Florida Judge Whacks Trump Lawyers With $1 Million In Sanctions For Misuse Of The Courts

[skews13]

Federal District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks on Thursday dropped the hammer on former President Donald Trump's attorneys by hitting them with sanctions totaling nearly $1 million for what he described as "misuse of the courts

In a court order flagged by Politico's Kyle Cheney, Middlebrooks raked Trump's lawyers over the coals for their failed lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for purportedly defaming him by accusing him of being Russian President Vladimir Putin's puppet during the 2016 campaign.

"This case should never have been brought," Middlebrooks began his order. "Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start. No reasonable lawyer would have filed it. Intended for a political purpose, none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim."

Florida judge whacks Trump lawyers with nearly $1 million in sanctions for 'misuse of the courts'

Federal District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks on Thursday dropped the hammer on former President Donald Trump's attorneys by hitting them with sanctions totaling nearly $1 million for what he described as "misuse of the courts."In a court order flagged by Politico's Kyle Cheney, Middlebrooks...

www.rawstory.com

You’ve now had your way to many days in court loser. From now on it’s going to be costly for you to be anywhere near a courthouse.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Will the RNC be paying that fine too?
The fine won't stop Trump, he wasn't fined.
Trump has a 40 year old addiction to frivolous lawsuits.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.




Look skewed one, you gotta get more believable schtick.

RawSewage lies continually.



.

 

[pknopp]

.




Look skewed one, you gotta get more believable schtick.

RawSewage lies continually.



.

Judge sanctions Trump and his lawyer nearly $1 million for 'frivolous' lawsuit targeting Hillary Clinton

Trump, lawyers sanctioned nearly $1 million for 'political' lawsuit vs Clinton

A federal judge on Thursday ordered former U.S. President Donald Trump and his attorneys to pay more than $937,000 in sanctions for suing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over claims the 2016 presidential election was rigged.

www.reuters.com

Federal judge sanctions Trump, attorneys over $900,000 for ‘a continuing pattern of misuse of the courts’

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

And what about Porklosi and all the rest of her little demonic wanna-be clones????

They've wasted BILLIONS of dollars of taxpayers money of LIES, DECIET, and SLANDER through the courts!!!

 

[toobfreak]

UNSKEWED TRANSLATION:

Middlebrooks raked Trump's lawyers over the coals for their failed lawsuit against Hillary Clinton

It failed only because he killed it.

for purportedly defaming him by accusing him of being Russian President Vladimir Putin's puppet during the 2016 campaign.

How could you not be defamed as a highly public figure by an enemy using the FISA Court and the whole of the DNC to spend two years and 30 million of the public's dollars on TV everyday calling you a corrupt, for hire Russian puppet? What the court was really protecting here was the alphabet agencies who were behind it all facilitating it. Had Trump won a conviction against Hillary, that would have legitimized a lawsuit against half the federal government as well!

"This case should never have been brought"

This court never wanted to see it and be faced with having to deal with the weight of it.

Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start.

The chances of the judge allowing such a case to be presented, and on the actual merits of the evidence-- risking the legal indemnity of the entire federal government in trying to effect real repair to our highly corrupted faux federal election system and thus, the entire reputation and career and retirement plan of the judge always was exactly ZERO.

No reasonable lawyer would have filed it.

A reasonable lawyer acts as a friend of the court, not an ally for political revolution even for the good of the nation.

Intended for a political purpose

THERE IT IS: By calling it a "political purpose," the court immediately renders the entire election process and the filling of elected offices in Washington as something entirely ABOVE legal consideration (THE LAW) instead of actually being held to a HIGHER standard! That is the foot in the door for making federal political corruption of the government as infinitely unaccountable to self-correction and thus the very SOURCE of where governmental corruption begins, and so, the sedition and subversion of the nation itself for corrupt ends possible.

Since everything involving election fraud and cheating EFFECTS a political end (an elected office determining representation by the people), the judge just admitted that the court will not even consider it.

none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim.

Lawyers such as the judge, all with an interest in preserving and protecting the justice system as effected for their own benefit, have carefully crafted the law not to include any punishable standard for malfeasance within the government itself, but they have 500,000 laws on you, so they call all challenges against election malfeasance by the government itself "legally uncognizable" (fancy way of saying "legally undefined," and the court cannot consider nor act upon an undefined legal challenge as the law gives no compass on how to treat it).

Middlebrooks went on to detail the damage caused by the Trump legal team.

Now he wants to bitch-slap them hoping it'll scare them into falling into line. If Trump and they have any brains, they will appeal the judgement.

 

[presonorek]

Frivolous lawsuits are ok. Courts are there to broaden the legal industry. Stopping frivolous lawsuits will never be a thing.

 

[pknopp]

UNSKEWED TRANSLATION:


It failed only because he killed it.


How could you not be defamed as a highly public figure by an enemy using the FISA Court and the whole of the DNC to spend two years and 30 million of the public's dollars on TV everyday calling you a corrupt, for hire Russian puppet? What the court was really protecting here was the alphabet agencies who were behind it all facilitating it. Had Trump won a conviction against Hillary, that would have legitimized a lawsuit against half the federal government as well!


This court never wanted to see it and be faced with having to deal with the weight of it.


The chances of the judge allowing such a case to be presented, and on the actual merits of the evidence-- risking the legal indemnity of the entire federal government in trying to effect real repair to our highly corrupted faux federal election system and thus, the entire reputation and career and retirement plan of the judge always was exactly ZERO.


A reasonable lawyer acts as a friend of the court, not an ally for political revolution even for the good of the nation.


THERE IT IS: By calling it a "political purpose," the court immediately renders the entire election process and the filling of elected offices in Washington as something entirely ABOVE legal consideration (THE LAW) instead of actually being held to a HIGHER standard! That is the foot in the door for making federal political corruption of the government as infinitely unaccountable to self-correction and thus the very SOURCE of where governmental corruption begins, and so, the sedition and subversion of the nation itself for corrupt ends possible.

Since everything involving election fraud and cheating EFFECTS a political end (an elected office determining representation by the people), the judge just admitted that the court will not even consider it.


Lawyers such as the judge, all with an interest in preserving and protecting the justice system as effected for their own benefit, have carefully crafted the law not to include any punishable standard for malfeasance within the government itself, but they have 500,000 laws on you, so they call all challenges against election malfeasance by the government itself "legally uncognizable" (fancy way of saying "legally undefined," and the court cannot consider nor act upon an undefined legal challenge as the law gives no compass on how to treat it).


Now he wants to bitch-slap them hoping it'll scare them into falling into line. If Trump and they have any brains, they will appeal the judgement.

Trump did what he has done for years. Files a lawsuit with no actual intent to follow it to conclusion because he realized most people would cave rather than spend the money to fight it.

It just doesn't work outside of his old business dealings.

Earlier a judge had to practically beg him to provide his evidence and rather than do that, he dropped the case.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/politics/trump-campaign-voter-fraud-lawsuit-pennsylvania/index.html

I believe he very well may have had a case here but Trump is stuck with ambulance chasers because of how many times he has stiffed lawyers in the past. He also doesn't have the ability to stick something out.

 

[Moonglow]

enjoy paying yer fines boys.

 

[presonorek]

enjoy paying yer fines boys.

Winning a lawsuit means you get a judgement not money.

 

[Moonglow]

Winning a lawsuit means you get a judgement not money.

Oh, there is always money involved in lawsuits, even when it's not about money.

 

[presonorek]

Oh, there is always money involved in lawsuits, even when it's not about money.

For the lawyers not the winners.

 

[Moonglow]

For the lawyers not the winners.

not in every case.

 

[presonorek]

not in every case.

Winners don't get money.

Here is an example:

George sues Bob for one million dollars. George pays his lawyer $20,000. Bob pays his lawyer $20,000. George wins the lawsuit. Bob never pays George.

George wins negative $20,000. Bob wins negative $20,000. Both lawyers gain $20,000. Bob wouldn't pay if is life or his freedom depended on it. Bob would rather sit in jail than to pay George. The legal profession is stupid. If you ever have legal issues it is a guaranteed loss. There is no reason to pay a lawyer. The lawyer will make you lose bigger. The aggressors always win in court. That's why the legal profession is so lucrative. It works every time for the bad guy. There is no justice. Just lawyers.

 

[pknopp]

Winners don't get money.

Here is an example:

George sues Bob for one million dollars. George pays his lawyer $20,000. Bob pays his lawyer $20,000. George wins the lawsuit. Bob never pays George.

George wins negative $20,000. Bob wins negative $20,000. Both lawyers gain $20,000. Bob wouldn't pay if is life or his freedom depended on it. Bob would rather sit in jail than to pay George. The legal profession is stupid. If you ever have legal issues it is a guaranteed loss. There is no reason to pay a lawyer. The lawyer will make you lose bigger. The aggressors always win in court. That's why the legal profession is so lucrative. It works every time for the bad guy. There is no justice. Just lawyers.

Because obviously that is the norm.

 

[presonorek]

Because obviously that is the norm.

If you were sued for $350,000 and you lost, would you pay?

 

[pknopp]

If you were sued for $350,000 and you lost, would you pay?

If I didn't my house would have a lien against it and my wages would get attached. I suppose I could decide to be an outside person the rest of my life.

 

[Moonglow]

If you were sued for $350,000 and you lost, would you pay?

When the sheriff comes to collect.

 

[Moonglow]

If I didn't my house would have a lien against it and my wages would get attached. I suppose I could decide to be an outside person the rest of my life.

But he said no one wins any money so you don't have to pay.

 

[presonorek]

If I didn't my house would have a lien against it and my wages would get attached. I suppose I could decide to be an outside person the rest of my life.

So you wouldn't pay?