Ame®icano
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #121
I already told you, Iām not posting the link because itās more fun watching you shit over your made up conspiracy. Which is why I just bumped this thread.Wow, youāre completely brain-dead. This IS Googleās explanation... itās either the publisher themselves labeling the date incorrectly or itās a timezone issue.Now youāre flat out lying. Typical of conservatives.Actually, you haven't posted the Google's explanation.
Unless the explanation is about the bug that happened two years ago.
Here I am, posting Googleās explanation, which you just falsely claimed I didnāt post...
Itās been explained to you. Why you canāt grasp it is anyoneās guess?Meanwhile, Googleās explanation is itās either the publisher themselves labeling the date incorrectly or itās a timezone issue.
Comprehension problem?
Nope, that's your explanation. You still haven't posted Google's explanation.
Do I need to draw to you that you need to post the link where Google address this issue and that is not older than two weeks?
Link to Google's explanation?
But Iāve told you repeatedly what their explanations are. The article is out there if youāre smart enough to find it.
It's not that I don't trust you, but I don't trust you. What you're saying is your interpretation of their explanation, not their explanation. So if you're referring to something that they officially said, you better provide the link to the article. Assuming it's out there, since you saw it, that wont be a problem, right?