Judge Cannon pushes back Trump deadline for filing

[Dante]

I thought senate was responsible for appointments to DOJ.

You're totally confused again.

Special Counsel Jack Smith

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site.

www.justice.gov

Office of the Attorney General
Washington, D.C. 20530
ORDER NO. 5559-2022
Appointment OF JOHN L. SMITH AS SPECIAL COUNSEL

By virtue of the authority vested in the Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509,
510 , 515, and 533, in order to discharge my responsibility to provide supervision and
management of the Department of Justice, and to ensure a full and thorough investigation of
certain matters, I hereby order as follows:

(a) John L. Smith is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States
Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/d9/press-releases/attachments/2022/11/18/2022.11.18_order_5559-2022.pdf

 

[Dante]

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

###

FBI agents PLANTED evidence at Trump Mar-a-Lago raid; judge postpones trial indefinitely​

BLAZETV STAFF
MAY 09, 2024

FBI agents PLANTED evidence at Trump Mar-a-Lago raid; judge postpones trial indefinitely | Blaze Media

It doesn’t matter whether you hate or love Donald Trump. What’s being done to the former president by our government should disturb every single American. Reports have revealed that FBI agents placed “cover sheets” onto allegedly classified documents found during its raid of Mar-a-Lago in...

www.theblaze.com

This issue was previously raised by Attorney Paul Kamenar in his representation of Andrew Miller, who was held in contempt for failing to comply with a grand jury subpoena served on him by Robert Mueller, who was also a private citizen when he was appointed as a special counsel to investigate the Russia/Trump collusion hoax. Kamenar made the same arguments, but a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled against Miller. However, that decision was never appealed and the Supreme Court has never addressed the issue.

Was It Legal To Appoint Jack Smith in the First Place?

Was Special Counsel Jack Smith illegally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland and is his prosecution of former Pres. Donald Trump unlawful?

www.heritage.org

 

[Blisterfinger]

I'm talking to you, not your orange god.

How would your civil war look? A bunch of fat rednecks tailgating on the FBI office lawn?

Stop playing with yourself and answer.

You would be found cowering in a puddle of piss

 

[Delldude]

How would your civil war look?

Never advocated for civil war, crybaby.

 

[Delldude]

You're totally confused again.

Special Counsel Jack Smith

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site.

www.justice.gov

Office of the Attorney General
Washington, D.C. 20530
ORDER NO. 5559-2022
Appointment OF JOHN L. SMITH AS SPECIAL COUNSEL

By virtue of the authority vested in the Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509,
510 , 515, and 533, in order to discharge my responsibility to provide supervision and
management of the Department of Justice, and to ensure a full and thorough investigation of
certain matters, I hereby order as follows:

(a) John L. Smith is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States
Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/d9/press-releases/attachments/2022/11/18/2022.11.18_order_5559-2022.pdf

Amicus brief before SCOTUS challenging that.

 

[Dante]

Amicus brief before SCOTUS challenging that.

An Amicus brief. Wow!

Better Call Durham!

Post #282

This issue was previously raised by Attorney Paul Kamenar in his representation of Andrew Miller, who was held in contempt for failing to comply with a grand jury subpoena served on him by Robert Mueller, who was also a private citizen when he was appointed as a special counsel to investigate the Russia/Trump collusion hoax. Kamenar made the same arguments, but a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled against Miller.

 

[Delldude]

Wow!

Court to hear arguments...................

 

[Dante]

Court to hear arguments...................

Maybe.

This issue was previously raised by Attorney Paul Kamenar in his representation of Andrew Miller, who was held in contempt for failing to comply with a grand jury subpoena served on him by Robert Mueller, who was also a private citizen when he was appointed as a special counsel to investigate the Russia/Trump collusion hoax. Kamenar made the same arguments, but a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled against Miller. However, that decision was never appealed and the Supreme Court has never addressed the issue.

Was It Legal To Appoint Jack Smith in the First Place?

Was Special Counsel Jack Smith illegally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland and is his prosecution of former Pres. Donald Trump unlawful?

www.heritage.org

 

[Delldude]

Maybe.

Already in process.

 

[Dante]

Already in process.

That part of Trump's appeal will go nowhere.

keeper posts

 

[hadit]

Nope. this shit shoulda happened back in 2020 or 21. Utterly ridiculous that this traitor has been waking around loose for 4 fucking years.

It should have, sure, but then it wouldn't have had the desired impact on the election. That is the goal here, after all.

 

[Delldude]

That part of Trump's appeal will go nowhere.

keeper posts

Hard to say...............and it isn't Trump's appeal.

 

[Dante]

Hard to say...............and it isn't Trump's appeal.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[Delldude]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf

Oh wow, man...

 

[Dante]

Oh wow, man...

Wow! Wow! Wow!

Will go nowhere,

 

[Crepitus]

So I know that you are well aware that all of the cases against President Trump are (pun intended) TRUMPED UP and have no basis in reality.

Fake news.

tRump broke the law.

Many many times.

He's going down.

 

[Crepitus]

It should have, sure, but then it wouldn't have had the desired impact on the election. That is the goal here, after all.

Nope. Merrick garland is a coward and was hoping it would just go away.

The 1/6 committee shamed him into it.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Fake news.

tRump broke the law.

Many many times.

He's going down.

You are a loser, Bow Down. I'm on Trump's side because I like to win.

 

[Crepitus]

You are a loser, Bow Down. I'm on Trump's side because I like to win.

LOL!!!