Folly In Trumped-Up Defense Already(?)! Cherry-Pick Constitutional Impeachment Language--Conclude It's All Attainder!

Just because no one in the swamp wanted Trump to be president doesn't mean they can steal the election....if this continues we are all screwed on the right and the left....
 
Trump's team to bring evidence of election fraud to court with them...this should be fun....

They have been trying to present acceptable evidence in court for months
But RW...you know that none of the judges would hear or view any evidence...I know you know that so why are you posting what you posted?....

I agree. None of the Judges wanted to see any of the evidence. None of them wanted to be involved in over turning a Presidential election. Plenty of evidence out there and I hope Trump and his people reveal it all.
 
What the Impeachment trial proves is whether or not a President who has lost an election can be held accountable for his actions afterwards.

Hope he reveals all the evidence of the fraudulent election in this fake trial. Wonder what will happen then??
Let the dems and Pelosi have their show trial...this way the people will finally see and hear the evidence of massive criminal election fraud....
 
The trial starts next week to go forward as many days as are deemed(?). "Moot" is a "January Exception," on its face!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
 
“judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.”
not "or"

There must be a removal. It shall not extend beyond removal. If there is removal while in office, it could extend to disqualification.

There was no removal. There was an "election" which did the "job" which has now removal moot.

If this was a legit election, why are the Dems so afraid of Trump in 2024?
The standing of the U.S as the world leader in democracy was never so low as it was between 2016 -2020. Plus thanks to Trump's catering to xenophobes the country has never been this divided since the Civil War. Nobody wants a repeat, so if we can disqualify that narcissistic bag of wind from ever occuping the White House it will be a good thing.
 
What the Impeachment trial proves is whether or not a President who has lost an election can be held accountable for his actions afterwards.


Trump didn't lose the election. The political elite stole the election from WE THE PEOPLE. No matter how many times you repeat your bullshit propaganda no one with a brain will believe you.

Trump was a bad President who botched his leadership during COVID. It cost him a second term. He lost by a wide margin

Rather than accept defeat and admit it was his own fault. Trump made up a lie that he had in fact, won and had been cheated.

Morons such as yourself, believe it.


Trump did more things that benefitted this country in four years than obummer did in 8. You are simply a paid chinese stooge posting bullshit for your masters.

Piss off troll.

Trump did very little except to cut taxes for billionaires.

When his leadership was really tested, he failed miserably in leading through COVID.

It cost him a second term
 
What the Impeachment trial proves is whether or not a President who has lost an election can be held accountable for his actions afterwards.

Hope he reveals all the evidence of the fraudulent election in this fake trial. Wonder what will happen then??
Let the dems and Pelosi have their show trial...this way the people will finally see and hear the evidence of massive criminal election fraud....
Let the evidence against Trump be on the Congressional Record for all history to see
 
Hope he reveals all the evidence of the fraudulent election in this fake trial. Wonder what will happen then??
He won't be present, but his lawyers may certainly reveal all of the evidence. What will happen then is that many people will be rotflmao.
 
Hope he reveals all the evidence of the fraudulent election in this fake trial. Wonder what will happen then??
He won't be present, but his lawyers may certainly reveal all of the evidence. What will happen then is that many people will be rotflmao.
What is funny is pelosi is behaving as if Trump won, which everyone knows he did
 
The trial starts next week to go forward as many days as are deemed(?). "Moot" is a "January Exception," on its face!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
How about, a "January Exception" is really "Moot" on it's face?

It's fucking moot.
 
jc456 poster indirectly exposes how flawed the Trumped-Up defense should be regarded. "Pelosi acting as if Trump had won," is like contending that because an impeachable offense was committed during a term in office: Then for the criminal behavior to remain eligible for Senate Trial, then the perpetrator should be kept in office so that the trial can proceed(?)!

Then the perpetrator could do even more illegal stuff: LIke mutilating baby genitalia out in the Rose Garden(?), or a least the front lawn(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
 
Article II, section 4 provides that officers impeached and convicted “shall be removed from office”...
The notion that Loser would only be impeachable if the insurrection against democracy had succeeded and allowed him to cling to office is an amusing one.

If he persists in his ludicrous, fake claims, he'll just further embarrass the bum kisser Republicans who will kowtow and acquit him: “If they start trying to prove that Georgia and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin were stolen, that’s when you’re going to lose everybody,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said. “That’s when most of us will be ready to move on.”

The argument that the Founding Fathers' intent was to grant blanket immunity to lame duck presidents who might attack the United States is remarkably daft.
 
Bootney Lee Farnsworth poster indirectly exposes how flawed the Trumped-Up defense should be regarded. "Pelosi acting as if Trump had won," is like contending that because an impeachable offense was committed during a term in office: Then for the criminal behavior to remain eligible for Senate Trial, then the perpetrator should be kept in office so that the trial can proceed(?)!

Then the perpetrator could do even more illegal stuff: Like mutilating baby genitalia out in the Rose Garden(?), or a least the front lawn(?)!

One difference from jc456 poster is that Bootney Lee Farnworth poster wants to see the Trumped-Up baby genitalia mutilation proceed with no Senate recourse of Trial with the penalty, "Permanent Disqualification." Said penalty for the baby genital mutilation is Bootney Lee Farnsworth regarded, "Attainder!" (Others, in fact, would likely accrue!)

Effectively: The defense is that the Trumped-Up behavior should be allowed to proceed!


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
 
Last edited:
The drift is similar to the schmidlap post. "The notion that Loser would only be impeachable if the insurrection against democracy had succeeded and allowed him to cling to office is an amusing one."

Then the defense becomes, "The term in office is illegal, therefore the trial of the timely impeachment cannot proceed(?)."


Mostly, more likely, it would be contended in the current Matter: The current occupancy is no longer required. There is no specific request to create an illegal term for a trial(?): Try as the clearly criminal and crooked defense lawyer team wants itself to be regarded!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
 
Last edited:
The trial starts next week to go forward as many days as are deemed(?). "Moot" is a "January Exception," on its face!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-30 pretends Pharaoh's likely alliance arithmetic to be divinely created(?), and so applied. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Often called in English, "Oh Christ!" would explain what that was up with that in Matt 25: 14-30. Lives don't matter, and so get thrown clear out of the program, left to "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth!" The basis is ability or not to keep up with on-going arithmetic--never stopping(?), in the back-drop of Matt 20:1-16--putting on the brakes!)
How about, a "January Exception" is really "Moot" on it's face?

It's fucking moot.
Or, pelosi knows trump won and considers him as the actual president
 

Forum List

Back
Top