- Thread starter
- #121
I already told you, I’m not posting the link because it’s more fun watching you shit over your made up conspiracy. Which is why I just bumped this thread.Wow, you’re completely brain-dead. This IS Google’s explanation... it’s either the publisher themselves labeling the date incorrectly or it’s a timezone issue.Now you’re flat out lying. Typical of conservatives.Actually, you haven't posted the Google's explanation.
Unless the explanation is about the bug that happened two years ago.
Here I am, posting Google’s explanation, which you just falsely claimed I didn’t post...
It’s been explained to you. Why you can’t grasp it is anyone’s guess? Meanwhile, Google’s explanation is it’s either the publisher themselves labeling the date incorrectly or it’s a timezone issue.
Comprehension problem?
Nope, that's your explanation. You still haven't posted Google's explanation.
Do I need to draw to you that you need to post the link where Google address this issue and that is not older than two weeks?
Link to Google's explanation?
But I’ve told you repeatedly what their explanations are. The article is out there if you’re smart enough to find it.
It's not that I don't trust you, but I don't trust you. What you're saying is your interpretation of their explanation, not their explanation. So if you're referring to something that they officially said, you better provide the link to the article. Assuming it's out there, since you saw it, that wont be a problem, right?