for it.

How about we apply the same standard to buying alcohol, cigarettes, driving, working in porn movies or buying guns, you good with that?

 

[OKTexas]

Non existence, NOT.

Texas had zero examples of in-person voter impersonation fraud when it presented its case in court. That is the only kind of fraud that photo ID might mitigate (if there was actually a problem to mitigate).

It is NOT a hot button issue. What is a hot button isssue is whether states have a right to use a completely bogus reason to inact new voter laws that once again disenfranchise blacks disproportionately.

You're a liar, why didn't you include the link in that quote that showed 51 convictions for fraud, including 2 of impersonation fraud. You're just another lying regressive hack.