Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[bodecea]

From the article: Stutzman is the Washington florist who has been sued for living out her Christian beliefs. In 2013, a long-time friend and customer came to her flower shop and asked her to provide flowers for his gay wedding. Stutzman had known this man and had done business with him for about nine years. Nevertheless, she told him that she could not participate in his wedding "because of my relationship with Jesus."

So what this is about is not that she denied gays accommodation only that her religious beliefs conflict with the beliefs of the gay men. She is refusing to particiapte in what anyone would call their religious ceremony. An now she is being forced to or is out of business. Sad what America is becoming, good job libs.

Change the law. It's been on the books for years and protects Christians from the same rejection....do you think you would complain about it then?

Equating sodomy with religous belief, is that really where we are heading?

Sodomy? You default to sex acts here?

 

[Pop23]

I want to be able to discriminate against whoever I want to. That should be my personal freedom and I don't need to be told by what the government what to do. I don't need or want the government telling me what to do. It is none of their business. The government needs to be concerned with providing for defense, police, courts and a few other community necessities and stay out of the business of telling me how to run my personal life or taking my money and giving it to somebody else.

We have let the government infringe upon our personal liberties and we are all more oppressed because of it. Libtards are simply too stupid understand that concept.

There is a huge difference between not allowing a person to do something (in this case marrying) and refusing to support that action.

There were better, and in my opinion, more productive ways for this florist to handle this, but the same can be said of the couple involved.

Getting the courts, or the government involved was bonehead in my opinion.

Complete waste of resources

 

[bodecea]

From the article: Stutzman is the Washington florist who has been sued for living out her Christian beliefs. In 2013, a long-time friend and customer came to her flower shop and asked her to provide flowers for his gay wedding. Stutzman had known this man and had done business with him for about nine years. Nevertheless, she told him that she could not participate in his wedding "because of my relationship with Jesus."

So what this is about is not that she denied gays accommodation only that her religious beliefs conflict with the beliefs of the gay men. She is refusing to particiapte in what anyone would call their religious ceremony. An now she is being forced to or is out of business. Sad what America is becoming, good job libs.

Change the law. It's been on the books for years and protects Christians from the same rejection....do you think you would complain about it then?

Yeah right this law was all about Christians, wow. The law doesn't need changed, in my opinion she is not in violation of the law.

Have you read the law? Yes or no.

 

[kaz]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them

Oh, well, you haven't seen it, I must be lying then. JoeBigot131 and PaintMyHouse for examlpe have argued that incessently. Given their post count, you are as KosherGirl said obviously not reading

^more lies

Here you go sweetheart. Sucks to be you

Where in the Constitution does it say you have the right to force someone to bake you a cake? I can't find that part.

Where in the constitution does it say they CAN'T require you to bake a cake?


Actually, what requires you to back a cake is when you took out an ad that says, "I bake wedding cakes" In short, your advertisement was half of a written contract.

That doesn't even remotely say that gays shouldn't have to deal with Christians.

You're right on the quote. I confused it with the other discussion, but you're still wrong, sorry. Liberals tried that and got fine to the point what if gays don't want to deal with them.

I'm not finding those quotes for you, you made the claim, I don't have to prove you wrong

No, you made the claim. I reread the thread and no one said that gay people should be able to refuse serving Christians.

When you said that Christians would object if the law was reversed and I said no, they wouldn't, that was me making the claim. Gotcha. Prove me wrong!!!

This discussion has spanned multiple threads actually and several liberals have made the accusation you did and each one whiffed like you did. If you want to know, why don't you start a thread with a poll? Just don't make it a stupid poll like liberals always do. What about these as the choices?

Would Christians be OK with laws allowing gay businesses to not do business with them if Christian businesses are allowed to not do business with gays?

I am not a Christian, I think Christians would object to that
I am not a Christian, I think Christians would not object to that
I am a Christian, I should be able to discriminate against gays but not the reverse
I am a Christian, I'm good both ways

If you want to know the truth, be sure to set it to display the voters so liberals don't stack the vote

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

 

[Redfish]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

 

[bodecea]

You'll see more states passing these laws.

Senate approves controversial religious freedom bill Fox 59

The state Senate passed a controversial religious freedom bill Tuesday that could potentially allow Indiana businesses to refuse service to newly married same-sex couples. This bill passed on with Republican support, 40-10, and now heads to the House of Representatives.

“If you were to ask the question, what is the single most important pillar of our democracy, chances are the answer to that question is going to be freedom of religion,” said State Senator Scott Schneider (R – Indianapolis) during Tuesday’s debate.

And in my view, that makes it even worse. This isn't a religious freedom issue. It's a freedom issue. We should reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

You have to start somewhere and it's obvious current law isn't working

How are you working to get the law changed?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

From the article: Stutzman is the Washington florist who has been sued for living out her Christian beliefs. In 2013, a long-time friend and customer came to her flower shop and asked her to provide flowers for his gay wedding. Stutzman had known this man and had done business with him for about nine years. Nevertheless, she told him that she could not participate in his wedding "because of my relationship with Jesus."

So what this is about is not that she denied gays accommodation only that her religious beliefs conflict with the beliefs of the gay men. She is refusing to particiapte in what anyone would call their religious ceremony. An now she is being forced to or is out of business. Sad what America is becoming, good job libs.

Change the law. It's been on the books for years and protects Christians from the same rejection....do you think you would complain about it then?

Equating sodomy with religous belief, is that really where we are heading?

You want to put a camera in their bedroom so you know what you're discriminating against?

You didn't answer the question:

Change the law. It's been on the books for years and protects Christians from the same rejection....do you think you would complain about it then?

Which religions should be discriminated against?

Which lifestyles, races, sexes, ages should it be legal to discriminated against?

 

[PratchettFan]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

You understand that these suits are not filed by the president but by attorneys representing the fired workers, don't you?

I do believe he is still POTUS and thus in charge.

No. He is not in charge. Really, this is high school civics stuff. The president can't stop you from filing a lawsuit. No matter how much people tell you it is and how much you want to believe it, this county is not a dictatorship.

 

[bodecea]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

You DO know that couple did business with that florist just fine for 9 years and were shocked when she stated that suddenly Jesus didn't want her to provide them with flowers for their wedding. Right? You knew that, right?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

That's no more my business than their sexuality is but why would a business purposely discourage paying customers? That's also not my business.

What is the business of all of us is that our country supposedly stands for equality. More to the point, its the law.

Loony homophobes are welcome to their ignorant bigotry but they don't get to usurp that law.

You conveniently ignored my comment but here it is again:

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

 

[PratchettFan]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

They had not been refused before that. They probably don't care if someone does not approve, they only cared when they were being discriminated against. Of course, that's just a guess on my part - not knowing them.

 

[Redfish]

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

You DO know that couple did business with that florist just fine for 9 years and were shocked when she stated that suddenly Jesus didn't want her to provide them with flowers for their wedding. Right? You knew that, right?

No, I did not know that. but what difference does it make? Once she stated her views why didn't they find another florist?

We all know the answer don't we? To stir up shit for the gay agenda. If you are honest you will agree, but I don't think you can allow yourself to be honest about this.

 

[Redfish]

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

That's no more my business than their sexuality is but why would a business purposely discourage paying customers? That's also not my business.

What is the business of all of us is that our country supposedly stands for equality. More to the point, its the law.

Loony homophobes are welcome to their ignorant bigotry but they don't get to usurp that law.

You conveniently ignored my comment but here it is again:

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

so a business owner has no freedom, only minorities have freedom? think about it, thats what you are saying.

 

[PratchettFan]

From the article: Stutzman is the Washington florist who has been sued for living out her Christian beliefs. In 2013, a long-time friend and customer came to her flower shop and asked her to provide flowers for his gay wedding. Stutzman had known this man and had done business with him for about nine years. Nevertheless, she told him that she could not participate in his wedding "because of my relationship with Jesus."

So what this is about is not that she denied gays accommodation only that her religious beliefs conflict with the beliefs of the gay men. She is refusing to particiapte in what anyone would call their religious ceremony. An now she is being forced to or is out of business. Sad what America is becoming, good job libs.

Change the law. It's been on the books for years and protects Christians from the same rejection....do you think you would complain about it then?

Yeah right this law was all about Christians, wow. The law doesn't need changed, in my opinion she is not in violation of the law.

It would appear the state courts disagree with you.

It does appear that way that ONE court disagrees.

And that decision has not been overturned, so one is all it takes.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ignorance is bliss, with the liberal media we have no wonder you don't hear of these things. Doing nothing IS allowing.

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol, and Dogs

Muslim Cab Drivers Refuse to Transport Alcohol and Dogs - ABC News

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

Redfish

Which people or groups do you think it should be legal to discriminate against? How do you suggest we change the Constitution to allow that discrimination?

Try to answer honestly.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

That's no more my business than their sexuality is but why would a business purposely discourage paying customers? That's also not my business.

What is the business of all of us is that our country supposedly stands for equality. More to the point, its the law.

Loony homophobes are welcome to their ignorant bigotry but they don't get to usurp that law.

You conveniently ignored my comment but here it is again:

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

so a business owner has no freedom, only minorities have freedom? think about it, thats what you are saying.

You think a business owner should be able to pick and choose which laws he/she will obey? And if he decides not to obey a law, he should get a pass?

 

[PratchettFan]

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

That's no more my business than their sexuality is but why would a business purposely discourage paying customers? That's also not my business.

What is the business of all of us is that our country supposedly stands for equality. More to the point, its the law.

Loony homophobes are welcome to their ignorant bigotry but they don't get to usurp that law.

You conveniently ignored my comment but here it is again:

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

so a business owner has no freedom, only minorities have freedom? think about it, thats what you are saying.

I don't think that is what he is saying at all. If you open your business to the public, then you have to let the public in.

 

[Redfish]

Yeah, I had forgotten about that story.

Trying to think back about the outrage from the PC Police here.

Gosh, can't come up with any examples.

.

So from the story you guys quoted-

But, under the new proposal, drivers who decline to provide service would face a 30-day suspension of their license. Second offenders would have their licenses revoked.

so they've told these Muslims, despite your religion, you have to take the drunk with his "Service Dog" which is just his regular dog with a sweater that says "Service dog".

Which is reasonably fair.

Just like it's reasonably fair to require florist and bakers to service gay weddings.

Obama Inc. Sues Trucking Company for Firing Muslim Drivers Who Refused to Deliver Alcohol

Be sure to read the comments on this loony blog.

The stupidity of RWs never ceases to amaze me. Or how many believe 'equality for all, except those you arbitrarily decide to hate'.

Just one question: why would a gay couple want to do business with a florist who does not approve of gay marriage? Why would they want to contribute to the profit of a business that does not approve of their lifestyle?

Try to answer honestly.

They had not been refused before that. They probably don't care if someone does not approve, they only cared when they were being discriminated against. Of course, that's just a guess on my part - not knowing them.

Ok, dude. I am a white cajun male. If I go up to Harlem and a black owned barbeque place refuses to sell me a rack or ribs because they don't like cajuns, I will just flip them off and go to another place to eat.

Why would I want to give my business to someone who does not like me?

you libs have this gay rights thing stuck up your ass. (bad analogy)

 

[Ravi]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them

^more lies

Here you go sweetheart. Sucks to be you

Where in the constitution does it say they CAN'T require you to bake a cake?


Actually, what requires you to back a cake is when you took out an ad that says, "I bake wedding cakes" In short, your advertisement was half of a written contract.

That doesn't even remotely say that gays shouldn't have to deal with Christians.

You're right on the quote. I confused it with the other discussion, but you're still wrong, sorry. Liberals tried that and got fine to the point what if gays don't want to deal with them.

I'm not finding those quotes for you, you made the claim, I don't have to prove you wrong

No, you made the claim. I reread the thread and no one said that gay people should be able to refuse serving Christians.

When you said that Christians would object if the law was reversed and I said no, they wouldn't, that was me making the claim. Gotcha. Prove me wrong!!!

This discussion has spanned multiple threads actually and several liberals have made the accusation you did and each one whiffed like you did. If you want to know, why don't you start a thread with a poll? Just don't make it a stupid poll like liberals always do. What about these as the choices?

Would Christians be OK with laws allowing gay businesses to not do business with them if Christian businesses are allowed to not do business with gays?

I am not a Christian, I think Christians would object to that
I am not a Christian, I think Christians would not object to that
I am a Christian, I should be able to discriminate against gays but not the reverse
I am a Christian, I'm good both ways

If you want to know the truth, be sure to set it to display the voters so liberals don't stack the vote

Dude. Your stupid strawman is dismissed.

Gays cannot discriminate against Christians. And no one has said they should be able to do so.