- Mar 22, 2021
- 10,296
- 17,195
- 2,288
Watch how hysterical they become next year.For a party so confident Trump isn't popular enough to win y'all sure do seem intent on not giving him the chance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Watch how hysterical they become next year.For a party so confident Trump isn't popular enough to win y'all sure do seem intent on not giving him the chance.
Yes , because Biden and Heels up Harris are doing such a stand up job. Just one question remains , are you a Democrat or are you American?Unfortunately..and it pains me to say this, but despite the fact that he's an in the pocket shill, Professor Doucheowitz is correct.
Nothing, not even a conviction for any of the 91 indictments against him will prevent him from running for President.
And if people would just think for a moment with a clear head, having Trump run is a good thing. It ensures the destruction of the Republican party and the fact that none of his primary competitors will make it past Super Tuesday next year.
It will also make his defeat in the general election that much sweeter.
I'm an American first. That's why I want to see Trump go the way of the dinosaur.Yes , because Biden and Heels up Harris are doing such a stand up job. Just one question remains , are you a Democrat or are you American?
They went through the legal procedures and when there were no more after the Supreme Court decision they condeded.I remember in 2000 Democrat election deniers tried to overturn the election results in Florida in order to make Al Gore president. They claimed everything from confusing ballots to hanging chads. And yet not one Democrat election denier was ever charged or had their mug shot taken.
if joe biden is the best your party has your party aint far behind....Unfortunately..and it pains me to say this, but despite the fact that he's an in the pocket shill, Professor Doucheowitz is correct.
Nothing, not even a conviction for any of the 91 indictments against him will prevent him from running for President.
And if people would just think for a moment with a clear head, having Trump run is a good thing. It ensures the destruction of the Republican party and the fact that none of his primary competitors will make it past Super Tuesday next year.
It will also make his defeat in the general election that much sweeter.
That pesky Constitution, always getting in the way of the Left, innit?That’s it’s unfortunate Congress never passed legislation codifying a mechanism by which a treasonous insurrectionist like Trump would be rendered disqualified from running in every state.
Trump gets brutal news as a Florida lawyer files a federal lawsuit to disqualify Trump from the 2024 presidential race due to the “disqualification clause” in the Constitution's 14th Amendment than bans “insurrectionists” from office.
But it gets WORSE for Trump…
The lawyer declared in his lawsuit that it is “crystal clear” that Trump’s actions leading up to, on, and after January 6 show that he “both engaged in an insurrection and also gave aid and comfort to other individuals who were engaging in such actions, within the clear meaning of those terms as defined in Section Three of the 14th Amendment.”
The lawyer also argues that “the 800-plus page report issued last year by the congressional committee that investigated Trump's role in alleged efforts to thwart the electoral process, as well as accusations he incited the violence on Capitol Hill that day, are grounds for disqualification.”
The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union.
Applying the 14th Amendment's disqualification rule to Trump has been a rising talking point this month.
The lawyer and a growing chorus of legal scholars, even prominent conservative ones, say that the amendment does not even require a conviction in the courts — but simply a finding that he violated the clause.
Palm Beach County lawyer files legal challenge to disqualify Trump from 2024 presidential race
The challenge was filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the 14th Amendment's "disqualification clause."www.palmbeachpost.com
Florida lawyer files challenge to disqualify Trump from 2024 race, citing 14th Amendment
A Florida lawyer is challenging former President Trump’s ability to run for president in 2024 under the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, citing the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. Lawr…thehill.com
I also believe that Trump should be disqualified from the 2024 presidential race due to the “disqualification clause” in the Constitution's 14th Amendment than bans “insurrectionists” from office. What do you think?
But it gets WORSE for Trump…
The insurrection clause never required a trial. Or a conviction. It was to be determined by the person responsible for determining a persons qualifications for a position. Example, union soldiers who joined the confederacy, could not rejoin the union army, or hold any federal or state office. But the disqualification had to be made before they could rejoin the army, or hold a federal office. To require a trial, or a conviction would delay their disqualification for months to years.Since Trump has never been found guilty of insurrection, this is a stretch.
As are all civil and military officers of the government.Utter rubbish. Article 3 of the 14th does not apply, for various reasons. Among these reasons, no mention is made of 'President', while Senator and Representative are specifically mentioned.
As are all civil and military officers of the government.
Remember, the president is commander-in-chief of the military.
Of course, such disability can be overridden by congress
. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So all enemy democrats have to do is find a communist judge. That should be easy enough.The insurrection clause never required a trial. Or a conviction. It was to be determined by the person responsible for determining a persons qualifications for a position. Example, union soldiers who joined the confederacy, could not rejoin the union army, or hold any federal or state office. But the disqualification had to be made before they could rejoin the army, or hold a federal office. To require a trial, or a conviction would delay their disqualification for months to years.
And such delays could not have been the intention when they passed the 14th amendment.
They didn't attempt a coup.I remember in 2000 Democrat election deniers tried to overturn the election results in Florida in order to make Al Gore president. They claimed everything from confusing ballots to hanging chads. And yet not one Democrat election denier was ever charged or had their mug shot taken.
“Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” is the definition of Hate Speech In the 1,000 year democrat ReichThat’s it’s unfortunate Congress never passed legislation codifying a mechanism by which a treasonous insurrectionist like Trump would be rendered disqualified from running in every state.
Can you point out in his 1 hour and 10 minute incinerating ellipse speech, where he said that....?“Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” is the definition of Hate Speech In the 1,000 year democrat Reich
https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-jan-6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trialCan you point out in his 1 hour and 10 minute incinerating ellipse speech, where he said that....?
They didn't attempt a coup.
LOL. Like that is going to happen in Florida. However, if blue states want to take Trump off the ballot then red states should be allowed to remove Biden from the ballot.Trump gets brutal news as a Florida lawyer files a federal lawsuit to disqualify Trump from the 2024 presidential race due to the “disqualification clause” in the Constitution's 14th Amendment than bans “insurrectionists” from office.
But it gets WORSE for Trump…
The lawyer declared in his lawsuit that it is “crystal clear” that Trump’s actions leading up to, on, and after January 6 show that he “both engaged in an insurrection and also gave aid and comfort to other individuals who were engaging in such actions, within the clear meaning of those terms as defined in Section Three of the 14th Amendment.”
The lawyer also argues that “the 800-plus page report issued last year by the congressional committee that investigated Trump's role in alleged efforts to thwart the electoral process, as well as accusations he incited the violence on Capitol Hill that day, are grounds for disqualification.”
The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union.
Applying the 14th Amendment's disqualification rule to Trump has been a rising talking point this month.
The lawyer and a growing chorus of legal scholars, even prominent conservative ones, say that the amendment does not even require a conviction in the courts — but simply a finding that he violated the clause.
Palm Beach County lawyer files legal challenge to disqualify Trump from 2024 presidential race
The challenge was filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the 14th Amendment's "disqualification clause."www.palmbeachpost.com
Florida lawyer files challenge to disqualify Trump from 2024 race, citing 14th Amendment
A Florida lawyer is challenging former President Trump’s ability to run for president in 2024 under the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, citing the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. Lawr…thehill.com
I also believe that Trump should be disqualified from the 2024 presidential race due to the “disqualification clause” in the Constitution's 14th Amendment than bans “insurrectionists” from office. What do you think?